Particle Orbits at the Magnetopause: Kelvin‐Helmholtz Induced Trapping

The Kelvin‐Helmholtz instability is a known mechanism for penetration of solar wind matter into the magnetosphere. Using three‐dimensional, resistive magnetohydrodynamic simulations, the double midlatitude reconnection (DMLR) process was shown to efficiently exchange solar wind matter into the magnetosphere, through mixing and reconnection. Here we compute test particle orbits through DMLR configurations. In the instantaneous electromagnetic fields, charged particle trajectories are integrated using the guiding center approximation. The mechanisms involved in the electron particle orbits and their kinetic energy evolutions are studied in detail, to identify specific signatures of the DMLR through particle characteristics. The charged particle orbits are influenced mainly by magnetic curvature drifts. We identify complex, temporarily trapped trajectories where the combined electric field and (reconnected) magnetic field variations realize local cavities where particles gain energy before escaping. By comparing the orbits in strongly deformed fields due to the Kelvin‐Helmholtz instability development, with the textbook mirror‐drift orbits resulting from our initial configuration, we identify effects due to current sheets formed in the DMLR process. We do this in various representative stages during the DMLR development.

[1]  Yun Li,et al.  Evolution of Kelvin–Helmholtz Instability on the Venusian Ionopause with the Influence of Hall Effect , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[2]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  Prolonged Kelvin–Helmholtz Waves at Dawn and Dusk Flank Magnetopause: Simultaneous Observations by MMS and THEMIS , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[3]  Rony Keppens,et al.  Magnetohydrodynamics of Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas , 2019 .

[4]  J. P. Goedbloed The Spectral Web of stationary plasma equilibria. I. General theory , 2018 .

[5]  Peter A. Delamere,et al.  Asymmetric Kelvin‐Helmholtz Instability at Jupiter's Magnetopause Boundary: Implications for Corotation‐Dominated Systems , 2018 .

[6]  F. Califano,et al.  Magnetized Kelvin–Helmholtz instability: theory and simulations in the Earth’s magnetosphere context , 2017, Journal of Plasma Physics.

[7]  Rony Keppens,et al.  A Comprehensive Comparison of Relativistic Particle Integrators , 2017, 1710.09164.

[8]  I. E. Mellah,et al.  MPI-AMRVAC 2.0 for Solar and Astrophysical Applications , 2017, 1710.06140.

[9]  P. Delamere,et al.  Plasma Transport Driven by the Three‐Dimensional Kelvin‐Helmholtz Instability , 2017 .

[10]  B. Ripperda,et al.  Reconnection and particle acceleration in interacting flux ropes - II. 3D effects on test particles in magnetically dominated plasmas , 2017, 1707.08920.

[11]  Rony Keppens,et al.  On the influence of environmental parameters on mixing and reconnection caused by the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the magnetopause , 2017 .

[12]  Rony Keppens,et al.  Reconnection and particle acceleration in interacting flux ropes - I. Magnetohydrodynamics and test particles in 2.5D , 2016, 1611.09966.

[13]  M. Bárta,et al.  ELECTRON ACCELERATION BY CASCADING RECONNECTION IN THE SOLAR CORONA. II. RESISTIVE ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS , 2016 .

[14]  F. Pegoraro,et al.  Double-reconnected magnetic structures driven by Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices at the Earth's magnetosphere , 2015 .

[15]  P. Delamere,et al.  Asymmetric Kelvin‐Helmholtz propagation at Saturn's dayside magnetopause , 2015 .

[16]  Joachim Raeder,et al.  Ubiquity of Kelvin–Helmholtz waves at Earth's magnetopause , 2014, Nature Communications.

[17]  P. Gibbon,et al.  Introduction to Plasma Physics , 2017, 2007.04783.

[18]  R. Keppens,et al.  MPI-AMRVAC FOR SOLAR AND ASTROPHYSICS , 2014, 1407.2052.

[19]  F. Pegoraro,et al.  Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices and double mid-latitude reconnection at the Earth's magnetopause: Comparison between observations and simulations , 2014 .

[20]  P. Delamere,et al.  Interaction of magnetic reconnection and Kelvin‐Helmholtz modes for large magnetic shear: 1. Kelvin‐Helmholtz trigger , 2014 .

[21]  Copenhagen,et al.  Nonlinear evolution of the magnetized Kelvin-Helmholtz instability : From fluid to kinetic modeling , 2013, 1310.7707.

[22]  H. Karimabadi,et al.  Three‐dimensional dynamics of vortex‐induced reconnection and comparison with THEMIS observations , 2013 .

[23]  D. Sibeck,et al.  Energetic particle dynamics in Mercury's magnetosphere , 2013 .

[24]  Robert Rankin,et al.  Dawn–dusk asymmetry in the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at Mercury , 2013, Nature Communications.

[25]  F. Pegoraro,et al.  Double mid-latitude dynamical reconnection at the magnetopause: An efficient mechanism allowing solar wind to enter the Earth's magnetosphere , 2012 .

[26]  Matteo Faganello,et al.  Magnetic reconnection and Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities at the Earth's magnetopause , 2012 .

[27]  Rony Keppens,et al.  Parallel, grid-adaptive approaches for relativistic hydro and magnetohydrodynamics , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[28]  R. Wilson,et al.  Kelvin‐Helmholtz instability at Saturn's magnetopause: Hybrid simulations , 2011 .

[29]  Chunmiao Wang,et al.  Global MHD simulation of the Kelvin‐Helmholtz instability at the magnetopause for northward interplanetary magnetic field , 2010 .

[30]  M. Fujimoto,et al.  Magnetic effects on the coalescence of Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[31]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  THEMIS multi‐spacecraft observations of magnetosheath plasma penetration deep into the dayside low‐latitude magnetosphere for northward and strong By IMF , 2008 .

[32]  M. Hudson,et al.  Global MHD test particle simulations of >10 MeV radiation belt electrons during storm sudden commencement , 2007 .

[33]  D. Gurnett,et al.  Introduction to Plasma Physics: Introduction , 2005 .

[34]  H. Hasegawa,et al.  Transport of solar wind into Earth's magnetosphere through rolled-up Kelvin–Helmholtz vortices , 2004, Nature.

[35]  P. Comte,et al.  The two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic Kelvin–Helmholtz instability: Compressibility and large-scale coalescence effects , 2003, astro-ph/0403125.

[36]  K. Nykyri,et al.  Plasma transport at the magnetospheric boundary due to reconnection in Kelvin‐Helmholtz vortices , 2001 .

[37]  R. Keppens,et al.  Growth and saturation of the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability with parallel and antiparallel magnetic fields , 1999, Journal of Plasma Physics.

[38]  Daan Hubert,et al.  Electron density at the subsolar magnetopause for high magnetic , 1998 .

[39]  M. Mahjouri Simulation of charged particle motion in Jupiter's magnetosphere. , 1997 .

[40]  G. Paschmann The Earth's magnetopause. , 1991 .

[41]  A. Miura,et al.  Nonlocal stability analysis of the MHD Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in a compressible plasma. [solar wind-magnetosphere interaction] , 1982 .

[42]  T. Birmingham Charged particle motions in the distended magnetospheres of Jupiter and Saturn , 1982 .

[43]  J. Dungey Waves and Particles in the Magnetosphere , 1969 .

[44]  J. Pain Plasma Physics , 1968, Nature.

[45]  F. R. Scott,et al.  The Adiabatic Motion of Charged Particles , 1964 .

[46]  S. Chandrasekhar Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability , 1961 .

[47]  P. O. Vandervoort The relativistic motion of a charged particle in an inhomogeneous electromagnetic field , 1960 .