Evaluating perceived quality of traffic information system using structural equation modeling

Megacities worldwide have been employing some form of traffic information systems to manage their road network and to mitigate congestion. However, the full benefits of such systems can only be achieved if drivers perceive the system to be of adequate quality for them to actually use the disseminated information in their travel choices. One way to evaluate the underlying quality of the system is to conduct questionnaire survey, gather direct driver feedback and perform statistical analyses to derive attributes or indicators such as driver awareness, utilization of traffic information and perceived effectiveness which are useful to agencies for their planning and management activities. However many past works have treated the attributes to be independent and did not offer a complete picture on the perceived quality of the traffic information system. This paper therefore presents the development of a holistic structural equation model that can consider all potential attributes affecting perceived quality in a single framework. Attributes considered in the paper include: driver awareness, driver utilization, perceived effectiveness, expectation, and perceived necessity of the system. Using the traffic information system in Klang Valley, Malaysia as a case study, it is demonstrated that there are causal and cross-loading relationships between the attributes contributing to perceived system quality and the attributes must be considered in a comprehensive manner. In addition, the model offers a useful interpretation on the factors affecting road user perception on the traffic information system, thereby allowing agencies to undertake appropriate measures to further improve the level of user satisfaction.

[1]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Automatic control methods applied to freeway network traffic , 1993, Autom..

[2]  Kasem Choocharukul Effects of Attitudes and Socioeconomic and Travel Characteristics on Stated Route Diversion , 2008 .

[3]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Questionnaire surveys to evaluate user response to variable message signs in an urban network , 2007 .

[4]  Timothy J. Tardiff,et al.  Causal inferences involving transportation attitudes and behavior , 1977 .

[5]  Youngbin Yim,et al.  LINK FLOW EVALUATION USING LOOP DETECTOR DATA: TRAVELER RESPONSE TO VARIABLE-MESSAGE SIGNS , 1996 .

[6]  Peter Bonsall,et al.  Driver response to variable message signs: a stated preference investigation , 1997 .

[7]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Surveying commuter behavior: designing motorist information systems , 1991 .

[8]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[9]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Some Factors Affecting the Success of Specification Searches in Covariance Structure Modeling. , 1988, Multivariate behavioral research.

[10]  R. Pendyala,et al.  A structural equations analysis of commuters' activity and travel patterns , 2001 .

[11]  A. Caroline Sutandi Evaluation of The Impacts of VMS on Traffic Performance Measures in An Urban Area in Indonesia , 2008 .

[12]  Chao Meng,et al.  Effects of Variable Message Signs (VMS) for Improving Congestions , 2008, 2008 International Workshop on Modelling, Simulation and Optimization.

[13]  Satoshi Fujii,et al.  Anticipated Travel Time, Information Acquisition, and Actual Experience: Hanshin Expressway Route Closure, Osaka-Sakai, Japan , 2000 .

[14]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Within-Household Allocation of Travel: Case of Upper Austria , 2001 .

[15]  Peter Bonsall The influence of route guidance advice on route choice in urban networks , 1992 .

[16]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  USING STATED PREFERENCE DATA FOR STUDYING THE EFFECT OF ADVANCED TRAFFIC INFORMATION ON DRIVERS' ROUTE CHOICE , 1997 .

[17]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  Wei Wang,et al.  Analyzing Travelers’ Intention to Accept Travel Information , 2010 .

[19]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Within household allocation of travel - the case of upper Austria: paper submitted for presentaion at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 2001 , 2002 .

[20]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[21]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Commuters' enroute diversion and return decisions: Analysis and implications for advanced traveler information systems , 1993 .

[22]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  A Vehicle Use Forecasting Model Based on Revealed and Stated Vehicle Type Choice and Utilisation Data , 1997 .

[23]  Adib Kanafani,et al.  The partitioning of long haul air traffic—A study in multinomial choice , 1977 .

[24]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGNS , 1994 .

[25]  Jane Lappin,et al.  Why don't more people use advanced traveler information? Evidence from the Seattle area , 2005 .

[26]  Chungwon Lee,et al.  Evaluation of driver satisfaction of travel information on variable message signs using fuzzy aggregation , 2008 .

[27]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Traveler Response to New Dynamic Information Sources: Analyzing Corridor and Areawide Behavioral Surveys , 2002 .

[28]  R. Hoyle Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[29]  T Morikawa,et al.  DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS WITH LATENT VARIABLES USING SUBJECTIVE DATA (CHAPTER 24 OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH: UPDATING THE STATE OF PLAY) , 1998 .

[30]  Zhong-Ren Peng,et al.  Motorist Response to Arterial Variable Message Signs , 2004 .

[31]  Jorge Ramos,et al.  Content of Variable Message Signs and On-Line Driver Behavior , 2000 .

[32]  D. Hensher,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions and australian commuters’ attitudes and behavior concerning abatement policies and personal involvement , 1997 .

[33]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Variable message signs and radio traffic information: An integrated empirical analysis of drivers' route choice behaviour , 1996 .

[34]  Chris Caplice,et al.  Aspects of commuting behavior: Preferred arrival time, use of information and switching propensity , 1992 .

[35]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling For Travel Behavior Research , 2001 .

[36]  Yu-Hsin Liu,et al.  Route switching behavior on freeways with the provision of different types of real-time traffic information , 2005 .

[37]  R. Hoyle The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. , 1995 .