Visual Acuity, Refractive Error, and Endothelial Cell Density 6 and 12 Months After Deep Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty

Purpose: To report the visual acuity, refractive outcome, and endothelial cell density (ECD) up to 1 year after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) in a large prospective series. Methods: Eighty-six DLEK procedures were performed and evaluated in a prospective interventional case series. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare results from large-incision (9 mm) DLEK (n = 7), small-incision (5-8 mm) DLEK (n = 70), and penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) conversion (n = 9). Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), manifest refraction, corneal topographic astigmatism, and ECD. Results: The percentage of eyes that achieved a BCVA of 20/40 or better after DLEK was 55% at 6 months, increasing to 61% at 1 year. Topographic astigmatism and spherical equivalent were not significantly different than preoperative measurements up to 1 year after DLEK (P > 0.05). An endothelial cell loss of 40% at 6 months and 48% by 1 year was observed. The mean ECD after DLEK was 1831 ± 472 cells per square millimeter at 6 months and 1569 ± 601 cells per square millimeter at 12 months. When evaluated by incision size, the ECD was better at 2066 ± 558 cells per square millimeter with a 9-mm incision compared with only 1516 ± 585 cells per square millimeter with a smaller incision at 1 year, although this did not reach significance (P = 0.075). The endothelial cell loss after penetrating keratoplasty conversion was similar to that in the large-incision group (P > 0.05). Conclusions: DLEK provides good visual acuity (≥20/40) for the majority of patients at 1 year with stable refractive error compared with baseline. Refractive stability was observed with both large- and small-incision DLEKs; however, worrisome endothelial cell loss was observed, especially with a small-incision technique.

[1]  I. Dapena,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: review of the first 50 consecutive cases , 2009, Eye.

[2]  Christopher G. Stoeger,et al.  Endothelial Keratoplasty: The Influence of Insertion Techniques and Incision Size on Donor Endothelial Survival , 2009, Cornea.

[3]  I. Bahar,et al.  Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[4]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Donor age and corneal endothelial cell loss 5 years after successful corneal transplantation. Specular microscopy ancillary study results. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[5]  D. Rootman,et al.  Five-Millimeter-Incision Deep Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty: One-Year Results , 2007, Cornea.

[6]  M. Terry,et al.  A prospective study of endothelial cell loss during the 2 years after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[7]  M. Terry.  Endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcomes in the two years following deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). , 2007, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[8]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[9]  G. Melles.  Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. , 2006, Cornea.

[10]  M. Terry,et al.  Histology of Dislocations in Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK and DLEK): A Laboratory-Based, Surgical Solution to Dislocation in 100 Consecutive DSEK Cases , 2006, Cornea.

[11]  P. Padmanabhan,et al.  Initial results of small incision deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK). , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  M. Terry,et al.  Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[13]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. , 2005, Journal of refractive surgery.

[14]  M. Terry,et al.  Stability of vision, topography, and endothelial cell density from 1 year to 2 years after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty surgery. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[15]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Corneal endothelium and postoperative outcomes 15 years after penetrating keratoplasty. , 2005, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[16]  P. Mulder,et al.  Endothelial cell density after posterior lamellar keratoplasty (Melles techniques): 3 years follow-up. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  G. Melles,et al.  Sutureless, Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty: A Case Report of a Modified Technique. , 2002, Cornea.

[18]  M. Terry,et al.  Deep Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty in the First United States Patients: Early Clinical Results , 2001, Cornea.

[19]  M. Terry,et al.  Endothelial Replacement Without Surface Corneal Incisions or Sutures: Topography of the Deep Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty Procedure , 2001, Cornea.

[20]  M. Böhnke,et al.  Prospective, randomized clinical evaluation of Optisol vs organ culture corneal storage media. , 2000, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  P. Binder,et al.  Posterior lamellar keratoplasty for a case of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. , 1999, American journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  E. Pels,et al.  A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. , 1998, Cornea.

[23]  R. Laing,et al.  A randomized, prospective, double-masked clinical trial of Optisol vs DexSol corneal storage media. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  W. F. Harris,et al.  Mean visual acuity , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[25]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[26]  C. Tillett.  Posterior lamellar keratoplasty. , 2007 .