Training children aged 5–10 years in compliance control: tracing smaller figures yields better learning not specific to the scale of drawn figures

Previously we developed a method that supports active movement generation to allow practice with improvement of good compliance control in tracing and drawing. We showed that the method allowed children with motor impairments to improve at a 3D tracing task to become as proficient as typically developing children and that the training improved 2D figure copying. In this study, we expanded the training protocol to include a wider variety of ages (5–10-year-olds) and we made the figures traced in training the same as in figure copying, but varied the scale of training and copying figures to assess the generality of learning. Forty-eight children were assigned to groups trained using large or small figures. All were tested before training with a tracing task and a copying task. Then, the children trained over five sessions in the tracing task with either small or large figures. Finally, the tracing and copying tasks were tested again following training. A mean speed measure was used to control for path length variations in the timed task. Performance on both tasks at both baseline and posttest varied as a function of the size of the figure and age. In addition, tracing performance also varied with the level of support. In particular, speeds were higher with more support, larger figures and older children. After training, performance improved. Speeds increased. In tracing, performance improved more for large figures traced by children who trained on large figures. In copying, however, performance only improved significantly for children who had trained on small figures and it improved equally for large and small figures. In conclusion, training by tracing smaller figures yielded better learning that was not, however, specific to the scale of drawn figures. Small figures exhibit greater mean curvature. We infer that it yielded better general improvement.

[1]  S. Graham,et al.  Teaching Spelling in the Primary Grades: A National Survey of Instructional Practices and Adaptations , 2008 .

[2]  N. Hogan.  Mechanical Impedance of Single- and Multi-Articular Systems , 1990 .

[3]  S. Graham.  The Role of Production Factors in Learning Disabled Students' Compositions. , 1990 .

[4]  K. Adolph,et al.  4 Motor Development , 2015 .

[5]  William H. Warren,et al.  On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action , 2015, Vision Research.

[6]  J. Foley.  The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1968 .

[7]  K M Newell,et al.  Coordinating visual and kinaesthetic memory codes. , 1979, British journal of psychology.

[8]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  A Sensorimotor Approach to the Training of Manual Actions in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder , 2013, Journal of child neurology.

[9]  Anna L. Barnett,et al.  Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 , 2019 .

[10]  P. Viviani,et al.  The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[11]  Merton Pa.  How we control the contraction of our muscles. , 1972 .

[12]  Martin C. Levesley,et al.  A new tool for assessing human movement: The Kinematic Assessment Tool , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  S. Graham,et al.  Writing Legibly and Quickly: A Study of Children's Ability To Adjust Their Handwriting To Meet Common Classroom Demands. , 1998 .

[14]  Christopher Best,et al.  Motor constancy and the upsizing of handwriting. , 2009, Human movement science.

[15]  Neural substrates of sensorimotor processes: letter writing and letter perception. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Bruce Saddler,et al.  How do primary grade teachers teach handwriting? A national survey , 2008 .

[17]  C. Hofsten.  Prospective Control: A Basic Aspect of Action Development , 1993 .

[18]  Dido Green,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Revised Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire , 2009, Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics.

[19]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  Active Prospective Control Is Required for Effective Sensorimotor Learning , 2013, PloS one.

[20]  Neville Hogan,et al.  The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Asha V Asher.  Handwriting instruction in elementary schools. , 2006, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[22]  Andriy Myronenko,et al.  Point Set Registration: Coherent Point Drift , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[23]  Karin H. James,et al.  Brain activation patterns resulting from learning letter forms through active self-production and passive observation in young children , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[24]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Development of Handwriting Speed and Legibility in Grades 1–9 , 1998 .

[25]  L Proteau,et al.  A Sensorimotor Basis for Motor Learning: Evidence Indicating Specificity of Practice , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  Steve Graham,et al.  Almost 30 Years of Writing Research: Making Sense of it All with The Wrath of Khan , 2009 .

[27]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and strings , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[28]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Training Compliance Control Yields Improvements in Drawing as a Function of Beery Scores , 2014, PloS one.

[29]  Winona Snapp-Childs,et al.  Progressive reduction versus fixed level of support during training: When less is less. , 2016, Human movement science.