On the Use of the Coefficient of Variation as a Measure of Diversity

The coefficient of variation (V) is a statistical measure commonly used for comparing diversity in work groups. It has been employed by organizational researchers to index the relative internal variability of top-management teams, task groups, boards of directors, departments, and other social aggregates on numerous dimensions. Commenting on its widespread application, this article reviews cautions and pitfalls associated with its use for this purpose. Research implications associated with using V are also discussed.

[1]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[2]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Who Shall Succeed? How CEO/Board Preferences and Power Affect the Choice of New CEOs , 1996 .

[3]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication , 1994 .

[4]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  Measuring Population Diversity , 1969 .

[5]  W. W. Stine,et al.  Meaningful inference: The role of measurement in statistics. , 1989 .

[6]  C. R. Hinings,et al.  Values and Organizational Structure , 1996 .

[7]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Organizational demography and culture: Insights from a formal model and simulation. , 1998 .

[8]  S. Stewman.  Organizational demography. , 1988, Annual review of sociology.

[9]  S. Jackson,et al.  Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. , 1991 .

[10]  Louis N. Gray,et al.  Measurement of Relative Variation: Sociological Examples , 1971 .

[11]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[12]  Heather A. Haveman.  The Demographic Metabolism of Organizations: Industry Dynamics, Turnover, and Tenure Distributions , 1995 .

[13]  J. Michell.  Measurement scales and statistics: A clash of paradigms. , 1986 .

[14]  A. Murray.  Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance , 1989 .

[15]  A. Agresti,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Qualitative Variation , 1978 .

[16]  A. Bedeian,et al.  The Significance of Congruence Coefficients: A Comment and Statistical Test , 1988 .

[17]  R. Keller,et al.  Technology-Information Processing Fit and the Performance of R&D Project Groups: A Test of Contingency Theory , 1994 .

[18]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change , 1992 .

[19]  James B. Shaw,et al.  The Effects of Diversity on Small Work Group Processes and Performance , 1998 .

[20]  Sara L. Keck.  Top Management Team Structure: Differential Effects by Environmental Context , 1997 .

[21]  Regression analysis of inequality measures applied to interval scales , 1982 .

[22]  Michael G. Lacy,et al.  Statistics of Ordinal Variation , 2000 .

[23]  Philip B. Coulter,et al.  Measuring Inequality: A Methodological Handbook , 1989 .

[24]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. , 1984 .

[25]  M. Smithson.  On relative dispersion: A new solution for some old problems , 1982 .

[26]  John G. Michel,et al.  DIVERSIFICATION POSTURE AND TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM CHARACTERISTICS , 1992 .

[27]  P. Allison.  Measures of Inequality , 1978 .

[28]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[29]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[30]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Who Shall Govern? CEO/Board Power, Demographic Similarity, and New Director Selection , 1995 .

[31]  W. Boeker.  Strategic Change: The Influence Of Managerial Characteristics And Organizational Growth , 1997 .

[32]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus , 1999 .

[33]  Allan Bird,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY IN JAPANESE FIRMS: GROUP HETEROGENEITY, INDIVIDUAL DISSIMILARITY, AND TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM TURNOVER , 1993 .

[34]  Rein Taagepera,et al.  A Generalized Index of Concentration , 1977 .

[35]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups , 1996 .

[36]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[37]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Do Managers and Strategies Matter? A Study In Crisis* , 1996 .

[38]  L. H. Pelled.  Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[39]  Barbara S. Lawrence,et al.  Perspective---The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[40]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Environmental and Organizational Context and Executive Team Structure , 1993 .

[41]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  Top Management Team Size, CEO Dominance, and firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of Environmental Turbulence and Discretion , 1993 .

[42]  B. Lawrence.  The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[43]  Efrat Elron.  Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity , 1997 .

[44]  Rita D. Kosnik.  Effects of Board Demography and Directors' Incentives on Corporate Greenmail Decisions , 1990 .