Very early endothelial cell loss after penetrating keratoplasty with organ-cultured corneas

Aims After keratoplasty, postoperative endothelial cell loss is calculated between the eye bank endothelial cell density (ebECD) and the postoperative specular microscopy (SM). To elucidate the very early cell loss, always described after penetrating keratoplasty (PK), we designed two complementary studies. Methods (1) Clinical prospective study of 90 consecutive PKs (keratoconus, Fuchs’ corneal dystrophy, lattice dystrophy, bullous keratopathy) with organ-cultured corneas and postoperative follow-up by SM at day 5 (D5), D15, month 1 (M1) and M3. This series provided a quantification of the difference between ebECD performed 2 days before graft and very early postoperative ECD. (2) Ten pairs of corneas with comparable ebECD in both corneas and same organ-culture (OC) duration were randomised: one cornea was grafted, and, at the same time, the viable ECD (vECD) of the other was measured after labelling with Hoechst/ethidium/calcein-AM. The relationship between vECD and very early postoperative ECD was studied. Results vECD at the time of graft did not differ from ECD 5 days after PK, with a difference of 39 (−356; 355) cells/mm2 (median (10°; 90° percentile, p=0.799)), whereas a significant difference of 755 (359; 1146) cells/mm2, corresponding to 28% (95% CI 26 to 30) of cells, was measured between ebECD and ECD 5 days after PK (p<0.001). Conclusions In OC, ebECD provided to surgeons significantly overestimate the number of viable ECs grafted to patients. The absence of difference between the vECD at D0 and ECD at D5 indicates that the very early endothelial cell loss is almost negligible in recipients.

[1]  P. Calhoun,et al.  Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty: Ten-Year Endothelial Cell Loss Compared with Penetrating Keratoplasty. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[2]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  A mathematical model to predict endothelial cell density following penetrating keratoplasty with selective dropout from graft failure. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  P. Binder,et al.  What Happens to the Corneal Transplant Endothelium After Penetrating Keratoplasty? , 2014, Cornea.

[4]  Gilles Thuret,et al.  CorneaJ: An ImageJ Plugin for Semi-Automated Measurement of Corneal Endothelial Cell Viability , 2014, Cornea.

[5]  P. Gain,et al.  Comparison of Endothelial Cell Density of Organ Cultured Corneas With Cornea Donor Study , 2014, Cornea.

[6]  G. Fouquet,et al.  Autograft and allograft , 2014 .

[7]  F. Carley,et al.  The suitability of corneas stored by organ culture for penetrating keratoplasty and influence of donor and recipient factors on 5-year graft survival. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  P. Gain,et al.  Very Early Endothelial Cell Loss After Simultaneous Corneal Autograft and Allograft , 2014, Cornea.

[9]  John R. Smith,et al.  What happens where? , 2013, GeoMM '13.

[10]  P. Gain,et al.  Poloxamines for Deswelling of Organ-Cultured Corneas , 2012, Ophthalmic Research.

[11]  P. Gain,et al.  Pan-corneal endothelial viability assessment: application to endothelial grafts predissected by eye banks. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  S. Böhringer,et al.  Long-Term Graft Survival in Penetrating Keratoplasty: The Biexponential Model of Chronic Endothelial Cell Loss Revisited , 2010, Cornea.

[13]  Gilles Thuret,et al.  Endothelial morphometry by image analysis of corneas organ cultured at 31 degrees C. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  Alan Sugar,et al.  Endothelial cell density to predict endothelial graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. , 2010, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  P. Böelle,et al.  Predicted long-term outcome of corneal transplantation. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[16]  M. Moshirfar,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Trephining Donor Corneal Buttons: Endothelial Cell Loss and Microscopic Ultrastructural Evaluation , 2009, Current eye research.

[17]  M. Terry,et al.  Endothelial Keratoplasty: The Influence of Preoperative Donor Endothelial Cell Densities on Dislocation, Primary Graft Failure, and 1-Year Cell Counts , 2008, Cornea.

[18]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Donor age and corneal endothelial cell loss 5 years after successful corneal transplantation. Specular microscopy ancillary study results. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[19]  P. Gain,et al.  Use of poloxamers for deswelling of organ-cultured corneas. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  Gilles Thuret,et al.  Comparison of two semiautomated methods for evaluating endothelial cells of eye bank corneas. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  P. Gain,et al.  Reproducibility of endothelial assessment during corneal organ culture: comparison of a computer-assisted analyzer with manual methods. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  A. Kaminska,et al.  In vivo confocal microscopy of corneal grafts shortly after penetrating keratoplasty. , 2007, European Journal of Ophthalmology.

[23]  U. Pleyer,et al.  Risk factors for endothelial cell loss post-keratoplasty. , 2006, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[24]  P. Gain,et al.  Standard microlithographic mosaics to assess endothelial cell counting methods by light microscopy in eye banks using organ culture. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  Gilles Thuret,et al.  Animal compound-free medium and poloxamer for human corneal organ culture and deswelling. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Corneal endothelium and postoperative outcomes 15 years after penetrating keratoplasty. , 2005, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[27]  Andrew D Dick,et al.  Predicting endothelial cell loss and long-term corneal graft survival. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  P. Gain,et al.  Prospective, Randomized Clinical and Endothelial Evaluation of 2 Storage Times for Corneal Donor Tissue in Organ Culture at 31°C , 2003 .

[29]  P. Gain,et al.  Prospective, randomized clinical and endothelial evaluation of 2 storage times for cornea donor tissue in organ culture at 31 degrees C. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[30]  P. Gain,et al.  Automated tri-image analysis of stored corneal endothelium , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[31]  M. Böhnke,et al.  Prospective, randomized clinical evaluation of Optisol vs organ culture corneal storage media. , 2000, Archives of ophthalmology.

[32]  M. Boulton,et al.  Endothelial viability of organ-cultured corneas following penetrating keratoplasty , 1998, Eye.

[33]  M. Baudrimont,et al.  Evaluation of the Deswelling Period in Dextran‐Containing Medium After Corneal Organ Culture , 1997, Cornea.

[34]  M. Böhnke,et al.  [Development of endothelium cell density using fresh and organ cultured tissue. 5 years after penetrating keratoplasty]. , 1997, Der Ophthalmologe.

[35]  R. Winter,et al.  Entwicklung der Endothelzelldichte bei Verwendung von frischem und organkultiviertem Gewebe 5 Jahre nach perforierender Keratoplastik * , 1997, Der Ophthalmologe.

[36]  M. Böhnke,et al.  Effect of the cutting procedure on the vitality of corneal endothelium in donor material. , 1982, Ophthalmic research.

[37]  Damiano Re,et al.  Trephination of donor corneal buttons: a scanning electron microscopic study. , 1978 .

[38]  R. O. Schultz,et al.  Trephination of donor corneal buttons: a scanning electron microscopic study. , 1978, Annals of Ophthalmology.

[39]  M. Balls,et al.  Organ culture , 1975, Nature.