Uncertainties in the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Heights: Insights from the Indian Himalaya and Peninsula

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Digital Terrain Elevation Data (DTED) are used with the consensus view that it has a minimum vertical accuracy of 16 m absolute error at 90% confidence (Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 9.73 m) world-wide. However, vertical accuracy of the data decreases with increase in slope and elevation due to presence of large outliers and voids. Therefore, studies using SRTM data “as is”, especially in regions like the Himalaya, are not statistically meaningful. New data from ~200 high-precision static Global Position System (GPS) Independent Check Points (ICPs) in the Himalaya and Peninsular India indicate that only 1-arc X-Band data are usable “as is” in the Himalaya as it has height accuracy of 9.18 m (RMSE). In contrast, recently released (2014–2015) “as-is” 1-arc and widely used 3-arc C-Band data have a height accuracy of RMSE 23.53 m and 47.24 m and need to be corrected before use. Outlier and void filtering improves the height accuracy to RMSE 8 m, 10.14 m, 14.38 m for 1-arc X and C-Band and 3-arc C-Band data respectively. Our study indicates that the C-Band 90 m and 30 m DEMs are well-aligned and without any significant horizontal offset implying that area and length computations using both the datasets have identical values.

[1]  T. Herring,et al.  Introduction to GAMIT/GLOBK , 2006 .

[2]  A geomorphometric analysis of Poland based on the SRTM-3 data , 2012 .

[3]  H. S. Gusain,et al.  Estimation of net shortwave radiation flux of western Himalayan snow cover during clear sky days using remote sensing and meteorological data , 2014 .

[4]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[5]  Tim R. McVicar,et al.  The impact of misregistration on SRTM and DEM image differences , 2008 .

[6]  Z. Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2005 : A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame based on time series of station positions and Earth Orientation Parameters , 2007 .

[7]  J. R. Scotti,et al.  Available From , 1973 .

[8]  R. Rapp Use of potential coefficient models for geoid undulation determinations using a spherical harmonic representation of the height anomaly/geoid undulation difference , 1997 .

[9]  E. Rodríguez,et al.  A Global Assessment of the SRTM Performance , 2006 .

[10]  Marian Werner,et al.  Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Mission Overview , 2001 .

[11]  Jakob van Zyl,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM): a breakthrough in remote sensing of topography , 2001 .

[12]  B. Menounos,et al.  Recent volume loss of British Columbian glaciers, Canada , 2007 .

[13]  R. Sinha,et al.  Interplay between faulting and base level in the development of Himalayan frontal fold topography , 2011 .

[14]  Richard S. Williams Book review: Remote sensing of mountain glaciers and permafrost creep , 2007, Journal of Glaciology.

[15]  Modelling soil particle-size distribution in the region 'Centre' (France) , 2014 .

[16]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Author contributions , 2021 .

[17]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96 , 1998 .

[18]  K. N. Tiwari,et al.  A comparative appraisal of hydrological behavior of SRTM DEM at catchment level , 2014 .

[19]  Andrew Jarvis,et al.  Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4 , 2008 .

[20]  R. Keys Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing , 1981 .

[21]  Bijeesh Kozhikkodan Veettil,et al.  Recent changes occurred in the terminus of the Debriscovered Bilafond Glacier in the Karakoram Himalayas using remotely sensed images and digital elevation models (1978–2011) , 2014, Journal of Mountain Science.

[22]  Richard Bamler,et al.  The SRTM Mission - A World-Wide 30 m Resolution DEM from SAR Interferometry in 11 Days , 1999 .

[23]  A. Grondona,et al.  Recent Changes Occurred in the Terminus of the Debris- covered Bilafond Glacier in the Karakoram Himalayas Using Remotely Sensed Images and Digital Elevation Models (1978-2011) , 2014 .

[24]  M. Mukul,et al.  Out-of-sequence reactivation of the Munsiari thrust in the Relli River basin, Darjiling Himalaya, India: Insights from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission digital elevation model-based geomorphic indices , 2017 .

[25]  John D. Vona,et al.  Vegetation height estimation from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission and National Elevation Datasets , 2004 .

[26]  Michael Eineder,et al.  Surface elevation changes of glaciers derived from SRTM and TanDEM-X DEM differences , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS.

[27]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[28]  A. Roth,et al.  The shuttle radar topography mission—a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar , 2003 .

[29]  Thomas A. Hennig,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2001, Digital Earth Moving.

[30]  Pierre Briole,et al.  SRTM 3″ DEM (versions 1, 2, 3, 4) validation by means of extensive kinematic GPS measurements: a case study from North Greece , 2010 .

[31]  R. Sinha,et al.  Avulsion threshold and planform dynamics of the Kosi River in north Bihar (India) and Nepal: A GIS framework , 2014 .

[32]  C. Chakraborty,et al.  Morpho-sedimentary characteristics of the Quaternary Matiali fan and associated river terraces, Jalpaiguri, India: Implications for climatic controls , 2014 .

[33]  A. K. Karwel,et al.  ESTIMATION OF THE ACCURACY OF THE SRTM TERRAIN MODEL ON THE AREA OF POLAND , 2012 .

[34]  Natalia Kolecka,et al.  Assessment of the Accuracy of SRTM C- and X-Band High Mountain Elevation Data: a Case Study of the Polish Tatra Mountains , 2014, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[35]  David P. Doane,et al.  Measuring Skewness: A Forgotten Statistic? , 2011 .

[36]  Pascal Peduzzi,et al.  Assessing high altitude glacier thickness, volume and area changes using field, GIS and remote sensing techniques: the case of Nevado Coropuna (Peru) , 2010 .

[37]  Y. B. Wah,et al.  Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk , Kolmogorov-Smirnov , Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests , 2011 .

[38]  Sabu Joseph,et al.  Sensitivity of digital elevation models: The scenario from two tropical mountain river basins of the Western Ghats, India , 2014 .

[39]  A. Kääb,et al.  Co-registration and bias corrections of satellite elevation data sets for quantifying glacier thickness change , 2011 .

[40]  Charles M. Meertens,et al.  TEQC: The Multi-Purpose Toolkit for GPS/GLONASS Data , 1999, GPS Solutions.

[41]  Yuri Gorokhovich,et al.  Accuracy assessment of the processed SRTM-based elevation data by CGIAR using field data from USA and Thailand and its relation to the terrain characteristics , 2006 .

[42]  Hannes Isaak Reuter,et al.  An evaluation of void‐filling interpolation methods for SRTM data , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[43]  M. Mukul,et al.  Analysis of the accuracy of Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) height models using International Global Navigation Satellite System Service (IGS) Network , 2015, Journal of Earth System Science.

[44]  Martijn P. F. Berger,et al.  Exploring Task- and Student-Related Factors in the Method of Propositional Manipulation (MPM) , 2011 .

[45]  D. Cramer The Sage dictionary of statistics , 2004 .