New Statistical Model for Variability of Aerosol Optical Thickness: Theory and Application to MODIS Data over Ocean.

A novel model for the variability in aerosol optical thickness (AOT) is presented. This model is based on the consideration of AOT fields as realizations of a stochastic process, that is the exponent of an underlying Gaussian process with a specific autocorrelation function. In this approach AOT fields have lognormal PDFs and structure functions having the correct asymptotic behavior at large scales. The latter is an advantage compared with fractal (scale-invariant) approaches. The simple analytical form of the structure function in the proposed model facilitates its use for the parameterization of AOT statistics derived from remote sensing data. The new approach is illustrated using a year-long global MODIS AOT dataset (over ocean) with 10 km resolution. It was used to compute AOT statistics for sample cells forming a grid with 5° spacing. The observed shapes of the structure functions indicated that in a large number of cases the AOT variability is split into two regimes that exhibit different patterns of behavior: small-scale stationary processes and trends reflecting variations at larger scales. The small-scale patterns are suggested to be generated by local aerosols within the marine boundary layer, while the large-scale trends are indicative of elevated aerosols transported from remote continental sources. This assumption is evaluated by comparison of the geographical distributions of these patterns derived from MODIS data with those obtained from the GISS GCM. This study shows considerable potential to enhance comparisons between remote sensing datasets and climate models beyond regional mean AOTs.

[1]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[2]  S. Emori,et al.  Simulation of climate response to aerosol direct and indirect effects with aerosol transport‐radiation model , 2005 .

[3]  Anthony B. Davis,et al.  Scale Invariance in Liquid Water Distributions in Marine Stratocumulus. Part II: Multifractal Properties and Intermittency Issues , 1997 .

[4]  Anthony B. Davis,et al.  Horizontal structure of marine boundary layer clouds from centimeter to kilometer scales , 1999 .

[5]  A. N. Kolmogorov Equations of turbulent motion in an incompressible fluid , 1941 .

[6]  K. Tsigaridis,et al.  Model‐based estimation of sampling‐caused uncertainty in aerosol remote sensing for climate research applications , 2014 .

[7]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  Marine stratocumulus structure , 1989 .

[8]  日野 寛三,et al.  対数正規分布(Lognormal Distribution)のあてはめについて , 1994 .

[9]  William M. Putman,et al.  Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive , 2014 .

[10]  P. Curran The semivariogram in remote sensing: An introduction , 1988 .

[11]  Robert F. Cahalan,et al.  The Landsat Scale Break in Stratocumulus as a Three-Dimensional Radiative Transfer Effect: Implications for Cloud Remote Sensing , 1997 .

[12]  David M. Winker,et al.  Mesoscale Variations of Tropospheric Aerosols , 2003 .

[13]  T. Eck,et al.  Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target aerosol products over land , 2010 .

[14]  Johannes W. Kaiser,et al.  Aerosol analysis and forecast in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Integrated Forecast System : Forward modeling , 2009 .

[15]  M. Chin,et al.  Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations , 2012 .

[16]  Jose M. Mejia,et al.  Correlation links between normal and log normal processes , 1974 .

[17]  Jens Redemann,et al.  The comparison of MODIS-Aqua (C5) and CALIOP (V2 & V3) aerosol optical depth , 2011 .

[18]  Anthony B. Davis,et al.  Multifractal characterizations of nonstationarity and intermittency in geophysical fields: Observed, retrieved, or simulated , 1994 .

[19]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Towards a New Synthesis , 1980, Canadian Theatre Review.

[20]  Shaun Lovejoy,et al.  Towards a new synthesis for atmospheric dynamics: Space–time cascades , 2010 .

[21]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  An Emerging Global Aerosol Climatology from the MODIS Satellite Sensors , 2008 .

[22]  E. Vermote,et al.  The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products, and Validation , 2005 .

[23]  Mao,et al.  Cloud Simulations in Response to Turbulence Parameterizations in the GISS Model E GCM , 2012 .

[24]  D. Koch,et al.  Air Pollution Radiative Forcing From Specific Emissions Sectors at 2030: Prototype for a New IPCC Bar Chart , 2007 .

[25]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  Global three‐dimensional simulation of aerosol optical thickness distribution of various origins , 2000 .

[26]  H. Treut,et al.  THE CALIPSO MISSION: A Global 3D View of Aerosols and Clouds , 2010 .

[27]  M. Razinger,et al.  Aerosol analysis and forecast in the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Integrated Forecast System: 2. Data assimilation , 2009 .

[28]  A. Lacis,et al.  Scaling Properties of Aerosol Optical Thickness Retrieved from Ground-Based Measurements , 2004 .

[29]  Michael Schulz,et al.  Global dust model intercomparison in AeroCom phase I , 2011 .

[30]  Shaun Lovejoy,et al.  Haar wavelets, fluctuations and structure functions: convenient choices for geophysics , 2012 .

[31]  J. Hansen,et al.  Global warming in the twenty-first century: an alternative scenario. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Thomas L. Bell,et al.  A space‐time stochastic model of rainfall for satellite remote‐sensing studies , 1987 .

[33]  Alexander Ignatov,et al.  The lognormal distribution as a reference for reporting aerosol optical depth statistics; Empirical tests using multi‐year, multi‐site AERONET Sunphotometer data , 2000 .

[34]  Anthony B. Davis,et al.  Scale Invariance of Liquid Water Distributions in Marine Stratocumulus. Part I: Spectral Properties and Stationarity Issues , 1996 .

[35]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data , 2009 .

[36]  D. Winker,et al.  Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms , 2009 .

[37]  W. Collins,et al.  An AeroCom Initial Assessment - Optical Properties in Aerosol Component Modules of Global Models , 2005 .

[38]  G. D. Nastrom,et al.  Theoretical Interpretation of Atmospheric Wavenumber Spectra of Wind and Temperature Observed by Commercial Aircraft During GASP , 1986 .

[39]  D. Lilly Two-dimensional turbulence generated by energy sources at two scales , 1989 .

[40]  Cloud Simulations in Response to Turbulence Parameterizations in the GISS Model E GCM , 2012 .