A Theory-based Model for the Study of Executive Information Systems Adoption by the Top-level Managers

In recent years, a number of organisations have invested heavily in executive information systems (EIS) in order to improve the performance gains of their executives’ roles. Although executives presided over and authorised investment in EIS projects to support their roles, the majority of executives are unenthusiastic about using EIS because of the design flaws and failures of these systems. Studies by Nandhakumar and Jones (1997), McBride (1997) and recently Ditsa (2003) have suggested that the root of the success or failure of EIS can be attributed to social, cultural and organisational factors rather than technical factors alone. To address the problem of the low use of EIS by executives, we use social factors, habits and facilitation conditions from Triandis’(1979) framework to extend the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The model hypothesises that executives’ behaviour positively relates to facilitating conditions, habits and social factors. This paper is a significant contribution to management practice and academic literature.

[1]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[2]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Emmanuel Ikart,et al.  A research framework for the adoption and usage of executive information systems by organisational executives: an exploratory study , 2004 .

[4]  D. DavisFred,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology , 1989 .

[5]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[6]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-User Computing , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[8]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[9]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[10]  N. Carr IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[11]  M. Treacy,et al.  Utilization as a dependent variable in MIS research , 2015, DATB.

[12]  Neil McBride,et al.  The rise and fall of an executive information system: a case study , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[13]  Victor P. Lane Executive Information Systems: Emergence, Development & Impact , 1992, Inf. Syst. J..

[14]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[15]  Donna F. Davis,et al.  The Effect of Training Techniques and Personal Characteristics on Training End Users of Information Systems , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  EIS support for the strategic management process , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Determining information system usage: Some issues and examples , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  Strategic Decision Making: A Framework For Multicriteria Decision Analysis Of Technology Investments And A Field Survey , 1997 .

[19]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  Executive Information Systems: A Framework for Development and a Survey of Current Practices , 1991, MIS Q..

[20]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Decision Support and Expert Systems: Management Support Systems , 1990 .

[22]  M. Fishbein A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications. , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[23]  H C Triandis,et al.  Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[24]  Jeretta Horn Nord,et al.  Executive information systems: A study and comparative analysis , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[25]  H. Triandis Attitude and attitude change , 1971 .

[26]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Attitudes and Management Information System Use , 1979 .

[27]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Determinants of EIS use: Testing a behavioral model, , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[28]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  Designing in the dark: the changing user-developer relationship in information systems development , 1997, ICIS '97.

[29]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Support for the sense-making activity of managers , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  Jose L. Salmeron,et al.  EIS evolution in large Spanish businesses , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[31]  M Milone Implementing an EIS (executive information system), one step at a time. Case study. , 1995, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[32]  En Mao,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF IT USAGE OVER TIME , 2002 .

[33]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Senior and middle management use of EIS: a descriptive study , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  Deepinder S. Bajwa,et al.  Key antecedents of Executive Information System success: a path analytic approach , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Critical success factors revisited: success and failure cases of information systems for senior executives , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[36]  George Ditsa,et al.  Executive information systems use in organisational contexts: an explanatory user behaviour testing , 2003 .

[37]  Hugh J. Watson,et al.  Determinates of EIS acceptance , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[38]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  What does it take for successful executive information systems? , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[39]  Thomas W. Ferratt,et al.  Use and perceived value of computer-based information systems in supporting the decision making of German managers , 2000, SIGCPR '00.

[40]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Empirical Evidence for a Descriptive Model of Implementation , 1978, MIS Q..

[41]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Executive information systems without executives , 1998 .

[42]  Fred D. Davis User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[43]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  Executive information systems: emergence, development, impact , 1992 .

[44]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  Modeling the user acceptance of e-mail , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[45]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  David Targett,et al.  Patterns of senior executives' personal use of computers , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[47]  William H. Money,et al.  Application of the technology acceptance model to a knowledge management system , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.