Assessing the user response to differences in functionality when visualising 3D models of cultural heritage sites using the Technology Readiness Index

Abstract Visualisation of cultural heritage using 3D modelling in situ or over the Internet has increased in recent years. This paper examines people's readiness to accept these and their preferred degree of sophistication using a visualisation video of a 3D model of the Fishbourne Roman Palace in West Sussex, England. Participants viewed six visualisations in a controlled environment that sequentially added features such as texture, sound, lighting and ultimately interaction and mobility via game engine technologies. The updated Technology Readiness Index was used to group participants according to their willingness to accept the visualisations. TRI Explorers appreciated the addition of interactivity while enhanced model fidelity satisfied other groups. Linking the profile of the TRI groups with published survey results relating the characteristics of historical museum visitors suggests that TRI Explorers are not the target demographic negating the need for interactivity, although a museum's visitor profile should also be considered.

[1]  Juan Meng,et al.  Technology Readiness Index (TRI): Assessing Cross-Cultural Validity , 2009 .

[2]  John Manley,et al.  A Pre-A.D. 43 Ditch at Fishbourne Roman Palace, Chichester , 2005, Britannia.

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[4]  Ananthanarayanan Parasuraman,et al.  An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index , 2015 .

[5]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Stephen D. Houston,et al.  Re-Presenting the Past: Archaeology Through Text and Image , 2013 .

[7]  B. Cunliffe,et al.  Fishbourne Roman Palace , 1998, Britannia.

[8]  P. J. Sher,et al.  Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model , 2007 .

[9]  Rohit Verma,et al.  Exploring the Use of the Abbreviated Technology Readiness Index for Hotel Customer Segmentation , 2009 .

[10]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  Sandra Streukens,et al.  The effect of service employees' technology readiness on technology acceptance , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[12]  B. Cunliffe,et al.  Excavations at Fishbourne , 1967 .

[13]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Technology Readiness Index (Tri) , 2000 .

[14]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..