Robustification of nonlinear control systems vis-à-vis actuator dynamics: An immersion and invariance approach

Abstract In this brief note we pose, and solve, the problem of robustification of controller designs where the actuator dynamics was neglected. This situation is very common in applications where, to validate the assumption that the actuator dynamics can be neglected, a high-gain inner-loop that enforces a time-scale separation between the actuator and the plant dynamics is implemented. Of course, the injection of the high-gain has well-known deleterious effects. Moreover, a stability, and robustness, analysis of such a control configuration is usually unavailable. Our first main contribution is to provide an alternative to such a scheme, with provable robust stability properties. The second contribution is to, applying this result, propose a robustification procedure to the industry standard field-oriented control of current-fed induction motors, which is usually implemented neglecting the actuator dynamics, with no rigorous proof of stability available to date. Finally, we propose the first solution of smooth, time-invariant regulation of the dynamic model of a class of nonholonomic systems, that includes the widely popular unicycle example. Simulation examples prove the superior performance of the proposed controller compared with the existing switching and/or time-varying alternatives reported in the literature.

[1]  A. Astolfi Discontinuous control of nonholonomic systems , 1996 .

[2]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  On State Observers for Nonlinear Systems: A New Design and a Unifying Framework , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[3]  Iven M. Y. Mareels,et al.  Indirect field-oriented control of induction motors is robustly globally stable , 1996, Autom..

[4]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Immersion and Invariance Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems Via Virtual and Horizontal Contraction , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Smooth, time‐invariant regulation of nonholonomic systems via energy pumping‐and‐damping , 2018, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control.

[6]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Passivity-based Control of Euler-Lagrange Systems , 1998 .

[7]  Cristiano Maria Verrelli,et al.  Induction Motor Control Design , 2010 .

[8]  Jean-Baptiste Pomet Explicit design of time-varying stabilizing control laws for a class of controllable systems without drift , 1992 .

[9]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Regulation and tracking of the nonholonomic double integrator: A field-oriented control approach , 1998, Autom..

[10]  Yaonan Wang,et al.  Simultaneous Stabilization and Tracking of Nonholonomic Mobile Robots: A Lyapunov-Based Approach , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[11]  Marilena Vendittelli,et al.  Control of Wheeled Mobile Robots: An Experimental Overview , 2001 .

[12]  Alessandro Astolfi,et al.  Nonlinear and adaptive control with applications , 2008 .

[13]  Ilya Kolmanovsky,et al.  Developments in nonholonomic control problems , 1995 .