New technologies call for new strategies for patient education.

[1]  J. Gierula,et al.  To the Editor- New phones, old problem? Interference with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by phones containing magnets. , 2021, Heart rhythm.

[2]  Michael Wu,et al.  Smart wearable device accessories may interfere with implantable cardiac devices , 2020, HeartRhythm case reports.

[3]  L. Neubeck,et al.  Atrial fibrillation self-management: a mobile telephone app scoping review and content analysis. , 2020, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Mitchell,et al.  The educational experiences and needs of patients with an internal cardiac defibrillator: An interpretive phenomenological study , 2020 .

[5]  B. Pieske,et al.  Are Contemporary Smartwatches and Mobile Phones Safe for Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices? , 2020, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[6]  Janet K. Han.  Smartphones, Smartwatches, and CIED Patient Safety: So Far, So Good. , 2020, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[7]  A. Strömberg,et al.  Let the games begin: Serious games in prevention and rehabilitation to improve outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease , 2020, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[8]  Tuomas V Kenttä,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of the EU-CERT-ICD controlled multicentre cohort study , 2020, European heart journal.

[9]  J. Shea,et al.  Unintentional magnet reversion of an implanted cardiac defibrillator by an electronic cigarette , 2020, HeartRhythm Case Reports.

[10]  R. Clark,et al.  Effectiveness of avatar-based technology in patient education for improving chronic disease knowledge and self-care behavior: a systematic review. , 2019, JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports.

[11]  S. Inglis,et al.  An mHealth intervention to improve nurses’ atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation knowledge and practice: the EVICOAG study , 2018, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  J. Baumbusch,et al.  Exploring the patients’ experiences of living with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator , 2018, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  A. Voskoboinik,et al.  Cardiac rhythm management devices , 2018, Australian journal of general practice.

[14]  D. Moser,et al.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) deactivation discussions: Reality versus recommendations , 2016, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  K. Shivkumar,et al.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillators: even better than we thought? , 2015, European heart journal.

[16]  P. Davidson,et al.  Augmented reality, virtual reality and gaming: an integral part of nursing , 2015, Contemporary nurse.

[17]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Readability and Content of Patient Education Material Related to Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators , 2012, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[18]  Katja Zeppenfeld,et al.  Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology countries: 2014 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.