Risk factors in heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning systems for occupant symptoms in US office buildings: the US EPA BASE study.

UNLABELLED Building-related symptoms in office workers worldwide are common, but of uncertain etiology. One cause may be contaminants related to characteristics of heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems. We analyzed data from 97 representative air-conditioned US office buildings in the Building Assessment and Survey Evaluation (BASE) study. Using logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations, we estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals for associations between building-related symptom outcomes and HVAC characteristics. Outdoor air intakes less than 60 m above ground level were associated with significant increases in most symptoms: e.g. for upper respiratory symptoms, OR for intake heights 30 to 60 m, 0 to <30 m, and below ground level were 2.7, 2.0, and 2.1. Humidification systems with poor condition/maintenance were associated with significantly increased upper respiratory symptoms, eye symptoms, fatigue/difficulty concentrating, and skin symptoms, with OR = 1.5, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.6. Less frequent cleaning of cooling coils and drain pans was associated with significantly increased eye symptoms and headache, with OR = 1.7 and 1.6. Symptoms may be due to microbial exposures from poorly maintained ventilation systems and to greater levels of vehicular pollutants at air intakes nearer the ground level. Replication and explanation of these findings is needed. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS These findings support current beliefs that moisture-related HVAC components such as cooling coils and humidification systems, when poorly maintained, may be sources of contaminants that cause adverse health effects in occupants, even if we cannot yet identify or measure the causal exposures. While finding substantially elevated risks for poorly maintained humidification systems, relative to no humidification systems, the findings do not identify important (symptom) benefits from well-maintained humidification systems. Findings also provide an initial suggestion, needing corroboration, that outdoor air intakes lower than 18 stories in office buildings may be associated with substantial increases in many symptoms. If this is corroborated and linked to ground-level vehicle emissions, urban ventilation air intakes may need to be located as far above ground level as possible or to incorporate air cleaners that remove gaseous pollutants.

[1]  W. Fisk,et al.  Association of ventilation rates and CO2 concentrations with health and other responses in commercial and institutional buildings. , 1999, Indoor air.

[2]  David Faulkner,et al.  Indoor Particles and Symptoms Among Office Workers: Results from a Double-Blind Cross-Over Study , 2002, Epidemiology.

[3]  Antonio Colombi,et al.  Height profile of some air quality markers in the urban atmosphere surrounding a 100 m tower building , 1998 .

[4]  S Hercberg,et al.  Workplace air-conditioning and health services attendance among French middle-aged women: a prospective cohort study. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  A. Smith,et al.  Consistent pattern of elevated symptoms in air-conditioned office buildings: a reanalysis of epidemiologic studies. , 1990, American journal of public health.

[6]  K. Kreiss,et al.  Building-related respiratory symptoms can be predicted with semi-quantitative indices of exposure to dampness and mold. , 2004, Indoor air.

[7]  Bert Brunekreef,et al.  Health and Indoor Climate Complaints of 7043 office Workers in 61 Buildings in the Netherlands , 1992 .

[8]  J. D. Spengler,et al.  ESTIMATES OF POTENTIAL NATIONWIDE PRODUCTIVITY AND HEALTH BENEFITS FROM BETTER INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS: AN UPDATE , 1999 .

[9]  O Seppänen,et al.  Association of ventilation system type with SBS symptoms in office workers. , 2002, Indoor air.

[10]  W J Fisk,et al.  Associations between indoor CO2 concentrations and sick building syndrome symptoms in U.S. office buildings: an analysis of the 1994-1996 BASE study data. , 2000, Indoor air.

[11]  M. Mendell,et al.  Indicators of Moisture and Ventilation System Contamination in U.S. Office Buildings as Risk Factors for Respiratory and Mucous Membrane Symptoms: Analyses of the EPA BASE Data , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[12]  Hal Levin,et al.  Improving the health of workers in indoor environments: priority research needs for a national occupational research agenda. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[13]  John D. Spengler,et al.  Indoor Air Quality Handbook , 2000 .

[14]  A Hedge,et al.  Sick building syndrome: a study of 4373 office workers. , 1987, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[15]  James A Hanley,et al.  Effect of ultraviolet germicidal lights installed in office ventilation systems on workers' health and wellbeing: double-blind multiple crossover trial , 2003, The Lancet.

[16]  Kenneth M. Wallingford,et al.  The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Indoor Environmental Evaluation Experience. Part Three: Associations between Environmental Factors and Self-Reported Health Conditions , 1996 .

[17]  M. Mendell,et al.  Environmental risk factors and work-related lower respiratory symptoms in 80 office buildings: an exploratory analysis of NIOSH data. , 2003, American journal of industrial medicine.

[18]  K J Rothman,et al.  No Adjustments Are Needed for Multiple Comparisons , 1990, Epidemiology.

[19]  M. Mendell Commentary: air conditioning as a risk for increased use of health services. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.