Hesitant fuzzy integrated MCDM approach for quality function deployment: a case study in electric vehicle

Quality function deployment (QFD) is a product planning management instrument which has been used in a broad range of industries. However, the traditional QFD method has been criticised much for its deficiencies in acquiring experts’ opinions, weighting customer requirements (CRs) and ranking engineering characteristics (ECs). To overcome the limitations, an integrated analytical model is presented in this study for obtaining the importance ratings of ECs in QFD by integrating decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique and Vlsekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method under hesitant fuzzy environment. In particular, the hesitant fuzzy DEMATEL is used to analyse the interrelationships among CRs and determine their weights, and the hesitant fuzzy VIKOR is utilised to prioritise ECs. Finally, the feasibility and practicality of the proposed method are verified by an example regarding the product development of electric vehicle.

[1]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM Model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management , 2016 .

[3]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Jasmine Siu Lee Lam,et al.  Designing a sustainable maritime supply chain: A hybrid QFD–ANP approach , 2015 .

[5]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE II approach: A new way to handle multi-criteria decision making problems , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[6]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  A projection-based TODIM method under multi-valued neutrosophic environments and its application in personnel selection , 2016, Neural Computing and Applications.

[7]  Jian-qiang Wang,et al.  Novel Multi-criteria Decision-making Approaches Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Prospect Theory , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[8]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  Combined quality function deployment and logical framework analysis to improve quality of emergency care in Malta. , 2016, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[9]  Lu Zhen,et al.  Group multi-criteria supplier selection using an extended VIKOR method with interval 2-tuple linguistic information , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  A. Gabus,et al.  Perceptions of the world problematique: communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility , 1973 .

[11]  Jennifer Blackhurst,et al.  A four-phase AHP–QFD approach for supplier assessment: a sustainability perspective , 2012 .

[12]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: An outranking approach , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[13]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Emad Roghanian,et al.  A framework for sustainable product design: a hybrid fuzzy approach based on Quality Function Deployment for Environment , 2015 .

[16]  Jian-qiang Wang,et al.  An extension of the ELECTRE approach with multi-valued neutrosophic information , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[17]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  VIKOR Technique: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications , 2016 .

[18]  Jianrong Tan,et al.  Quantification for the importance degree of engineering characteristics with a multi-level hierarchical structure in QFD , 2016 .

[19]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Integration of ECQFD and LCA for enabling sustainable product design in an electric vehicle manufacturing organisation , 2011 .

[20]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  A group multi-granularity linguistic-based methodology for prioritizing engineering characteristics under uncertainties , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[21]  Hsing-Pei Kao,et al.  A new integrated fuzzy QFD approach for market segments evaluation and selection , 2015 .

[22]  Zhang-peng Tian,et al.  A Likelihood-Based Qualitative Flexible Approach with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information , 2016, Cognitive Computation.

[23]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  A likelihood-based TODIM approach based on multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic information for evaluation in logistics outsourcing , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[24]  Xiaohong Chen,et al.  Interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy set and its application in multi-criteria decision making , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[25]  Sang-Bing Tsai,et al.  Evaluating the green corporate social responsibility of manufacturing corporations from a green industry law perspective , 2015 .

[26]  Yen-Ting Chen,et al.  Applying GRA and QFD to Improve Library Service Quality , 2011 .

[27]  Jian-Xin You,et al.  Evaluating health-care waste treatment technologies using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model , 2015 .

[28]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making , 2013, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making.

[29]  Hui Li,et al.  Risk assessment in system FMEA combining fuzzy weighted average with fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[30]  Chih-Hsuan Wang,et al.  Incorporating the concept of systematic innovation into quality function deployment for developing multi-functional smart phones , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[31]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  The fuzzy cross-entropy for intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in multi-criteria decision-making , 2015, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[32]  Kouroush Jenab,et al.  Integration of AHP-QFD for selecting facility location , 2015 .

[33]  Chih-Hsuan Wang,et al.  Using quality function deployment to conduct vendor assessment and supplier recommendation for business-intelligence systems , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[34]  Ching-Chan Cheng,et al.  Quality education service: put your feet in their shoes , 2016 .

[35]  Majid Azadi,et al.  A combination of QFD and imprecise DEA with enhanced Russell graph measure: A case study in healthcare , 2013 .

[36]  C. H. Yeh,et al.  Integration of four-phase QFD and TRIZ in product R&D: a notebook case study , 2011 .

[37]  Na Hu,et al.  An extended minimax absolute and relative disparity approach to obtain the OWA operator weights , 2016, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[38]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[39]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  Linguistic hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on evidential reasoning , 2016, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[40]  Mark Goh,et al.  Fuzzy PROMETHEE GDSS for technical requirements ranking in HOQ , 2015 .

[41]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  An overview of methods for determining OWA weights , 2005, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[42]  Yahia Zare Mehrjerdi Quality function deployment and its extensions , 2010 .

[43]  Xinwang Liu,et al.  An analytic approach to obtain the least square deviation OWA operator weights , 2014, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[44]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Uncertain Quality Function Deployment Using a Hybrid Group Decision Making Model , 2016, Symmetry.

[45]  Mohammed Quaddus,et al.  A multi-phased QFD based optimization approach to sustainable service design , 2016 .

[46]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information , 2011, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[47]  Radko Mesiar,et al.  Hesitant L ‐Fuzzy Sets , 2017, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[48]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Improving risk evaluation in FMEA with a hybrid multiple criteria decision making method , 2015 .

[49]  K. Govindaraju,et al.  A distance-based methodology for increased extraction of information from the roof matrices in QFD studies , 2016 .

[50]  Jun Wang,et al.  A new MCDM method combining QFD with TOPSIS for knowledge management system selection from the user's perspective in intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[51]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality function deployment: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[52]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  An outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[53]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic VIKOR Method and Its Application in Qualitative Multiple Criteria Decision Making , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[54]  Hao-Tien Liu,et al.  An improved grey quality function deployment approach using the grey TRIZ technique , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[55]  Liang-Hsuan Chen,et al.  Fuzzy linear programming models for NPD using a four-phase QFD activity process based on the means-end chain concept , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[56]  Joseph J. FrantiskaJr. EVALUATION AND SELECTION , 2020, Systems Engineering Principles and Practice.

[57]  Ting Wang,et al.  Quantification and integration of Kano’s model into QFD for optimising product design , 2014 .

[58]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Personnel Selection Using Interval 2‐Tuple Linguistic VIKOR Method , 2015 .

[59]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A new hesitant fuzzy QFD approach: An application to computer workstation selection , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[60]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[61]  Chih-Hsuan Wang,et al.  Using quality function deployment for collaborative product design and optimal selection of module mix , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[62]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making approaches based on distance measures for linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets , 2016, J. Oper. Res. Soc..