Candidate biomarkers discovered in the laboratory need to be rigorously validated before advancing to clinical application. However, it is often expensive and time-consuming to collect the high quality specimens needed for validation; moreover, such specimens are often limited in volume. The Early Detection Research Network has developed valuable specimen reference sets that can be used by multiple labs for biomarker validation. To optimize the chance of successful validation, it is critical to efficiently utilize the limited specimens in these reference sets on promising candidate biomarkers. Towards this end, we propose a novel two-stage validation strategy that partitions the samples in the reference set into two groups for sequential validation. The proposed strategy adopts the group sequential testing method to control for the type I error rate and rotates group membership to maximize the usage of available samples. We develop analytical formulas for performance parameters of this strategy in terms of the expected numbers of biomarkers that can be evaluated and the truly useful biomarkers that can be successfully validated, which can provide valuable guidance for future study design. The performance of our proposed strategy for validating biomarkers with respect to the points on the receiver operating characteristic curve are evaluated via extensive simulation studies and compared with the default strategy of validating each biomarker using all samples in the reference set. Different types of early stopping rules and boundary shapes in the group sequential testing method are considered. Compared with the default strategy, our proposed strategy makes more efficient use of the limited resources in the reference set by allowing more candidate biomarkers to be evaluated, giving a better chance of having truly useful biomarkers successfully validated.
[1]
Y. Benjamini,et al.
Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing
,
1995
.
[2]
P. O'Brien,et al.
A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials.
,
1979,
Biometrics.
[3]
Margaret Sullivan Pepe,et al.
Conditional estimation of sensitivity and specificity from a phase 2 biomarker study allowing early termination for futility
,
2009,
Statistics in medicine.
[4]
Sudhir Srivastava,et al.
The Early Detection Research Network's Specimen reference sets: paving the way for rapid evaluation of potential biomarkers.
,
2013,
Clinical chemistry.
[5]
Joseph S Koopmeiners,et al.
Asymptotic Properties of the Sequential Empirical ROC, PPV and NPV Curves Under Case-Control Sampling.
,
2011,
Annals of statistics.
[6]
M S Pepe,et al.
Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.
,
2001,
Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[7]
Sudhir Srivastava,et al.
Definitive Characterization of CA 19-9 in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Using a Reference Set of Serum and Plasma Specimens
,
2015,
PloS one.
[8]
S. Pocock.
Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials
,
1977
.
[9]
T R Fleming,et al.
Symmetric group sequential test designs.
,
1989,
Biometrics.
[10]
Margaret Sullivan Pepe,et al.
Conditional estimation after a two-stage diagnostic biomarker study that allows early termination for futility.
,
2012,
Statistics in medicine.