CONNECTIONS AND DISCONNECTIONS: A CONNECTIONIST ACCOUNT OF SURFACE DYSLEXIA

The acquired reading disorder of surface dyslexia, in which lower-frequency words with atypical spelling-sound correspondences (e.g., PINT) become highly vulnerable to error, is presented in a framework based on interaction between distributed representations in a triangle of orthographic, phonological, and semantic domains. The framework suggests that low-frequency exception words are rather inefficiently processed in terms of orthographic-phonological constraints, because these words are neither sufficiently common to have much impact on learning in the network nor sufficiently consistent with the pronunciations of their orthographic neighbors to benefit from shared structure. For these words, then, the interaction between phonological and semantic representations may be especially important for settling on the correct pronunciation. It is therefore viewed as no coincidental association that all reported patients with marked surface dyslexia have also been profoundly anomic, suggesting reduced semanticphonological activation. The chapter summarizes the simulation of surface dyslexia in the computational model of reading developed by Plaut, McClelland, Seidenberg, and Patterson (1996), and presents new data from three surface alexic patients. The graded consistency effects in the patients’ reading performance are more compatible with the distributed connectionist framework than with dual-route models maintaining a strict dichotomy between regular and exception words.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Connections and disconnections: Acquired dyslexia in a computational model of reading processes. , 1989 .

[2]  J. Marshall,et al.  Patterns of paralexia: a psycholinguistic approach. , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[3]  J. Hodges,et al.  Semantic dementia. Progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  E. Warrington,et al.  Semantic memory and reading abilities: A case report , 1995, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[5]  E. Funnell,et al.  Response Biases in Oral Reading: An Account of the Co occurrence of Surface Dyslexia and Semantic Dementia , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  E. Warrington,et al.  Phonological Reading: Phenomena and Paradoxes , 1986, Cortex.

[7]  J. Hodges,et al.  The relationship between comprehension and oral reading in progressive fluent aphasia , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Janice Kay,et al.  One Process, Not Two, in Reading Aloud: Lexical Analogies Do the Work of Non-Lexical Rules , 1981 .

[9]  Paul W. B. Atkins,et al.  Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .

[10]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[12]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Single and multiple component central dyslexic syndromes , 1995 .

[13]  S. Sasanuma,et al.  Progressive aphasia and surface Alexia in Japanese , 1995 .

[14]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic effects in single-word naming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. , 1994 .

[16]  E. Funnell Phonological processes in reading: new evidence from acquired dyslexia. , 1983, British journal of psychology.

[17]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. , 1987 .

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Hodges,et al.  Deterioration of word meaning: Implications for reading , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  D. Besner,et al.  Visual Word Recognition: Evidence for Strategic Control of Lexical and Nonlexical Routines in Oral Reading , 1991 .

[21]  John A. Bullinaria,et al.  Connectionist Models of Reading: Incorporating Semantics , 1996 .

[22]  M Coltheart,et al.  Bilingual Biscriptal Deep Dyslexia , 1984, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  Alan H. Kawamoto,et al.  Pronunciation of homographs , 1992 .

[24]  S. Black,et al.  Semantic encoding of pictures and words: Some neuropsychological observations , 1988 .

[25]  K. Paap,et al.  Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race , 1991 .

[26]  M Behrmann,et al.  Frequency and consistency effects in a pure surface dyslexic patient. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  A. Ellis,et al.  Semantic loss without surface dyslexia , 1995 .

[28]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[29]  T. Shallice,et al.  Reading without Semantics , 1983 .

[30]  H. Coslett,et al.  Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia , 1994 .

[31]  Ken N. Seergobin,et al.  On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? , 1990 .

[32]  S. Breedin Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia , 1994 .

[33]  J. Hodges,et al.  Charting the progression in semantic dementia: implications for the organisation of semantic memory. , 1995, Memory.

[34]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Surface dyslexia and dysgraphia: dual routes, single lexicon , 1992 .

[35]  L. Henderson Orthography and Word Recognition in Reading , 1982 .

[36]  R. Glushko The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .

[37]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Mechanisms for accessing lexical representations for output: Evidence from a category-specific semantic deficit , 1991, Brain and Language.

[39]  E. Funnell Phonological processes in reading: new evidence from acquired dyslexia. , 1983 .

[40]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Surface dyslexia. , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[41]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition , 1984 .

[42]  D. Howard,et al.  Abstract word anomia , 1995 .

[43]  Progressive aphasia without dementia due to focal left temporo-frontal hypometabolism - a clinical and cognitive neuropsychological analysis , 1995 .

[44]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Parallel Networks that Learn to Pronounce English Text , 1987, Complex Syst..

[45]  J. Hodges,et al.  Progressive pure anomia: Insufficient activation of phonology by meaning , 1995 .

[46]  J R Hodges,et al.  Nonfluent progressive aphasia and semantic dementia: A comparative neuropsychological study , 1996, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[47]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Varieties of developmental dyslexia , 1993, Cognition.