Infants’ Motor Proficiency and Statistical Learning for Actions

Prior research has shown that infants learn statistical regularities in action sequences better than they learn non-action event sequences. This is consistent with current theories claiming that the same mechanism guides action observation and action execution. The current eye-tracking study tested the prediction, based on these theories, that infants’ ability to learn statistical regularities in action sequences is modulated by their own motor abilities. Eight- to eleven-month-old infants observed an action sequence containing two deterministic action pairs (i.e., action A always followed by action B) embedded within an otherwise random sequence. One pair was performed with a whole-hand grasp. The second pair was performed with a pincer grasp, a fine motor skill that emerges around 9 months of age. Infants were then categorized into groups according to which grasp was dominant in their motor repertoire. Predictive looks to correct upcoming actions during the deterministic pairs were analyzed to measure whether infants learned and anticipated the sequence regularities. Findings indicate that infants learned the statistical regularities: across motor groups, they made more correct than incorrect predictive fixations to upcoming actions. Overall, learning was not significantly modulated by their dominant grasping abilities. However, infants with a dominant pincer grasp showed an earlier increase in correct predictions for the pincer grasp pair and not the whole-hand grasp. Likewise, infants with a dominant whole-hand grasp showed an early increase in correct predictions for the pair performed with a whole-hand grasp, and not the pincer grasp. Together, these findings suggest that infants’ ability to learn action sequences is facilitated when the observed action matches their own action repertoire. However, findings cannot be explained entirely by motor accounts, as infants also learned the actions less congruent with their own abilities. Findings are discussed in terms of the interplay between the motor system and additional non-motor resources during the acquisition of new motor skills in infancy.

[1]  Angelika Lingnau,et al.  Action understanding within and outside the motor system: the role of task difficulty. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.

[3]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Monitoring others' errors: The role of the motor system in early childhood and adulthood. , 2016, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[4]  B. Hommel,et al.  Where Do Action Goals Come from? Evidence for Spontaneous Action–Effect Binding in Infants , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[5]  N. Bolognini,et al.  Infants' Visual Recognition of Pincer Grip Emerges Between 9 and 12 Months of Age. , 2017, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[6]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience How Learning to Shake a Rattle Affects 8-month-old Infants' Perception of the Rattle's Sound: Electrophysiological Evidence for Action-effect Binding in Infancy , 2022 .

[7]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Development of object concepts in infancy: Evidence for early learning in an eye-tracking paradigm , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R. Johansson,et al.  Action plans used in action observation , 2003, Nature.

[9]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Infants' statistical learning: 2- and 5-month-olds' segmentation of continuous visual sequences. , 2015, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[10]  Chen Yu,et al.  What you learn is what you see: using eye movements to study infant cross-situational word learning. , 2011, Developmental science.

[11]  A. Woodward,et al.  Action production influences 12-month-old infants' attention to others' actions. , 2012, Developmental science.

[12]  Sabine Hunnius,et al.  Sensitivity to structure in action sequences: An infant event-related potential study , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  The motor cortex is causally related to predictive eye movements during action observation , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Z. Dienes,et al.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants and neural networks , 1999 .

[15]  P. Albert,et al.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[16]  Derek M. Houston,et al.  Visual Sequence Learning in Infancy: Domain-General and Domain-Specific Associations with Language. , 2012, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[17]  Yasuhiro Kanakogi,et al.  Developmental correspondence between action prediction and motor ability in early infancy. , 2011, Nature communications.

[18]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  What are you doing? How active and observational experience shape infants' action understanding , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  C. Hofsten,et al.  Predictive gaze shifts elicited during observed and performed actions in 10-month-old infants and adults , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Michiel M. A. Spapé,et al.  From outcome prediction to action selection: developmental change in the role of action-effect bindings. , 2013, Developmental science.

[21]  C. Hofsten,et al.  Infants predict other people's action goals , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Development of object concepts in infancy , 2010 .

[23]  Jodie A. Baird,et al.  Discerning intentions in dynamic human action , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  R. Schubotz.  Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  N. Kirkham,et al.  Learning to look: probabilistic variation and noise guide infants' eye movements. , 2013, Developmental science.

[27]  M. Costantini,et al.  Looking Ahead: Anticipatory Gaze and Motor Ability in Infancy , 2013, PloS one.

[28]  Hein T. van Schie,et al.  You'll never crawl alone: Neurophysiological evidence for experience-dependent motor resonance in infancy , 2008, NeuroImage.

[29]  J. Sommerville,et al.  Action experience alters 3-month-old infants' perception of others' actions , 2005, Cognition.

[30]  Alexa R. Romberg,et al.  Infants segment continuous events using transitional probabilities. , 2014, Child development.

[31]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  The role of frequency information and teleological reasoning in infants' and adults' action prediction. , 2011, Developmental psychology.

[32]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Using movement and intentions to understand simple events , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[33]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[34]  Ricarda I. Schubotz,et al.  Dissociating dynamic probability and predictability in observed actions—an fMRI study , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  R. Aslin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article UNSUPERVISED STATISTICAL LEARNING OF HIGHER-ORDER SPATIAL STRUCTURES FROM VISUAL SCENES , 2022 .

[36]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[37]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Statistical language learning in neonates revealed by event-related brain potentials , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[38]  Olga Kochukhova,et al.  Goal anticipation during action observation is influenced by synonymous action capabilities, a puzzling developmental study , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Motor System Activation Reveals Infants’ On-Line Prediction of Others’ Goals , 2010, Psychological science.

[40]  Janny C. Stapel,et al.  Motor system contribution to action prediction: Temporal accuracy depends on motor experience , 2016, Cognition.

[41]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics , 2008, Cognition.

[42]  Steven P. Wise,et al.  Motor Cortex , 2013 .

[43]  A. Woodward,et al.  The joint role of trained, untrained, and observed actions at the origins of goal recognition. , 2014, Infant behavior & development.

[44]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Linking Actions and Their Perceivable Consequences in the Human Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[45]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[46]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[47]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Short-term Motor Training, but Not Observational Training, Alters Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Action Processing in Infancy , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Claire D. Monroy,et al.  Toddlers' action prediction: Statistical learning of continuous action sequences. , 2017, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[49]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  The early development of object knowledge: a study of infants' visual anticipations during action observation. , 2010, Developmental psychology.