Hidden Markov model analysis reveals the advantage of analytic eye movement patterns in face recognition across cultures

It remains controversial whether culture modulates eye movement behavior in face recognition. Inconsistent results have been reported regarding whether cultural differences in eye movement patterns exist, whether these differences affect recognition performance, and whether participants use similar eye movement patterns when viewing faces from different ethnicities. These inconsistencies may be due to substantial individual differences in eye movement patterns within a cultural group. Here we addressed this issue by conducting individual-level eye movement data analysis using hidden Markov models (HMMs). Each individual's eye movements were modeled with an HMM. We clustered the individual HMMs according to their similarities and discovered three common patterns in both Asian and Caucasian participants: holistic (looking mostly at the face center), left-eye-biased analytic (looking mostly at the two individual eyes in addition to the face center with a slight bias to the left eye), and right-eye-based analytic (looking mostly at the right eye in addition to the face center). The frequency of participants adopting the three patterns did not differ significantly between Asians and Caucasians, suggesting little modulation from culture. Significantly more participants (75%) showed similar eye movement patterns when viewing own- and other-race faces than different patterns. Most importantly, participants with left-eye-biased analytic patterns performed significantly better than those using either holistic or right-eye-biased analytic patterns. These results suggest that active retrieval of facial feature information through an analytic eye movement pattern may be optimal for face recognition regardless of culture.

[1]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  Tim Chuk,et al.  Hidden Markov model analysis reveals better eye movement strategies in face recognition , 2015, CogSci.

[3]  S M Luria,et al.  Comparison of Eye Movements over Faces in Photographic Positives and Negatives , 1978, Perception.

[4]  Jason J S Barton,et al.  Information Processing during Face Recognition: The Effects of Familiarity, Inversion, and Morphing on Scanning Fixations , 2006, Perception.

[5]  Junpeng Lao,et al.  iMap4: An open source toolbox for the statistical fixation mapping of eye movement data with linear mixed modeling , 2017, Behavior research methods.

[6]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Component-Based Representation in Automated Face Recognition , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[7]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  Arguments Against a Configural Processing Account of Familiar Face Recognition , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[8]  Inverting Faces Does Not Abolish Cultural Diversity in Eye Movements , 2010 .

[9]  P. Quinn,et al.  Adults Scan Own- and Other-Race Faces Differently , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  V. Bruce,et al.  Local and Relational Aspects of Face Distinctiveness , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[11]  Matthew F. Peterson,et al.  Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study , 2004, Cognition.

[13]  A. L. Yarbus Eye Movements During Perception of Complex Objects , 1967 .

[14]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[15]  Janet H. Hsiao,et al.  The optimal viewing position in face recognition. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[16]  David P. Crabb,et al.  Are Certain Eye Movement Patterns Linked To Better Face Recognition Performance In Patients With Central Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss , 2012 .

[17]  Sam S. Rakover,et al.  Facial inversion effects: Parts and whole relationship , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  C. McManus,et al.  Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.

[19]  Karen Gasper,et al.  Attending to the Big Picture: Mood and Global Versus Local Processing of Visual Information , 2002, Psychological science.

[20]  T. F. Gross Own-Ethnicity Bias in the Recognition of Black, East Asian, Hispanic, and White Faces , 2009 .

[21]  G. Rhodes,et al.  An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition , 2008, Cognition.

[22]  Tim Chuk,et al.  Global and Local Priming Evoke Different Face Processing Strategies: Evidence From An Eye Movement Study. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[23]  J. Keenan,et al.  Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[24]  Tim Chuk,et al.  Is having similar eye movement patterns during face learning and recognition beneficial for recognition performance? Evidence from hidden Markov modeling , 2017, Vision Research.

[25]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Cross-Racial Facial Identification: A Social Cognitive Integration , 1992 .

[26]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[27]  A. Gale,et al.  Eye Movement Strategies Involved in Face Perception , 1977, Perception.

[28]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and the Physical Environment , 2006, Psychological science.

[29]  N. Brady,et al.  Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[30]  Antoni B. Chan,et al.  Clustering hidden Markov models with variational HEM , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[31]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  The generation of secondary saccades without postsaccadic visual feedback. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[32]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  Eye movements are functional during face learning , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[33]  N. Scott-Samuel,et al.  Idiosyncratic initiation of saccadic face exploration in humans , 2005, Vision Research.

[34]  Michael J. Bernstein,et al.  Perception and Motivation in Face Recognition , 2012, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[35]  R. Caldara,et al.  Culture Shapes Eye Movements for Visually Homogeneous Objects , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[36]  P. Schyns,et al.  Local Jekyll and Global Hyde : The Dual Identity of Face Identification , 2011 .

[37]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Faces in the eye of the beholder: unique and stable eye scanning patterns of individual observers. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[38]  Matthew F. Peterson,et al.  Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[39]  Chi Fang,et al.  Computers do better than experts matching faces in a large population , 2010, 9th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI'10).

[40]  Megan H. Papesh,et al.  Deficits in cross-race face learning: insights from eye movements and pupillometry. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  M. Bindemann,et al.  Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[42]  Nicola C. Anderson,et al.  Curious eyes: Individual differences in personality predict eye movement behavior in scene-viewing , 2012, Cognition.

[43]  J. Macke,et al.  Quantifying the effect of intertrial dependence on perceptual decisions. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[44]  B. Rossion,et al.  Impairment of holistic face perception following right occipito-temporal damage in prosopagnosia: Converging evidence from gaze-contingency , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  Tim Chuk,et al.  Understanding eye movements in face recognition using hidden Markov models. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[46]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Features are Also Important: Contributions of Featural and Configural Processing to Face Recognition , 2000, Psychological science.

[47]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  Eye movements during information processing tasks: Individual differences and cultural effects , 2007, Vision Research.

[48]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks , 2001, Vision Research.

[49]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  F. Mast,et al.  How Mood States Affect Information Processing During Facial Emotion Recognition: An Eye Tracking Study , 2011 .

[51]  K. Verfaillie,et al.  Face inversion impairs holistic perception: evidence from gaze-contingent stimulation. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[52]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Humans have idiosyncratic and task-specific scanpaths for judging faces , 2015, Vision Research.

[54]  P Bakan,et al.  Visual asymmetry in perception of faces. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  R. Caldara,et al.  Developing cultural differences in face processing. , 2011, Developmental science.

[56]  Rachael E. Jack,et al.  Social Experience Does Not Abolish Cultural Diversity in Eye Movements , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[57]  Antoni B. Chan,et al.  Eye Movement Pattern in Face Recognition is Associated with Cognitive Decline in the Elderly , 2015, CogSci.

[58]  Rachael E. Jack,et al.  Culture Shapes How We Look at Faces , 2008, PloS one.

[59]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[60]  Matthew F. Peterson,et al.  Individual Differences in Eye Movements During Face Identification Reflect Observer-Specific Optimal Points of Fixation , 2013, Psychological science.

[61]  R. Caldara,et al.  Putting Culture Under the ‘Spotlight’ Reveals Universal Information Use for Face Recognition , 2010, PloS one.

[62]  A. Mike Burton,et al.  Tolerance for distorted faces: Challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition , 2014, Cognition.

[63]  G. Cottrell,et al.  Two Fixations Suffice in Face Recognition , 2008, Psychological science.

[64]  Takahiro Sekiguchi,et al.  Individual differences in face memory and eye fixation patterns during face learning. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[65]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Contact, configural coding and the other-race effect in face recognition. , 2008, British journal of psychology.

[66]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and processing of component and spatial–relational information in faces. , 1996 .