Hidden Markov model analysis reveals the advantage of analytic eye movement patterns in face recognition across cultures
暂无分享,去创建一个
Tim Chuk | William G. Hayward | Antoni B. Chan | Janet H. Hsiao | Kate Crookes | W. Hayward | Kate Crookes | J. Hsiao | Tim Chuk
[1] S. Shimojo,et al. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.
[2] Tim Chuk,et al. Hidden Markov model analysis reveals better eye movement strategies in face recognition , 2015, CogSci.
[3] S M Luria,et al. Comparison of Eye Movements over Faces in Photographic Positives and Negatives , 1978, Perception.
[4] Jason J S Barton,et al. Information Processing during Face Recognition: The Effects of Familiarity, Inversion, and Morphing on Scanning Fixations , 2006, Perception.
[5] Junpeng Lao,et al. iMap4: An open source toolbox for the statistical fixation mapping of eye movement data with linear mixed modeling , 2017, Behavior research methods.
[6] Anil K. Jain,et al. Component-Based Representation in Automated Face Recognition , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.
[7] Rob Jenkins,et al. Arguments Against a Configural Processing Account of Familiar Face Recognition , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[8] Inverting Faces Does Not Abolish Cultural Diversity in Eye Movements , 2010 .
[9] P. Quinn,et al. Adults Scan Own- and Other-Race Faces Differently , 2012, PloS one.
[10] V. Bruce,et al. Local and Relational Aspects of Face Distinctiveness , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[11] Matthew F. Peterson,et al. Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[12] Markus Kiefer,et al. A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study , 2004, Cognition.
[13] A. L. Yarbus. Eye Movements During Perception of Complex Objects , 1967 .
[14] J. Brigham,et al. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .
[15] Janet H. Hsiao,et al. The optimal viewing position in face recognition. , 2012, Journal of vision.
[16] David P. Crabb,et al. Are Certain Eye Movement Patterns Linked To Better Face Recognition Performance In Patients With Central Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss , 2012 .
[17] Sam S. Rakover,et al. Facial inversion effects: Parts and whole relationship , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.
[18] C. McManus,et al. Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.
[19] Karen Gasper,et al. Attending to the Big Picture: Mood and Global Versus Local Processing of Visual Information , 2002, Psychological science.
[20] T. F. Gross. Own-Ethnicity Bias in the Recognition of Black, East Asian, Hispanic, and White Faces , 2009 .
[21] G. Rhodes,et al. An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition , 2008, Cognition.
[22] Tim Chuk,et al. Global and Local Priming Evoke Different Face Processing Strategies: Evidence From An Eye Movement Study. , 2015, Journal of vision.
[23] J. Keenan,et al. Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration. , 2001, British journal of psychology.
[24] Tim Chuk,et al. Is having similar eye movement patterns during face learning and recognition beneficial for recognition performance? Evidence from hidden Markov modeling , 2017, Vision Research.
[25] Brian Mullen,et al. Cross-Racial Facial Identification: A Social Cognitive Integration , 1992 .
[26] R. Nisbett,et al. Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. , 2001, Psychological review.
[27] A. Gale,et al. Eye Movement Strategies Involved in Face Perception , 1977, Perception.
[28] R. Nisbett,et al. Culture and the Physical Environment , 2006, Psychological science.
[29] N. Brady,et al. Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend , 2005, Brain and Cognition.
[30] Antoni B. Chan,et al. Clustering hidden Markov models with variational HEM , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[31] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. The generation of secondary saccades without postsaccadic visual feedback. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[32] Carrick C. Williams,et al. Eye movements are functional during face learning , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[33] N. Scott-Samuel,et al. Idiosyncratic initiation of saccadic face exploration in humans , 2005, Vision Research.
[34] Michael J. Bernstein,et al. Perception and Motivation in Face Recognition , 2012, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[35] R. Caldara,et al. Culture Shapes Eye Movements for Visually Homogeneous Objects , 2010, Front. Psychology.
[36] P. Schyns,et al. Local Jekyll and Global Hyde : The Dual Identity of Face Identification , 2011 .
[37] Galit Yovel,et al. Faces in the eye of the beholder: unique and stable eye scanning patterns of individual observers. , 2014, Journal of vision.
[38] Matthew F. Peterson,et al. Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures. , 2015, Journal of vision.
[39] Chi Fang,et al. Computers do better than experts matching faces in a large population , 2010, 9th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI'10).
[40] Megan H. Papesh,et al. Deficits in cross-race face learning: insights from eye movements and pupillometry. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[41] M. Bindemann,et al. Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[42] Nicola C. Anderson,et al. Curious eyes: Individual differences in personality predict eye movement behavior in scene-viewing , 2012, Cognition.
[43] J. Macke,et al. Quantifying the effect of intertrial dependence on perceptual decisions. , 2014, Journal of vision.
[44] B. Rossion,et al. Impairment of holistic face perception following right occipito-temporal damage in prosopagnosia: Converging evidence from gaze-contingency , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[45] Tim Chuk,et al. Understanding eye movements in face recognition using hidden Markov models. , 2014, Journal of vision.
[46] Roberto Cabeza,et al. Features are Also Important: Contributions of Featural and Configural Processing to Face Recognition , 2000, Psychological science.
[47] Carrick C. Williams,et al. Eye movements during information processing tasks: Individual differences and cultural effects , 2007, Vision Research.
[48] Frédéric Gosselin,et al. Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks , 2001, Vision Research.
[49] J. Bartlett,et al. Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.
[50] F. Mast,et al. How Mood States Affect Information Processing During Facial Emotion Recognition: An Eye Tracking Study , 2011 .
[51] K. Verfaillie,et al. Face inversion impairs holistic perception: evidence from gaze-contingent stimulation. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[52] Julie E. Boland,et al. Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[53] Garrison W. Cottrell,et al. Humans have idiosyncratic and task-specific scanpaths for judging faces , 2015, Vision Research.
[54] P Bakan,et al. Visual asymmetry in perception of faces. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.
[55] R. Caldara,et al. Developing cultural differences in face processing. , 2011, Developmental science.
[56] Rachael E. Jack,et al. Social Experience Does Not Abolish Cultural Diversity in Eye Movements , 2011, Front. Psychology.
[57] Antoni B. Chan,et al. Eye Movement Pattern in Face Recognition is Associated with Cognitive Decline in the Elderly , 2015, CogSci.
[58] Rachael E. Jack,et al. Culture Shapes How We Look at Faces , 2008, PloS one.
[59] A. Freire,et al. The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.
[60] Matthew F. Peterson,et al. Individual Differences in Eye Movements During Face Identification Reflect Observer-Specific Optimal Points of Fixation , 2013, Psychological science.
[61] R. Caldara,et al. Putting Culture Under the ‘Spotlight’ Reveals Universal Information Use for Face Recognition , 2010, PloS one.
[62] A. Mike Burton,et al. Tolerance for distorted faces: Challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition , 2014, Cognition.
[63] G. Cottrell,et al. Two Fixations Suffice in Face Recognition , 2008, Psychological science.
[64] Takahiro Sekiguchi,et al. Individual differences in face memory and eye fixation patterns during face learning. , 2011, Acta psychologica.
[65] Gillian Rhodes,et al. Contact, configural coding and the other-race effect in face recognition. , 2008, British journal of psychology.
[66] J. Bartlett,et al. Inversion and processing of component and spatial–relational information in faces. , 1996 .