Modelling the Firm in its Market and Organizational Environment: Methodologies for Studying Corporate Social Responsibility

The study of corporate social responsibility (CSR) can best be mainstreamed within the wider social science literature if it is defined as firms voluntarily assuming responsibility for their externalities, thereby setting the puzzle of how this can be reconciled with the maximization of shareholder value as the central challenge of the subject. Means of resolving the puzzle require modelling the firm interacting with its environment as both a market actor and as an organization, and in particular through the interaction between these two. Such an approach has no need of a separate concept of ‘stakeholders’. The analysis develops through the firm's relations with actual and potential political action (raising the separate issue of corporate citizenship), and the tastes of consumers, investors and employees—the last raising interesting implications for principal–agent theory.

[1]  A. Crane,et al.  Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization , 2005 .

[2]  Karen E. Schnietz,et al.  Exploring the Financial Value of a Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility During a Crisis , 2005 .

[3]  M. Friedman.  The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits , 2007 .

[4]  M. Meijer,et al.  Corporate Social Performance as a Bottom Line for Consumers , 2005 .

[5]  Miguel A. Rodríguez,et al.  Sustainability in the Boardroom: An Empirical Examination of Dow Jones Sustainability World Index Leaders , 2005 .

[6]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image , 1996 .

[7]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[8]  U.S. Consumer Sensitivity to Corporate Social Performance , 1997 .

[9]  J. van Oosterhout.  Corporate Citizenship: An Idea Whose Time Has Not Yet Come , 2005 .

[10]  W. Visser.  Corporate Citizenship in South Africa , 2005 .

[11]  Thomas J. Zenisek.  Corporate Social Responsibility: A Conceptualization Based On Organizational Literature , 1979 .

[12]  T. L. Schwartz.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1986 .

[13]  C. Crouch.  Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs , 2005 .

[14]  J. Moon,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility , 2004 .

[15]  Margaret Levi,et al.  A state of trust , 1996 .

[16]  Alan Cawson,et al.  Corporatism and political theory , 1986 .

[17]  J. Moon,et al.  Can Corporations be Citizens? Corporate Citizenship as a Metaphor for Business Participation in Society , 2005, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[18]  Constructing an Ethic for Business Practice , 1998 .

[19]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  THE CASE FOR CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY , 1983 .

[20]  Wolfgang Streeck,et al.  Governing Capitalist Economies: Performance and Control of Economic Sectors. , 1995 .

[21]  R. Hamann,et al.  Universalizing Corporate Social Responsibility? South African Challenges to the International Organization for Standardization's New Social Responsibility Standard , 2005 .

[22]  C. Lin,et al.  Can Nonprofit Hospitals Do Both Well and Good? , 2005, Health care management review.

[23]  R. Falkner.  Private Environmental Governance and International Relations: Exploring the Links , 2003, Global Environmental Politics.

[24]  C. Crouch.  Industrial Relations And European State Traditions , 1994 .

[25]  Linda S. Munilla,et al.  The corporate social responsibility continuum as a component of stakeholder theory , 2005 .

[26]  A. Warhurst.  Future roles of business in society: the expanding boundaries of corporate responsibility and a compelling case for partnership , 2005 .

[27]  Marek Korczynski,et al.  The Political Economy of Trust , 2002 .

[28]  M. C. Jensen.  Value Maximisation, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function , 2001 .

[29]  K. Leisinger.  The corporate social responsibility of the pharmaceutical industry: idealism without illusion and realism without resignation. , 2005, Business ethics quarterly : the journal of the Society for Business Ethics.

[30]  R. Klonoski.  Foundational considerations in the corporate social responsibility debate , 1991 .

[31]  S. Waddock.  Parallel Universes: Companies, Academics, and the Progress of Corporate Citizenship , 2004 .

[32]  Carmen Valor,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability , 2005 .

[33]  R. Hamann,et al.  Local Governance as a Complex System , 2005 .

[34]  Timothy Smith.  Institutional and Social Investors Find Common Ground , 2005 .

[35]  A. Crane,et al.  Corporate Citizenship: Missing The Point Or Missing The Boat? A Reply To Van Oosterhout , 2005 .

[36]  J. Ruggie.  Reconstituting the Global Public Domain — Issues, Actors, and Practices , 2004 .

[37]  Simon Zadek,et al.  The Logic of Collaborative Governance Corporate Responsibility, Accountability, and the Social Contract , 2006 .

[38]  P. Thompson,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in Malaysia , 2004 .

[39]  A. Fourie,et al.  The Case for Collective Business Action to Achieve Systems Change , 2005 .

[40]  Lyman E. Ostlund.  Attitudes of Managers toward Corporate Social Responsibility , 1977 .

[41]  S. Ghoshal.  Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices , 2005 .

[42]  C. Middleton.  Turning Point: Interview with Michael Spicer, Chief Executive, South Africa Foundation , 2005 .

[43]  D. Julius.  Globalization and stakeholder conflicts: a corporate perspective , 1997 .

[44]  M. Kenney.  Understanding silicon valley : the anatomy of an entrepreneurial region , 2000 .

[45]  J. Hollingsworth,et al.  Advancing socio-economics : an institutionalist perspective , 2002 .

[46]  W. Chapple,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia , 2005 .

[47]  Niklas Egels.  CSR in Electrification of Rural Africa , 2005 .

[48]  A. Elkins.  Toward A Positive Theory of Corporate Social Involvement , 1977 .

[49]  Dean Kruckeberg,et al.  Ethical obligations of public relations in an era of globalisation , 2004 .