Robust diagnosis of discrete-event systems subject to permanent sensor failures

Abstract One approach to online fault diagnosis of discrete-event systems is through the use of the diagnosers . Diagnosers are deterministic automata whose states are sets formed with the states of the plant together with labels that indicate if the trace that has occurred so far possesses or not the fault event. The decision regarding fault occurrence is taken based solely on observable events, i.e. , events whose occurrences can be recorded by sensors. However, if one or more sensors that provide information on event occurrences fail, the diagnoser may either come to a halt or may even provide wrong information regarding fault occurrence. In order to overcome this deficiency, this paper proposes a robust diagnoser that deploys the redundancy that may exist in a set formed of diagnosis bases (set of events that guarantee fault diagnosability) with a view to ensure the fault diagnosis even in the occurrence of permanent sensor failures.

[1]  Stavros Tripakis,et al.  Fault Diagnosis for Timed Automata , 2002, FTRTFT.

[2]  Stéphane Lafortune,et al.  Diagnosis of Discrete Event Systems Using Decentralized Architectures , 2007, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[3]  W. Qiu,et al.  Decentralized failure diagnosis of discrete event systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[4]  J.H. van Schuppen,et al.  Decentralized failure diagnosis for discrete-event systems with costly communication between diagnosers , 2002, Sixth International Workshop on Discrete Event Systems, 2002. Proceedings..

[5]  Stéphane Lafortune,et al.  Diagnosability of Discrete Event Systems with Modular Structure , 2006, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[6]  Shigemasa Takai,et al.  Inference-based ambiguity management in decentralized decision-making: decentralized diagnosis of discrete event systems , 2006 .

[7]  Raja Sengupta,et al.  Diagnosability of discrete-event systems , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[8]  W. M. Wonham,et al.  The control of discrete event systems , 1989 .

[9]  Antonia M. Sánchez,et al.  Safe Supervisory Control Under Observability Failure , 2006, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[10]  Eleftheria Athanasopoulou,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Failure Diagnosis in Finite State Machines Under Unreliable Observations , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[11]  Stephane Lafortune,et al.  Robust codiagnosability of discrete event systems , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[12]  Demosthenis Teneketzis,et al.  Diagnosability of stochastic discrete-event systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  Stéphane Lafortune,et al.  Coordinated decentralized protocols for failure diagnosis of discrete event systems , 1998, Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.98CH36171).

[14]  Christos G. Cassandras,et al.  Introduction to Discrete Event Systems , 1999, The Kluwer International Series on Discrete Event Dynamic Systems.

[15]  K.R. Rohloff Sensor Failure Tolerant Supervisory Control , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[16]  Shahin Hashtrudi-Zad,et al.  Fault diagnosis in discrete-event systems: framework and model reduction , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..