Efficient Homology-directed Repair with Circular ssDNA Donors

While genome editing has been revolutionized by the advent of CRISPR-based nucleases, difficulties in achieving efficient, nuclease-mediated, homology-directed repair (HDR) still limit many applications. Commonly used DNA donors such as plasmids suffer from low HDR efficiencies in many cell types, as well as integration at unintended sites. In contrast, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) donors can produce efficient HDR with minimal off-target integration. Here, we describe the use of ssDNA phage to efficiently and inexpensively produce long circular ssDNA (cssDNA) donors. These cssDNA donors serve as efficient HDR templates when used with Cas9 or Cas12a, with integration frequencies superior to linear ssDNA (lssDNA) donors. To evaluate the relative efficiencies of imprecise and precise repair for a suite of different Cas9 or Cas12a nucleases, we have developed a modified Traffic Light Reporter (TLR) system [TLR-Multi-Cas Variant 1 (MCV1)] that permits side-by-side comparisons of different nuclease systems. We used this system to assess editing and HDR efficiencies of different nuclease platforms with distinct DNA donor types. We then extended the analysis of DNA donor types to evaluate efficiencies of fluorescent tag knock-ins at endogenous sites in HEK293T and K562 cells. Our results show that cssDNA templates produce efficient and robust insertion of reporter tags. Targeting efficiency is high, allowing production of biallelic integrants using cssDNA donors. cssDNA donors also outcompete lssDNA donors in template-driven repair at the target site. These data demonstrate that circular donors provide an efficient, cost-effective method to achieve knock-ins in mammalian cell lines.

[1]  David J. Rawlings,et al.  Tracking genome engineering outcome at individual DNA breakpoints , 2011, Nature Methods.

[2]  Daesik Kim,et al.  Evaluating and Enhancing Target Specificity of Gene-Editing Nucleases and Deaminases. , 2019, Annual review of biochemistry.

[3]  R. Brent,et al.  Introduction to Vectors Derived from Filamentous Phages , 1991, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[4]  George Church,et al.  Optimization of scarless human stem cell genome editing , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  Przemek M Krawczyk,et al.  Nick-initiated homologous recombination: Protecting the genome, one strand at a time. , 2017, DNA repair.

[6]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[7]  Lu-Zhe Sun,et al.  Rapid isolation of highly pure single-stranded DNA from phagemids. , 2009, Analytical biochemistry.

[8]  Namritha Ravinder,et al.  Enhanced CRISPR/Cas9-mediated precise genome editing by improved design and delivery of gRNA, Cas9 nuclease, and donor DNA. , 2017, Journal of biotechnology.

[9]  Jacob E Corn,et al.  Enhancing homology-directed genome editing by catalytically active and inactive CRISPR-Cas9 using asymmetric donor DNA , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Eunji Kim,et al.  In vivo genome editing with a small Cas9 orthologue derived from Campylobacter jejuni , 2017, Nature Communications.

[11]  Mitchel J Doktycz,et al.  Thrombin-mediated transcriptional regulation using DNA aptamers in DNA-based cell-free protein synthesis. , 2014, ACS synthetic biology.

[12]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Phylogeny of Cas9 determines functional exchangeability of dual-RNA and Cas9 among orthologous type II CRISPR-Cas systems , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  C R Merril,et al.  Affinity generation of single-stranded DNA for dideoxy sequencing following the polymerase chain reaction. , 1989, Analytical biochemistry.

[14]  Andreas Reinisch,et al.  Multiplexed genetic engineering of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using CRISPR/Cas9 and AAV6 , 2017, eLife.

[15]  Hao Yin,et al.  Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  He Huang,et al.  Integration-defective lentiviral vector mediates efficient gene editing through homology-directed repair in human embryonic stem cells , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  E. M. DeGennaro,et al.  Multiplex gene editing by CRISPR-Cpf1 through autonomous processing of a single crRNA array , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Lihua Julie Zhu,et al.  Enhanced Cas12a editing in mammalian cells and zebrafish , 2019, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  Aki Hayashi,et al.  Short-Homology-Mediated CRISPR/Cas9-Based Method for Genome Editing in Fission Yeast , 2019, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[20]  Hao Yan,et al.  In vivo cloning of artificial DNA nanostructures , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  J. Doudna,et al.  Expanding the Biologist's Toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[22]  Masahiro Sato,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9-based generation of knockdown mice by intronic insertion of artificial microRNA using longer single-stranded DNA , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Dipali G. Sashital,et al.  The Revolution Continues: Newly Discovered Systems Expand the CRISPR-Cas Toolkit. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[24]  A. Lever,et al.  Pausing of reverse transcriptase on retroviral RNA templates is influenced by secondary structures both 5' and 3' of the catalytic site. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  Steven Lin,et al.  Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery , 2014, eLife.

[26]  Sruthi Mantri,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 β-globin gene targeting in human haematopoietic stem cells , 2016, Nature.

[27]  Hui Zhao,et al.  Knock-in of large reporter genes in human cells via CRISPR/Cas9-induced homology-dependent and independent DNA repair , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  Russell V. Lenth,et al.  Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans , 2016 .

[29]  Jeffry D. Sander,et al.  CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  Deepti Deshpande,et al.  Reprogramming Human T Cell Function and Specificity With Non–Viral Genome Targeting , 2019, Pediatrics.

[31]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Selection-free genome editing of the sickle mutation in human adult hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[32]  M. Uhlén,et al.  Magnetic separation of DNA , 1989, Nature.

[33]  Luca Pinello,et al.  Editing aberrant splice sites efficiently restores β-globin expression in β-thalassemia. , 2019, Blood.

[34]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[35]  Lucas B. Harrington,et al.  A thermostable Cas9 with increased lifetime in human plasma , 2017, bioRxiv.

[36]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Targeted gene knock-in by homology-directed genome editing using Cas9 ribonucleoprotein and AAV donor delivery , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  T. Mashimo,et al.  ssODN-mediated knock-in with CRISPR-Cas for large genomic regions in zygotes , 2016, Nature Communications.

[38]  Israel Steinfeld,et al.  Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[39]  Bo Huang,et al.  A scalable strategy for high-throughput GFP tagging of endogenous human proteins , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Erik J Sontheimer,et al.  A Compact, High-Accuracy Cas9 with a Dinucleotide PAM for In Vivo Genome Editing. , 2019, Molecular cell.

[41]  V. Petrenko,et al.  Phagemid vectors for phage display: properties, characteristics and construction. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  Kai Rothkamm,et al.  Pathways of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair during the Mammalian Cell Cycle , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[43]  Chunyan Ren,et al.  Highly efficient therapeutic gene editing of human hematopoietic stem cells , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[44]  Eric A. Hendrickson,et al.  Mechanisms of precise genome editing using oligonucleotide donors. , 2017, Genome research.

[45]  Lei S. Qi,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 in Genome Editing and Beyond. , 2016, Annual review of biochemistry.

[46]  Yutaka Inagaki,et al.  Easi-CRISPR: a robust method for one-step generation of mice carrying conditional and insertion alleles using long ssDNA donors and CRISPR ribonucleoproteins , 2017, Genome Biology.

[47]  T. Kunkel.  Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Nicholas E. Propson,et al.  Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  David A. Scott,et al.  In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 , 2015, Nature.

[50]  A. Regev,et al.  Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System , 2015, Cell.

[51]  Joy Arakaki,et al.  Systematic gene tagging using CRISPR/Cas9 in human stem cells to illuminate cell organization , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.

[52]  Bam Hi,et al.  Introduction to Vectors Derived from Filamentous Phages , 2000 .

[53]  Oliver D. King,et al.  Precise therapeutic gene correction by a simple nuclease-induced double-strand break , 2019, Nature.

[54]  Shondra M Pruett-Miller,et al.  High-frequency genome editing using ssDNA oligonucleotides with zinc-finger nucleases , 2011, Nature Methods.

[55]  Takanori Nakane,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Minimal Cas9 from Campylobacter jejuni Reveals the Molecular Diversity in the CRISPR-Cas9 Systems. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[56]  Namritha Ravinder,et al.  Rapid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via Cas9 protein transfection. , 2015, Journal of biotechnology.

[57]  Wei Ge,et al.  An efficient platform for generating somatic point mutations with germline transmission in the zebrafish by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing , 2018, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[58]  Prashant Mali,et al.  Orthogonal Cas9 Proteins for RNA-Guided Gene Regulation and Editing , 2013, Nature Methods.

[59]  Yifan Huang,et al.  Hochberg's Step-Up Method: Cutting Corners Off Holm's Step-Down Method , 2007 .

[60]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Functional repair of CFTR by CRISPR/Cas9 in intestinal stem cell organoids of cystic fibrosis patients. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[61]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Systematic evaluation of CRISPR-Cas systems reveals design principles for genome editing in human cells , 2018, Genome Biology.

[62]  J. Lebbink,et al.  Genome editing by natural and engineered CRISPR-associated nucleases , 2018, Nature Chemical Biology.

[63]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Generation of knock-in primary human T cells using Cas9 ribonucleoproteins , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  Masato Ohtsuka,et al.  Easi-CRISPR for creating knock-in and conditional knockout mouse models using long ssDNA donors , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[65]  B. van Steensel,et al.  Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[66]  David Baltimore,et al.  Chimeric Nucleases Stimulate Gene Targeting in Human Cells , 2003, Science.

[67]  T. Eickbush,et al.  Origin and evolution of retroelements based upon their reverse transcriptase sequences. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[68]  Daesik Kim,et al.  Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins , 2014, Genome research.

[69]  Knut Stieger,et al.  Optimizing the DNA Donor Template for Homology-Directed Repair of Double-Strand Breaks , 2017, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[70]  Jonathan S. Weissman,et al.  Design and specificity of long ssDNA donors for CRISPR-based knock-in , 2017, bioRxiv.

[71]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[72]  G. P. Smith,et al.  Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. , 1985, Science.