1 EX / P 647 Big Data Machine Learning for Disruption Predictions

Building the scientific foundations needed to develop fusion power in a timely way can be facilitated not only by familiar “hypothesis-driven”/ first principles approaches but also by engaging modern bigdata-driven statistical methods featuring machine learning (ML) -an exciting R&D approach that is increasingly deployed in many scientific and industrial domains. An especially time-urgent and very challenging problem facing the development of a fusion energy reactor today is the need to deal reliably with large-scale major disruptions in magnetically-confined tokamak systems such as the Joint European Torus (JET) today and the burning plasma ITER device in the near future. Significantly improved methods of prediction with better than 95% predictive capability are required to provide sufficient advanced warning for disruption avoidance or mitigation strategies to be effectively applied before critical damage is done to the machine. The supervised machine learning classification technique featured in Support Vector Machines (SVM’s) has been further advanced to this end and will be presented in this paper together with early results from ML studies utilizing multi-dimensional signal data to initiate the development of cross-machine-portable predictors. Working on it’s repository of the most important and largest (nearly a half petabyte and growing) data base of fusion-grade plasmas, JET’s statistical scientists have successfully deployed ML software interfaced with the large JET data base over the course of the past 7 years. This has produced encouraging results involving primarily the application of the SVM approach. The goals for the present investigations are to: (i) achieve greater predictive reliability by improving the physics fidelity of the classifiers within the “supervised” ML workflow; and (ii) establishing the cross-machine portability of the associated software beyond JET to other current tokamak systems and to ITER in the future. In order to so, it will be necessary to address the more realistic multi-dimensional, time-dependent, and much larger complex data instead of the simpler zerodimensional, temporal data considered at present in all of the JET ML studies.

[1]  J. Manickam,et al.  Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions , 2007 .

[2]  Andrea Murari,et al.  An advanced disruption predictor for JET tested in a simulated real-time environment , 2010 .

[3]  Geoffrey C. Fox,et al.  Generative topographic mapping by deterministic annealing , 2010, ICCS.

[4]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[5]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  A cross-tokamak neural network disruption predictor for the JET and ASDEX Upgrade tokamaks , 2005 .

[6]  G. Pautasso,et al.  Requirements for Triggering the ITER Disruption Mitigation System , 2016 .

[7]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Improved feature selection based on genetic algorithms for real time disruption prediction on JET , 2012 .

[8]  J. Contributors,et al.  Survey of disruption causes at JET , 2011 .

[9]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[10]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Status of research toward the ITER disruption mitigation system , 2015 .

[11]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[12]  J. Vega,et al.  Results of the JET real-time disruption predictor in the ITER-like wall campaigns , 2012 .

[13]  F C Schuller,et al.  Disruptions in tokamaks , 1995 .

[14]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing , 2007 .

[15]  Piergiorgio Sonato,et al.  Support Vector Machines for disruption prediction and novelty detection at JET , 2007 .

[16]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Development of an efficient real-time disruption predictor from scratch on JET and implications for ITER , 2013 .

[17]  J. Vega,et al.  Adaptive high learning rate probabilistic disruption predictors from scratch for the next generation of tokamaks , 2014 .