Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of two tropical seaweeds.

The chemical composition of red seaweed Gracilaria cervicornis and brown seaweed Sargassum vulgare from Brazil was investigated. In this study, the relationship between the nutritive components of each species and the environment was established. Protein content varied from 23.05+/-3.04% to 15.97+/-3.04%. The highest value was found in G. cervicornis. The protein levels were positively correlated with nitrogen content and negatively with water temperature and salinity. Carbohydrate contents of both species varied significantly (p<0.01) and the values observed were superior to others chemical constituents. Contrary to carbohydrates, the lipid concentrations were the lowest recorded chemical component and varied slightly between the two species. Ash content was greater in S. vulgare (14.20+/-3.86) than in G. cervicornis (7.74+/-1.15). In general the variation in chemical composition was related to environment.

[1]  R. Armisén.  World-wide use and importance of Gracilaria , 1995, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[2]  P. Harrison,et al.  The physiological ecology of seaweeds , 1985 .

[3]  Joël Fleurence,et al.  Seaweed proteins: biochemical, nutritional aspects and potential uses , 1999 .

[4]  D. Robledo,et al.  Chemical and Mineral Composition of Six Potentially Edible Seaweed Species of Yucatán , 1997 .

[5]  J. Ramus,et al.  Ecological growth strategies in the seaweeds Gracilaria foliifera (Rhodophyceae) and Ulva sp. (Chlorophyceae): Soluble nitrogen and reserve carbohydrates , 1982 .

[6]  Paulo Nelo Medeiros Perfeto.  Relation between chemical composition of Grateloupia doryphora (Montagne) Howe, Gymnogongrus griffithsiae (Turner) Martius, and abiotic parameters , 1998 .

[7]  Annual variations of the biochemical composition of Gelidium latifolium (Greville) Thuret et Bornet , 1993 .

[8]  J. Fleurence,et al.  Seaweed in food products: biochemical and nutritional aspects , 1993 .

[9]  G. Trono.  Diversity of the seaweed flora of the Philippines and its utilization , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[10]  J. Huisman.  Vegetables from the sea , 2006 .

[11]  I. Wallentinus.  Comparisons of nutrient uptake rates for Baltic macroalgae with different thallus morphologies , 1984 .

[12]  M. Indergaard,et al.  Animal and human nutrition , 1991 .

[13]  W. Horwitz.  Official Methods of Analysis , 1980 .

[14]  C. S. James.  Analytical Chemistry of Foods , 2014 .

[15]  A. Rotem,et al.  EFFECT OF CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ON STARCH AND AGAR CONTENTS OF GRACILARIA SP. (RHODOPHYCEAE) 1 , 1986 .

[16]  A. Hodgson,et al.  Consumption and apparent dry matter digestibility of six intertidal macroalgae by Turbo sarmaticus (Mollusca : Vetigastropoda Turbinidae) , 1998 .

[17]  F. Pérez-Gil,et al.  Chemical composition and microbiological assays of marine algae Enteromorpha spp. as a potential food source , 2005 .

[18]  M. H. Norziah,et al.  Nutritional composition of edible seaweed Gracilaria changgi , 2000 .

[19]  M. Guiry,et al.  Seaweed resources in Europe: uses and potential , 1991 .

[20]  I. Munda,et al.  Chemical composition and physiological properties of fucoids under conditions of reduced salinity , 1977 .

[21]  P. Cheung,et al.  Nutritional evaluation of some subtropical red and green seaweeds: Part I — proximate composition, amino acid profiles and some physico-chemical properties , 2000 .