Interactive scenario modelling for hazard perception in driver training

Vehicular traffic flow is a complex interaction between drivers, vehicles, and the road infrastructure. These interactions can be viewed as human-machine systems, describing the relationship between driver (human) and vehicle (machine) and the reciprocity of the driver-vehicle system with the environment. The driver component of the system is the most complex as they are generally characterised by higherlevel processes. These processes include perceptual capabilities such as vision, hearing and sensation of forces on the body; cognitive functions, for example motivation and attitude; and control functions, such as limb coordination enabling steering and braking. Existing methodologies for representing these processes are limited in three fundamental ways: (1) the ‘lower level’ of detail in the modelling (2) the lack of behavioural intelligence within the modelled system and (3) the failure to integrate the three key elements of driver, vehicle and road infrastructure. The paper examines various driver behaviour models. It then focuses on the development of a framework for complex and interactive scenario modelling, particularly applied to hazard perception for driver training. A key element of this framework is the flexibility of qualitative visualisation, enabling a scenario to be seen from various viewpoints. The main aim of developing such a framework is to provide a modelling environment that can integrate theory, algorithms, software and experimental results generated by engineers and scientists in all of the traditionally disparate areas of driver-, vehicle-, trafficand highway research. The framework has been validated using empirical data obtained from TRL’s driving (car) simulator, to assess driver perceptual and cognitive skills required in vehicle control to avoid collision with a parked car. In the context of hazard perception, the validation has demonstrated the potential of using the framework as a comprehensive modelling tool for engineers, scientists and decision-makers working in many commercial aspects of road transport.

[1]  Rebecca Lawton,et al.  Not working to rule: Understanding procedural violations at work , 1998 .

[2]  J. E. Arnold,et al.  AN AUTOMATA BASED SIMULATION OFCO-OPERATIVE DECISION MAKING , 1970 .

[3]  Theodore J. Rosenthal,et al.  Modeling and simulation of driver-vehicle interaction , 1996 .

[4]  S McCormack RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DRIVER TRAINING , 2003 .

[5]  F P McKenna,et al.  HAZARD PERCEPTION IN DRIVERS: A METHODOLOGY FOR TESTING AND TRAINING , 1994 .

[6]  Julian Hill,et al.  Simulation of driver, vehicle and environmental aspects of crash initiation, a new method to improve integrated safety effectiveness , 2003 .

[7]  Arnoud Visser,et al.  Traffic simulation , 2001, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[8]  G B Grayson,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF HAZARD PERCEPTION TESTING , 2002 .

[9]  Christophe Kolski,et al.  Traffic generation with the SCANeR © II simulator : towards a multi-agent architecture , 2022 .

[10]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Car-following: a historical review , 1999 .

[11]  Theodore J. Rosenthal,et al.  SCENARIOS PRODUCED BY PROCEDURAL METHODS FOR DRIVING RESEARCH, ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING APPLICATIONS , 2003 .

[12]  A J McKnight,et al.  DRIVER EDUCATION TASK ANALYSIS. VOLUME 1: TASK DESCRIPTIONS , 1970 .

[13]  C R Lockwood,et al.  The accident liability of car drivers , 1991 .

[14]  T. Rundmo,et al.  Personality, risky driving and accident involvement among Norwegian drivers , 2002 .

[15]  Pete Thomas,et al.  An agent-based traffic simulation framework to model intelligent virtual driver behaviour , 2002 .

[16]  Matti Pursula,et al.  SIMULATION OF TRAFFIC SYSTEMS : AN OVERVIEW , 1998 .

[17]  A. Quimby,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS AND DRIVING PERFORMANCE , 1981 .

[18]  Andrew M. Parkes Improved realism and improved utility of driving simulators: are they mutually exclusive? , 2005 .

[19]  Timothy Gordon,et al.  An automated driver based on convergent vector fields , 2002 .

[20]  Abdulai D. Dumbuya,et al.  Visual perception modelling for intelligent virtual driver agents in synthetic driving simulation , 2003, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[21]  P. Ulleberg PERSONALITY SUBTYPES OF YOUNG DRIVERS. RELATIONSHIP TO RISK-TAKING PREFERENCES, ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT, AND RESPONSE TO A TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMPAIGN , 2001 .

[22]  R. Rothery CAR FOLLOWING MODELS , 1997 .