Latency of Verbal Response and Participation in Small Groups

Studies relating an individual's participation in a group discussion to his subsequent status in that group are examined. A review of experimental evidence suggests that the generally accepted explanation of how participation is translated into status is inadequate. A supplementary explanatory model is offered which gives a central role to the individual's latency of verbal response. The study focuses on the predictive ability of a new index of participation potential, latency of verbal response (LVR), which is based on the average time taken to begin speaking when asked to complete sentence stubs. This new predictor is tested against alternatives suggested by earlier research and proves to be more effective in predicting participation. The results are discussed in terms of the conditions under which we might expect different predictors to vary in effectiveness.

[1]  A. Pepitone,et al.  Deindividuation in the small group: further evidence. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  J. Loevinger,et al.  Measuring Ego Development , 1970 .

[3]  S. Feldstein,et al.  Rhythms of dialogue , 1970 .

[4]  Cabot L. Jaffee,et al.  Effects of Rates of Talking and Correctness of Decisions on Leader Choice in Small Groups , 1969 .

[5]  C. L. Jaffee,et al.  Effects of High-Rate Talkers on Group Voting Behavior in the Leaderless-Group Problem-Solving Situation , 1969, Psychological reports.

[6]  S. I. Shapiro Response word frequency in paired-associates learning , 1969 .

[7]  G. Miller,et al.  Plans and the structure of behavior , 1960 .

[8]  A. Gross,et al.  The Perception and Evaluation of Behavior Change , 1965 .

[9]  W. Richard Kite,et al.  Experiments on the alteration of group structure , 1965 .

[10]  E. Timmons,et al.  The stability of group verbal behavior , 1962 .

[11]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  The social dimensions of a twelve-man jury table. , 1961 .

[12]  R. Mann A review of the relationships between personality and performance in small groups. , 1959 .

[13]  T. M. Lodahl,et al.  Some factors in the selection of leaders by members of small groups. , 1959, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  J. Matarazzo,et al.  A technique for studying changes in interview behavior. , 1959 .

[15]  J. Matarazzo,et al.  The Interaction Chronograph as an Instrument for Objective Measurement of Interaction Patterns During Interviews , 1956 .

[16]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Sex Role Differentiation in Jury Deliberations , 1956 .

[17]  R. Cattell,et al.  Four Formulae for Selecting Leaders on the Basis of Personality , 1954 .

[18]  B. Bass,et al.  Situational and personality factors in leadership among sorority women. , 1953 .

[19]  L. Festinger,et al.  Some consequences of de-individuation in a group , 1952 .

[20]  F. Goldman-Eisler THE MEASUREMENT OF TIME SEQUENCES IN CONVERSATIONAL BEHAVIOUR , 1951 .

[21]  W. Haythorn,et al.  The behavior of leaders and other group members. , 1951, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[22]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Husband-wife interaction over revealed differences. , 1951 .

[23]  Bobbie Norfleet,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Productivity , 1948 .

[24]  E. Chapple,et al.  "Measuring Human Relations: An Introduction to the Study of the Interaction of Individuals." , 1941 .