AN INTEGRATED PERSPECTIVE ON THE ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGIES: INTEGRATE-HTA.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Louise Brereton | Jacob Burns | Ansgar Gerhardus | Kati Mozygemba | Wija Oortwijn | Eva Rehfuess | Philip Wahlster | Björn Hofmann | Lisa Pfadenhauer | Stephanie Polus | Imke Schilling | Gert Jan van der Wilt
[1] Kate Flemming,et al. Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions , 2016 .
[2] Dario Sacchini,et al. Lay and professional stakeholder involvement in scoping palliative care issues: Methods used in seven European countries , 2017, Palliative medicine.
[3] Louise Brereton,et al. A CONSULTATION GUIDE FOR ASSESSING THE APPLICABILITY OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES:A CASE STUDY , 2017, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[4] Louise Brereton,et al. Guidance on the use of logic models in health technology assessments of complex interventions , 2016 .
[5] Dario Sacchini,et al. Integrated assessment of home based palliative care with and without reinforced caregiver support: ‘A demonstration of INTEGRATE-HTA methodological guidances’ – Executive Summary , 2016 .
[6] Richard Horton. Offline: The error of our health technology assessment ways , 2013, The Lancet.
[7] Paul C Langley,et al. Imaginary Worlds: The European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Recommendations for Health Economic Evaluations , 2016 .
[8] Andrew Booth,et al. Series: Clinical Epidemiology in South Africa. Paper 3: Logic models help make sense of complexity in systematic reviews and health technology assessments. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[9] Janet E Squires,et al. Systematic reviews of complex interventions: framing the review question. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[10] Theodor J. Stewart,et al. Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .
[11] Finn Børlum Kristensen,et al. The HTA Core Model: A novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[12] M. Degroot. Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .
[13] Peter Kolominsky-Rabas,et al. Exploring the perspectives and preferences for HTA across German healthcare stakeholders using a multi-criteria assessment of a pulmonary heart sensor as a case study , 2015, Health Research Policy and Systems.
[14] Laura Weeks,et al. USING THE INTEGRATE-HTA GUIDANCE: EXPERIENCE FROM CADTH. , 2017, International journal of technology assessment in health care.
[15] Marcia Tummers,et al. Guidance for the assessment of treatment moderation and patients ’ preferences 4 , 2016 .
[16] Andrew Booth,et al. Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework , 2017, Implementation Science.
[17] Louise Brereton,et al. Guidance on the integrated assessment of complex health technologies - The INTEGRATE-HTA Model , 2016 .
[18] Bjørn Hofmann,et al. Complex health care interventions: Characteristics relevant for ethical analysis in health technology assessment , 2016, GMS health technology assessment.
[19] L. Erickson,et al. Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications , 2008, BMC health services research.
[20] P. Wahlster,et al. Balancing costs and benefits at different stages of medical innovation: a systematic review of Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) , 2015, BMC Health Services Research.