AN INTEGRATED PERSPECTIVE ON THE ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGIES: INTEGRATE-HTA.

OBJECTIVES Current health technology assessment (HTA) is not well equipped to assess complex technologies as insufficient attention is being paid to the diversity in patient characteristics and preferences, context, and implementation. Strategies to integrate these and several other aspects, such as ethical considerations, in a comprehensive assessment are missing. The aim of the European research project INTEGRATE-HTA was to develop a model for an integrated HTA of complex technologies. METHODS A multi-method, four-stage approach guided the development of the INTEGRATE-HTA Model: (i) definition of the different dimensions of information to be integrated, (ii) literature review of existing methods for integration, (iii) adjustment of concepts and methods for assessing distinct aspects of complex technologies in the frame of an integrated process, and (iv) application of the model in a case study and subsequent revisions. RESULTS The INTEGRATE-HTA Model consists of five steps, each involving stakeholders: (i) definition of the technology and the objective of the HTA; (ii) development of a logic model to provide a structured overview of the technology and the system in which it is embedded; (iii) evidence assessment on effectiveness, economic, ethical, legal, and socio-cultural aspects, taking variability of participants, context, implementation issues, and their interactions into account; (iv) populating the logic model with the data generated in step 3; (v) structured process of decision-making. CONCLUSIONS The INTEGRATE-HTA Model provides a structured process for integrated HTAs of complex technologies. Stakeholder involvement in all steps is essential as a means of ensuring relevance and meaningful interpretation of the evidence.

[1]  Kate Flemming,et al.  Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions , 2016 .

[2]  Dario Sacchini,et al.  Lay and professional stakeholder involvement in scoping palliative care issues: Methods used in seven European countries , 2017, Palliative medicine.

[3]  Louise Brereton,et al.  A CONSULTATION GUIDE FOR ASSESSING THE APPLICABILITY OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES:A CASE STUDY , 2017, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  Louise Brereton,et al.  Guidance on the use of logic models in health technology assessments of complex interventions , 2016 .

[5]  Dario Sacchini,et al.  Integrated assessment of home based palliative care with and without reinforced caregiver support: ‘A demonstration of INTEGRATE-HTA methodological guidances’ – Executive Summary , 2016 .

[6]  Richard Horton Offline: The error of our health technology assessment ways , 2013, The Lancet.

[7]  Paul C Langley,et al.  Imaginary Worlds: The European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Recommendations for Health Economic Evaluations , 2016 .

[8]  Andrew Booth,et al.  Series: Clinical Epidemiology in South Africa. Paper 3: Logic models help make sense of complexity in systematic reviews and health technology assessments. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  Janet E Squires,et al.  Systematic reviews of complex interventions: framing the review question. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[11]  Finn Børlum Kristensen,et al.  The HTA Core Model: A novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[13]  Peter Kolominsky-Rabas,et al.  Exploring the perspectives and preferences for HTA across German healthcare stakeholders using a multi-criteria assessment of a pulmonary heart sensor as a case study , 2015, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[14]  Laura Weeks,et al.  USING THE INTEGRATE-HTA GUIDANCE: EXPERIENCE FROM CADTH. , 2017, International journal of technology assessment in health care.

[15]  Marcia Tummers,et al.  Guidance for the assessment of treatment moderation and patients ’ preferences 4 , 2016 .

[16]  Andrew Booth,et al.  Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework , 2017, Implementation Science.

[17]  Louise Brereton,et al.  Guidance on the integrated assessment of complex health technologies - The INTEGRATE-HTA Model , 2016 .

[18]  Bjørn Hofmann,et al.  Complex health care interventions: Characteristics relevant for ethical analysis in health technology assessment , 2016, GMS health technology assessment.

[19]  L. Erickson,et al.  Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications , 2008, BMC health services research.

[20]  P. Wahlster,et al.  Balancing costs and benefits at different stages of medical innovation: a systematic review of Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) , 2015, BMC Health Services Research.