A Monte Carlo method and finite volume method coupled optical simulation method for parabolic trough solar collectors

The PTC (parabolic trough solar collector) is widely used for space heating, heat-driven refrigeration, solar power, etc. The concentrated solar radiation is the only energy source for a PTC, thus its optical performance significantly affects the collector efficiency. In this study, four different optical models were constructed, validated and compared in detail. On this basis, a novel coupled method was presented by combining advantages of these models, which was suited to carry out a mass of optical simulations of collectors with different geometrical parameters rapidly and accurately. Based on these simulation results, the optimal configuration of a collector with highest efficiency can be determined. Thus, this method was useful for collector optimization and design. In the four models, MCM (Monte Carlo Method) and FVM (Finite Volume Method) were used to initialize photons distribution, as well as CPEM (Change Photon Energy Method) and MCM were adopted to describe the process of reflecting, transmitting and absorbing. For simulating reflection, transmission and absorption, CPEM was more efficient than MCM, so it was utilized in the coupled method. For photons distribution initialization, FVM saved running time and computation effort, whereas it needed suitable grid configuration. MCM only required a total number of rays for simulation, whereas it needed higher computing cost and its results fluctuated in multiple runs. In the novel coupled method, the grid configuration for FVM was optimized according to the “true values” from MCM of collectors with the maximum geometry difference. Following this, the initialization of photons distribution of collectors with different geometries were conducted with FVM. To demonstrate this coupled model in real practice, performance analysis of a kind of cavity receiver for PTCs was carried out. The judgment of collectors with maximum geometry difference were worth investigating further in the future work.

[1]  K. S. Reddy,et al.  Optical modelling and performance analysis of a solar LFR receiver system with parabolic and involute secondary reflectors , 2016 .

[2]  Roberto Grena,et al.  Optical simulation of a parabolic solar trough collector , 2010 .

[3]  Suneet Singh,et al.  Analytical expression for circumferential and axial distribution of absorbed flux on a bent absorber tube of solar parabolic trough concentrator , 2013 .

[4]  S. Jeter Analytical determination of the optical performance of practical parabolic trough collectors from design data , 1987 .

[5]  Shi-jun You,et al.  Comparison of three optical models and analysis of geometric parameters for parabolic trough solar collectors , 2016 .

[6]  Jifeng Song,et al.  An algorithm for the flux distribution over the flat absorber of a parabolic trough concentrator , 2016 .

[7]  Ya-Ling He,et al.  Numerical simulation of a parabolic trough solar collector with nonuniform solar flux conditions by coupling FVM and MCRT method , 2012 .

[8]  Yuwen Zhang,et al.  A novel integrated simulation approach couples MCRT and Gebhart methods to simulate solar radiation transfer in a solar power tower system with a cavity receiver , 2016 .

[9]  Yang Xu,et al.  Comparative and sensitive analysis for parabolic trough solar collectors with a detailed Monte Carlo ray-tracing optical model , 2014 .

[10]  Qiang Zhu,et al.  Calculation of the Concentrated Flux Density Distribution in Parabolic Trough Solar Concentrators by Monte Carlo Ray-Trace Method , 2010, 2010 Symposium on Photonics and Optoelectronics.

[11]  Ya-Ling He,et al.  A new modelling method and unified code with MCRT for concentrating solar collectors and its applications , 2013 .

[12]  Yu Qiu,et al.  A comprehensive model for analysis of real-time optical performance of a solar power tower with a multi-tube cavity receiver , 2017 .

[13]  Huan Zhang,et al.  Comparison of different heat transfer models for parabolic trough solar collectors , 2015 .

[14]  Distribution of Energy Density and Optimization on the Surface of the Receiver for Parabolic Trough Solar Concentrator , 2015 .

[15]  C. Dey,et al.  Sunshape distributions for terrestrial solar simulations , 2003 .

[17]  Ya-Ling He,et al.  A MCRT and FVM coupled simulation method for energy conversion process in parabolic trough solar collector , 2011 .

[18]  Aránzazu Fernández-García,et al.  Modeling and co-simulation of a parabolic trough solar plant for industrial process heat , 2013 .

[19]  Qi Liang,et al.  Geometric optimization on optical performance of parabolic trough solar collector systems using particle swarm optimization algorithm , 2015 .

[20]  Saad Mahmoud,et al.  The optical efficiency of three different geometries of a small scale cavity receiver for concentrated solar applications , 2016 .

[21]  J. Daly Solar concentrator flux distributions using backward ray tracing. , 1979, Applied optics.

[22]  Sheldon M. Jeter,et al.  Calculation of the concentrated flux density distribution in parabolic trough collectors by a semifinite formulation , 1986 .

[23]  Wang Fuqiang,et al.  Parabolic trough receiver with corrugated tube for improving heat transfer and thermal deformation characteristics , 2016 .

[24]  Ahmed Amine Hachicha,et al.  Heat transfer analysis and numerical simulation of a parabolic trough solar collector , 2013 .

[25]  Guoqiang Xu,et al.  Optical sensitivity analysis of geometrical deformation on the parabolic trough solar collector with Monte Carlo Ray-Trace method , 2016 .