The influence of cruise control and adaptive cruise control on driving behaviour--a driving simulator study.

Although Cruise Control (CC) is available for most cars, no studies have been found which examine how this automation system influences driving behaviour. However, a relatively large number of studies have examined Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) which compared to CC includes also a distance control. Besides positive effects with regard to a better compliance to speed limits, there are also indications of smaller distances to lead vehicles and slower responses in situations that require immediate braking. Similar effects can be expected for CC as this system takes over longitudinal control as well. To test this hypothesis, a simulator study was conducted at the German Aerospace Center (DLR). Twenty-two participants drove different routes (highway and motorway) under three different conditions (assisted by ACC, CC and manual driving without any system). Different driving scenarios were examined including a secondary task condition. On the one hand, both systems lead to lower maximum velocities and less speed limit violations. There was no indication that drivers shift more of their attention towards secondary tasks when driving with CC or ACC. However, there were delayed driver reactions in critical situations, e.g., in a narrow curve or a fog bank. These results give rise to some caution regarding the safety effects of these systems, especially if in the future their range of functionality (e.g., ACC Stop-and-Go) is further increased.

[1]  J. Trnros,et al.  EFFECTS OF ACC ON DRIVER BEHAVIOUR, WORKLOAD AND ACCEPTANCE IN RELATION TO MINIMUM TIME HEADWAY , 2002 .

[2]  John D. Lee,et al.  Driver Distraction : Theory, Effects, and Mitigation , 2008 .

[3]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Back to the future: Brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles , 2007, Ergonomics.

[5]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Taking the load off: investigations of how adaptive cruise control affects mental workload , 2004, Ergonomics.

[6]  Christina M. Rudin-Brown,et al.  BEHAVIOURAL ADAPTATION TO ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (ACC): IMPLICATIONS FOR PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES , 2004 .

[7]  G. R. J. Hockey Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[8]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Malleable Attentional Resources Theory: A New Explanation for the Effects of Mental Underload on Performance , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Effects of driving style on headway preference and acceptance of an adaptive cruise control (ACC) , 1998 .

[10]  Marika Hoedemaeker,et al.  Behavioural adaptation to driving with an adaptive cruise control (ACC) , 1998 .

[11]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control , 2005, Ergonomics.

[12]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Attention and automation: New perspectives on mental underload and performance , 2002 .

[13]  Stefan Mattes,et al.  Surrogate Distraction Measurement Techniques: The Lane Change Test , 2009 .

[14]  Mark S. Young,et al.  The Role of Mental Models in Using Adaptive Cruise Control , 2000 .

[15]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Drive-by-wire: The case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control , 1997 .