Coupled simulation of multibody and finite element systems: an efficient and robust semi-implicit coupling approach

Standard coupling approaches for simulating coupled MBS/FEM systems may entail enormous CPU times in order to achieve a stable and accurate solution. To stabilize and speed up the solution process, semi-implicit coupling approaches can be applied successfully. In literature, semi-implicit coupling approaches have been introduced, where Jacobian information is exchanged between the subsystems using partial derivatives with respect to the state vectors of the subsystems. The drawback of these methods is that the numerical calculation of the Jacobians with respect to the whole state vector of the subsystems is very time-consuming. The key idea of the semi-implicit coupling technique presented here is to reduce the computational effort by using Jacobian information only with respect to the coupling variables.The semi-implicit coupling technique introduced here is exemplarily applied for coupling a commercial MBS code with a commercial FEM code. As a practical example, we consider a hybrid nonlinear rotor/bearing model of a high-speed turbine. The rotor is modeled as a flexible multibody system. For calculating the bearing reactions, a finite element discretization of Reynolds fluid film equation is applied which yields the pressure distribution in the fluid films of the hydrodynamic bearings. Both codes are coupled via interprocess communication (IPC). A very time-efficient implementation of the semi-implicit coupling approach can be accomplished by a parallelization on multiple CPUs.

[1]  Michael Beitelschmidt,et al.  Standard input data for FEM–MBS coupling: importing alternative model reduction methods into SIMPACK , 2009 .

[2]  Andras Z. Szeri,et al.  Fluid Film Lubrication: Theory and Design , 1998 .

[3]  A. Carrarini,et al.  Coupled Multibody‐Aerodynamic Simulation of High‐Speed Trains Manoeuvres , 2003 .

[4]  K. Bathe,et al.  Finite element developments for general fluid flows with structural interactions , 2004 .

[5]  M. Bampton,et al.  Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. , 1968 .

[6]  Bernhard Schweizer,et al.  Oil whirl, oil whip and whirl/whip synchronization occurring in rotor systems with full-floating ring bearings , 2009 .

[7]  C. Kelley Solving Nonlinear Equations with Newton's Method , 1987 .

[8]  Martin Arnold,et al.  Pantograph and catenary dynamics: a benchmark problem and its numerical solution , 2000 .

[9]  Linda R. Petzold,et al.  Numerical solution of initial-value problems in differential-algebraic equations , 1996, Classics in applied mathematics.

[10]  Her Mann Tsai,et al.  Calculation of Wing Flutter by a Coupled Fluid-Structure Method , 2001 .

[11]  Helmut Podhaisky,et al.  Numerik gewöhnlicher Differentialgleichungen , 2012 .

[12]  Bernhard Schweizer,et al.  Dynamics of rotating thermoelastic disks with stationary heat source , 2010, Appl. Math. Comput..

[13]  K. Bathe Finite-Elemente-Methoden , 1986 .

[14]  Philipp Birken,et al.  A time-adaptive fluid-structure interaction method for thermal coupling , 2010, Comput. Vis. Sci..

[15]  A. Cameron Basic lubrication theory , 1976 .

[16]  P. K. Goenka,et al.  Dynamically Loaded Journal Bearings: Finite Element Method Analysis , 1984 .

[17]  Martin Arnold,et al.  Coupled Simulation of Multibody Systems and Elastic Structures , 1999 .

[18]  Werner Schiehlen,et al.  Two Methods of Simulator Coupling , 2000 .

[19]  Bernhard Schweizer,et al.  Total instability of turbocharger rotors—Physical explanation of the dynamic failure of rotors with full-floating ring bearings , 2009 .

[20]  Wolfgang Mathis,et al.  Hybrid Numerical Simulation of Micro Electro Mechanical Systems , 2006 .

[21]  J. M. T. Penrose,et al.  Implicit fluid–structure coupling for simulation of cardiovascular problems , 2002 .

[22]  C. Proppe,et al.  Bifurcation Analysis of a Turbocharger Rotor Supported by Floating Ring Bearings , 2011 .

[23]  D. Hinrichsen,et al.  Mathematical Systems Theory I: Modelling, State Space Analysis, Stability and Robustness , 2010 .

[24]  Delf Sachau,et al.  Fatigue Life Prediction of a Railway Bogie under Dynamic Loads through Simulation , 1998 .

[25]  Bernhard Schweizer,et al.  Dynamics and stability of turbocharger rotors , 2010 .

[26]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  A Memory Based Communication in the Co-simulation of Multibody and Finite Element Codes for Pantograph-Catenary Interaction Simulation , 2009 .

[27]  Stefan Schmitt,et al.  Coupled simulation of flow-structure interaction in turbomachinery , 2003 .

[28]  Daniel Rixen,et al.  Numerical modelling of electromechanical coupling using fictitious domain and level set methods , 2009 .

[29]  Masato Tanaka,et al.  Stability Characteristics of Floating Bush Bearings , 1972 .

[30]  Martin Arnold,et al.  A Modal Multifield Approach for an Extended Flexible Body Description in Multibody Dynamics , 2005 .

[31]  Nicholas C. Baines Fundamentals of Turbocharging , 2005 .

[32]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Dynamics of Multibody Systems , 2020 .

[33]  Andreas Schütte,et al.  Multibody Simulation of an Aeroelastic Delta Wing in Roll Manoeuvres , 2006 .

[34]  Martin Arnold,et al.  Multi-Rate Time Integration for Large Scale Multibody System Models , 2007 .

[35]  Peter Schwarz,et al.  Electro-thermal circuit simulation using simulator coupling , 1997, IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst..