CT perfusion based ASPECTS improves the diagnostic performance of early ischemic changes in large vessel occlusion

Background ASPECTS scoring method varies, but which one is most suitable for predicting the prognosis still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Automated (Auto)-, noncontrast CT (NCCT)- and CT perfusion (CTP) -ASPECTS for early ischemic changes (EICs) in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and to explore which scoring method is most suitable for predicting the clinical outcome. Methods Eighty-one patients with anterior circulation LVO were retrospectively enrolled and grouped as having a good (0–2) or poor (3–6) clinical outcome using a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score. Clinical characteristics and perfusion parameters were compared between the patients with good and poor outcomes. Differences in scores obtained with the three scoring methods were assessed. Diagnosis performance and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the value of the three ordinal or dichotomized ASPECTS methods for predicting the clinical outcome. Results Sixty-three patients were finally included, with 36 (57.1%) patients having good clinical outcome. Significant differences were observed in the ordinal or dichotomized Auto-, NCCT- and CTP-ASPECTS between the patients with good and poor clinical outcomes (all p  < 0.01). The areas under the curves (AUCs) of the ordinal and dichotomized CTP-ASPECTS were higher than that of the other two methods (all p  < 0.01), but the AUCs of the Auto-ASPECTS was similar to that of the NCCT-ASPECTS ( p  > 0.05). Conclusions The CTP-ASPECTS is superior to the Auto- and NCCT-ASPECTS in detecting EICs in LVO. CTP-ASPECTS with a cutoff value of 6 is a good predictor of the clinical outcome at 90-day follow-up.

[1]  Douglas K. S. Ng,et al.  An image feature approach for computer-aided detection of ischemic stroke , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[2]  W. Jones Alberta , 1978 .

[3]  H. Diener,et al.  Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy , 2000, The Lancet.

[5]  C. Teljeur,et al.  Acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of emergency endovascular therapy using mechanical thrombectomy , 2018, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).

[6]  C. Levi,et al.  The independent predictive utility of computed tomography angiographic collateral status in acute ischaemic stroke. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  R. Swartz,et al.  Interobserver Agreement of ASPECT Score Distribution for Noncontrast CT, CT Angiography, and CT Perfusion in Acute Stroke , 2013, Stroke.

[9]  D. Rueckert,et al.  Prediction of stroke thrombolysis outcome using CT brain machine learning , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[10]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Interobserver Variation of ASPECTS in Real Time , 2004, Stroke.

[11]  B. Campbell,et al.  Reliability, Reproducibility and Prognostic Accuracy of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score on CT Perfusion and Non-Contrast CT in Hyperacute Stroke , 2017, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[12]  B. Molyneaux,et al.  Interaction between time, ASPECTS, and clinical mismatch , 2020, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[13]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  T. Krings,et al.  Per-region interobserver agreement of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scores (ASPECTS) , 2020, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[15]  A. Yoo,et al.  ASPECTS CT in Acute Ischemia: Review of Current Data. , 2017, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[16]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Automated ASPECTS on Noncontrast CT Scans in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Machine Learning , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  Yong Jiang,et al.  Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality of Stroke in China: Results from a Nationwide Population-Based Survey of 480 687 Adults , 2017, Circulation.

[18]  Claus Zimmer,et al.  Automated Calculation of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score: Feasibility and Reliability. , 2019, Radiology.

[19]  M. Bendszus,et al.  e-ASPECTS Correlates with and Is Predictive of Outcome after Mechanical Thrombectomy , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[20]  C. Molina,et al.  CBV_ASPECTS Improvement over CT_ASPECTS on Determining Irreversible Ischemic Lesion Decreases over Time , 2016, Interventional Neurology.

[21]  M. Knauth,et al.  Computed tomography perfusion-based selection of endovascularly treated acute ischaemic stroke patients – Are there lessons to be learned from the pre-evidence era? , 2017, The neuroradiology journal.

[22]  Christopher S Coffey,et al.  2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association , 2015, Stroke.

[23]  J. Mocco,et al.  Automated ASPECTS in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Analysis with CT Perfusion , 2019, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[24]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[25]  Y. Zhou,et al.  Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  F. Sallustio,et al.  Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke , 2015 .

[27]  E. Arsava,et al.  Impact of window setting optimization on accuracy of computed tomography and computed tomography angiography source image-based Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score. , 2014, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[28]  Daniel Richter,et al.  Performance of e-ASPECTS software in comparison to that of stroke physicians on assessing CT scans of acute ischemic stroke patients , 2016, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[29]  M. Mlynash,et al.  Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Scoring Performance in a Series of Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography and MRI: Reader Agreement, Modality Agreement, and Outcome Prediction , 2015, Stroke.

[30]  Brian Silver,et al.  Importance of Early Ischemic Computed Tomography Changes Using ASPECTS in NINDS rtPA Stroke Study , 2005, Stroke.

[31]  D. Gladstone,et al.  Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scoring of CT Perfusion in Early Stroke Visualization and Assessment , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[32]  Christopher S. Coffey,et al.  2015 AHA/ASA Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment , 2015 .

[33]  Klaus Fassbender,et al.  e-ASPECTS software is non-inferior to neuroradiologists in applying the ASPECT score to computed tomography scans of acute ischemic stroke patients , 2017, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[34]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Effect of baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score on safety and efficacy of intra-arterial treatment: a subgroup analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial (MR CLEAN) , 2016, The Lancet Neurology.

[35]  M. Forsting,et al.  Detection of early infarction signs with machine learning-based diagnosis by means of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) in the clinical routine , 2018, Neuroradiology.

[36]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS Study Group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. , 2000, Lancet.