Laparoscopic diagnosis and management of splenogonadal fusion.

The fusion between splenic tissue and the gonads or derivatives of the mesonephros is a rare congenital anomaly. This was first described by Pommer in 1887. The diagnosis is usually made at operation or autopsy. Here we present a case of left splenotesticular fusion where the diagnosis was made intraoperatively and the testis was saved. The case is discussed with a review of the literature. Saudi MedBase CD-ROM contains all medical literature published in all medical journals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This is an electronic format with a massive database file containing useful medical facts that can be used for reference. Saudi Medbase is a prime selection of abstracts that are useful in clinical practice and in writing papers for publication. Related Abstract Source: Saudi MedBase

[1]  Sripathi Macro‐orchidism may be an indicator of continuous splenogonadal fusion , 1999, BJU international.

[2]  E. Dolev,et al.  Splenogonadal fusion diagnosed by spleen scintigraphy. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  J. Thorup,et al.  The pathogenesis of cryptorchidism and splenogonadal fusion: a new hypothesis. , 1996, British journal of urology.

[4]  A. Carragher One hundred years of splenogonadal fusion. , 1990, Urology.

[5]  W. Falkowski,et al.  Splenogonadal fusion associated with an anaplastic seminoma. , 1980, The Journal of urology.

[6]  S. Ashley,et al.  Splenogonadal fusion-a rare congenital anomaly demonstrated by 99Tc-sulfur colloid imaging: case report. , 1975, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  P. Eggum,et al.  Splenic-gonadal fusion causing bowel obstruction. , 1961, Archives of surgery.

[8]  W. Manion,et al.  Splenicgonadal fusion. , 1956, The American journal of pathology.

[9]  Sneath Wa An Apparent Third Testicle consisting of a Scrotal Spleen. , 1913 .

[10]  E. T. Gonzales,et al.  Splenogonadal fusion: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. , 1996, The Journal of urology.