Noise Robustness of a Texture Classification Protocol for Natural Leaf Roughness Characterisation

In the context of leaf roughness study for precision spray- ing applications, this article deals with its characterisation by computer vision techniques. Texture analysis is a pri- mordial step for applications based on image analysis such as medical or agronomical imaging. The aim is to classify textures after extraction of discriminating features. How- ever, this problem remains complex in the case of natural leaves because of changes in lighting, scaling or orienta- tion. There we consider a family of invariants from the frequency domain called Generalized Fourier Descriptors whose dimensionality is proportional to the spatial resolu- tion of the images. These features used with a Support Vec- tor Machines classifier lead to good results in terms of clas- sification error rate when the dimensionality is small but it gives more errors when the dimensionality increases; we use there different kinds of dimensionality reduction tech- niques (linear or non-linear) whose aim is to keep most in- formation in a vector of small dimensionality. It implies losses of information even if small. This is not the only source of losses, another one is related to the noise present in the images due to acquisition conditions and sensor sen- sitivity. We propose here to demonstrate the robustness of our method of classification despite these losses of infor- mation.

[1]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[2]  G. F. Hughes,et al.  On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  Pierre Gouton,et al.  Reduction of the number of spectral bands in Landsat images: a comparison of linear and nonlinear methods , 2006 .

[4]  D. Quéré,et al.  Bouncing water drops , 2000 .

[5]  David Zhang,et al.  Robust kernel discriminant analysis and its application to feature extraction and recognition , 2006, Neurocomputing.

[6]  Jean-Paul Gauthier,et al.  Harmonic Analysis : Motions and Pattern Analysis on Motion Groups and Their Homogeneous Spaces , 2004 .

[7]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[8]  W. A. Forster,et al.  A UNIVERSAL SPRAY DROPLET ADHESION MODEL , 2005 .

[9]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[10]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Effects on pesticide spray drift of the physicochemical properties of the spray liquid , 2009, Precision Agriculture.

[11]  Johel Mitéran,et al.  Texture Classification with Generalized Fourier Descriptors in Dimensionality Reduction Context: An Overview Exploration , 2008, ANNPR.

[12]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Texture Analysis , 2018, Handbook of Image Processing and Computer Vision.

[13]  Michel Verleysen,et al.  Nonlinear projection with curvilinear distances: Isomap versus curvilinear distance analysis , 2004, Neurocomputing.

[14]  L. Journaux,et al.  Plant leaf roughness analysis by texture classification with generalized Fourier descriptors in a dimensionality reduction context , 2011, Precision Agriculture.

[15]  G. R. Fulford,et al.  Process Driven Models for Spray Retention by Plants , 2006 .