Automated fat measurement and segmentation with intensity inhomogeneity correction

Adipose tissue (AT) content, especially visceral AT (VAT), is an important indicator for risks of many disorders, including heart disease and diabetes. Fat measurement by traditional means is often inaccurate and cannot separate subcutaneous and visceral fat. MRI offers a medium to obtain accurate measurements and segmentation between subcutaneous and visceral fat. We present an approach to automatically label the voxels associated with adipose tissue and segment them between subcutaneous and visceral. Our method uses non-parametric non-uniform intensity normalization (N3) to correct for image artifacts and inhomogeneities, fuzzy c-means to cluster AT regions and active contour models to separate SAT and VAT. Our algorithm has four stages: body masking, preprocessing, SAT and VAT separation, and tissue classification and quantification. The method was validated against a manual method performed by two observers, which used thresholds and manual contours to separate SAT and VAT. We measured 25 patients, 22 of which were included in the final analysis and the other three had too much artifact for automated processing. For SAT and total AT, differences between manual and automatic measurements were comparable to manual inter-observer differences. VAT measurements showed more variance in the automated method, likely due to inaccurate contours.

[1]  Chul Soon Choi,et al.  Comparison of low-dose CT and MR for measurement of intra-abdominal adipose tissue: a phantom and human study. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[2]  L. Lönn,et al.  Whole-body adipose tissue analysis: comparison of MRI, CT and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Luigi Landini,et al.  An accurate and robust method for unsupervised assessment of abdominal fat by MRI , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Laurent D. Cohen,et al.  Finite-Element Methods for Active Contour Models and Balloons for 2-D and 3-D Images , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  W H Hinson,et al.  Insulin resistance and fat patterning with aging: relationship to metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease. , 1998, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[6]  Christine Cavaro-Ménard,et al.  Fuzzy algorithms: Application to adipose tissue quantification on MR images , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[7]  P. Tothill,et al.  Measurement of abdominal fat by magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry in non-obese men and women , 1999, International Journal of Obesity.

[8]  J. Kullberg,et al.  Automated and reproducible segmentation of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue from abdominal MRI , 2007, International Journal of Obesity.

[9]  Ovidiu Ghita,et al.  Rapid automated measurement of body fat distribution from whole-body MRI. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Luigi Landini,et al.  Automatic correction of intensity inhomogeneities improves unsupervised assessment of abdominal fat by MRI , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  G. Bray,et al.  Contributions of total body fat, abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments, and visceral adipose tissue to the metabolic complications of obesity. , 2001, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[12]  R M Peshock,et al.  Estimation of adipose tissue mass by magnetic resonance imaging: validation against dissection in human cadavers. , 1994, Journal of lipid research.

[13]  Enzo Bonora,et al.  Measurement of abdominal fat with T1‐weighted MR images , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.