Underwater Acoustic Communication by a Single-Vector Sensor: Performance Comparison Using Three Different Algorithms

In November, 2014, the underwater acoustic (UWA) communication experiment by a single-vector sensor was conducted in shallow water environment. In this paper, three different algorithms are used to process the experimental data and their performance are compared in terms of equalized output signal to noise ratio (OSNR) and bit error rate (BER). The three algorithms are P-DFE, B-DFE, and T-DFE, respectively. P-DFE uses only the pressure channel of the vector sensor to realize the decision feedback equalizer (DFE). B-DFE linearly combines the pressure channel and velocity channel first and then uses DFE to equalize the combined signal. T-DFE adopts time reversal to combine all the channels of the vector sensor and then is followed by a single-channel DFE to remove residual intersymbol interference (ISI). According to the data processing results, both B-DFE and T-DFE can achieve better performance compared with P-DFE. This paper also finds that the performance of B-DFE depends on the beam pattern of the combined signal while the performance of T-DFE depends on the q function of the combined signal. Which algorithm should be used to process real data, B-DFE or T-DFE, depends on the degree of coherence between different channels of the vector sensor.

[1]  Hefeng Dong,et al.  Joint passive-phase conjugation with adaptive multichannel combining for coherent underwater acoustic communications , 2012 .

[2]  A.B. Baggeroer,et al.  The state of the art in underwater acoustic telemetry , 2000, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[3]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Acoustic vector-sensor correlations in ambient noise , 2001 .

[4]  Christopher D. Jones,et al.  Underwater acoustic communication by passive-phase conjugation: theory and experimental results , 2001 .

[5]  James C. Preisig,et al.  Performance Analysis and Optimal Design of Multichannel Equalizer for Underwater Acoustic Communications , 2015, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[6]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Acoustic vector-sensor array processing , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[7]  T. Yang,et al.  Correlation-based decision-feedback equalizer for underwater acoustic communications , 2005, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[8]  J. Proakis,et al.  Adaptive multichannel combining and equalization for underwater acoustic communications , 1993 .

[9]  Michael D. Zoltowski,et al.  Closed-form underwater acoustic direction-finding with arbitrarily spaced vector hydrophones at unknown locations , 1997 .

[10]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[11]  Aijun Song,et al.  Experimental Demonstration of Underwater Acoustic Communication by Vector Sensors , 2011, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[12]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Acoustic vector-sensor beamforming and Capon direction estimation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  J.A. Ritcey,et al.  Multichannel equalization by decision-directed passive phase conjugation: experimental results , 2004, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[14]  Qiao Gang Experimental study of OFDM underwater acoustic communication using a vector hydrophone , 2012 .

[15]  Ali Abdi,et al.  A new compact multichannel receiver for underwater wireless communication networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.