The hidden investments in information technology: The role of organisational context and system dependency

Management effectiveness is strongly influenced by the quality and availability of the information resource available to managers. This is partially dependent upon the information and communication technologies which transport events, data and knowledge from isolated consciousness to individual and collective awareness. However, the use of these technologies rarely occurs in isolation. Rather, it is embedded in a far wider organisational context which recognises the politics of decision making and technical change, and the broader culture and experiences of organisations. Central to this is understanding how information technology (IT) investments cause organisations to reflect on the importance of their processes of communication and the value they place on information. A key part of this organisational flux acknowledges that IT applications are built on the existing systems, structure and past experiences of the organisation. Accordingly, investments in IT form part of an ongoing organisational development. Such intangible aspects create a dilemma for management in that they prove problematic to evaluate using conventional approaches to cost justification. By drawing on a series of case studies, questionnaires and interviews, this paper suggests a fresh approach to this dilemma by developing the concepts of dependency, legacy and heritage. The paper concludes by recognising that current approaches to investment appraisal emphasise a narrow, short-term perspective which focuses on a single investment, rather than on a continuous investment stream.

[1]  Tony Gunton,et al.  Business Information Technology: End User Focus , 1988 .

[2]  Andrew Pettigrew The Influence Process between Specialists and Executives , 1974 .

[3]  Martyn Cordey-Hayes,et al.  Inward technology transfer as an interactive process , 1995 .

[4]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  MAKING PROMISES-THE KEY BENEFITS OF PROPOSED IS SYSTEMS , 1993 .

[5]  J. Kotter,et al.  Choosing strategies for change. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[6]  Veronica Symons,et al.  Evaluation of information systems: IS development in the Processing Company , 1990, J. Inf. Technol..

[7]  Paul Quintas,et al.  A product-process model of innovation in software development , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Y. Gupta Management information systems planning: analysis and techniques , 1989 .

[9]  Derek W. Bunn Multiple Perspectives for Decision-Making , 1985 .

[10]  J. Ward,et al.  Strategic Planning for Information Systems , 1990 .

[11]  Matthias Schumann Methods of Quantifying the Value of Office Automation , 1989 .

[12]  Martin Beirne,et al.  Information Technology and Workplace Democracy , 1992 .

[13]  Peter G. Sassone,et al.  Cost-justifying OA , 1986 .

[14]  Linda L. Price,et al.  An Agency Perspective on New Technology Champions , 1992 .

[15]  Marcus O'Connor,et al.  MIS success: why does it vary among users? , 1992, J. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Managing End-User Computing as a Value-Added Resource , 1988 .

[17]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[18]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, CONTROL AND POWER: THE CENTRALIZATION AND DECENTRALIZATION DEBATE REVISITED* , 1992 .

[19]  J. March,et al.  Handbook of organizations , 1966 .

[20]  David J. Silk Managing IS benefits for the 1990s , 1990, J. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Jon Clark,et al.  The Process of Technological Change: New Technology and Social Choice in the Workplace , 1989 .

[22]  R. Kling Computerization and Social Transformations , 1991 .