The response ratio hypothesis for magnitude estimation

Abstract Assume that each presentation of a signal produces two independent random variable representations and that the ratio of responses on successive trials of a magnitude estimation experiment are proportional to the ratio of a representation from the present trial, which representation is then lost, to the remaining one from the previous trial. The mean response to a particular signal depends on the mean of the representation used, but in general exhibits drift over trials and sequential effects due to the preceeding trial; the mean response ratio does not exhibit drift, but it has a simple form only when there are no sequential effects; however, a modified mean ratio function has a simple form. A model suggested by D. V. Cross is a special case of this one. Simple timing and counting models for the representations fail to exhibit sequential effects, contrary to considerable data. However, data of the authors have suggested a version of the timing model in which the sample size of the representation varies by an order of magnitude depending on how close the signal is to the preceding one; this hypothesis accounts for the observed sequential effects and other aspects of the data.

[1]  D. Cross,et al.  Sequential dependencies and regression in psychophysical judgments , 1973 .

[2]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Regression effect in psychophysical judgment , 1966 .

[3]  Garner Wr.  An informational analysis of absolute judgments of loudness. , 1953 .

[4]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Repeated magnitude estimations with a variable standard: Sequential effects and other properties , 1973 .

[5]  G. Lockhead,et al.  Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness , 1968 .

[6]  L M Ward,et al.  Category judgments of loudnesses in the absence of an experimenter-induced identification function: sequential effects and power-function fit. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  D M Green,et al.  A neural timing theory for response times and the psychophysics of intensity. , 1972, Psychological review.

[8]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  Sequential effects and memory in category judgments. , 1970 .

[9]  W. M. Siebert,et al.  Frequency discrimination in the auditory system: Place or periodicity mechanisms? , 1970 .

[10]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[11]  David M. Greem,et al.  Variability of magnitude estimates: A timing theory analysis , 1974 .

[12]  A. Comrey.  A proposed method for absolute ratio scaling , 1950, Psychometrika.

[13]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  Response system processes in absolute judgment , 1971 .

[14]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[15]  L. Sjöberg.  THREE MODELS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SUBJECTIVE RATIOS , 1971 .

[16]  Gösta Ekman,et al.  Two Generalized Ratio Scaling Methods , 1958 .