Uterine artery embolization in association with methotrexate infusion for the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy

Objective To investigate the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of uterine artery embolization in association with methotrexate (MTX) infusion for the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy. Methods Fifty-one patients with tubal ectopic pregnancy were referred for interventional management. All patients received super-selective arteriography of the uterine artery, were infused with 50–100 mg methotrexate (MTX) through a catheter, and underwent embolization of the uterine artery with a gel-foam pledge. Clinical presentation, findings of physical examination, β-HCG values, and the size of the ectopic mass were documented for comparison. The concentration of MTX in blood was evaluated at 0.5, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after the procedure. Results Forty-seven out of the 51 patients had clinical resolution of their tubal pregnancy (92.2%). The average time for the β-HCG value to decrease and come back to normal was 9.16 ± 2.54 days (mean +/− SD). MTX levels in peripheral blood could not be detected for patients who received 50 or 75 mg MTX at 36 hours after the procedure, while the MTX level was 0.01 μmol/L at 48 hours after the procedure for patients who received 100 mg. Out of the 4 cases whose ectopic mass size was ≥5 cm, 3 failed to respond to the treatment; however, those whose ectopic mass size was ≤5 cm responded positively to the treatment, regardless of the β-HCG concentration and abdominal bleeding, except for 1 patient who had to undergo laparoscopy for severe abdominal pain and who showed a reduction in her β-HCG level. Conclusion Uterine artery embolization in association with methotrexate infusion is safe and effective in the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy, especially for those women with mild to moderate bleeding, or for those at risk of a major hemorrhage. The selection criterion of mass size >5 cm should, therefore, be carefully considered.

[1]  P. Crochet,et al.  The effectiveness of different treatments for caesarean ectopic pregnancy , 2018, BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[2]  J. Mackay,et al.  Successful Management of Cervical Ectopic Pregnancy with Bilateral Uterine Artery Embolization and Methotrexate , 2018, Case reports in emergency medicine.

[3]  P. Sinha,et al.  Ectopic pregnancy: Review of 80 cases. , 2017, Medical journal, Armed Forces India.

[4]  N. Sebire,et al.  Diagnosis and management of intramural ectopic pregnancy , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  O. B. Anozie,et al.  Ectopic pregnancy: a life-threatening gynecological emergency , 2013, International journal of women's health.

[6]  L. Mettler,et al.  Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy , 2013, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[7]  T. Tulandi,et al.  A pragmatic and evidence-based management of ectopic pregnancy. , 2013, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[8]  M. Diamond,et al.  Conservative management of cervical ectopic pregnancy: utility of uterine artery embolization. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  H. Honda,et al.  Uterine artery embolization along with the administration of methotrexate for cervical ectopic pregnancy: technical and clinical outcomes. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  J. Reekers,et al.  Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 10-year outcomes from the randomized EMMY trial. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  M. Candiani,et al.  Human chorionic gonadotropin level as a predictor of trophoblastic infiltration into the tubal wall in ectopic pregnancy: a blinded study. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  H. Kiss,et al.  Proliferative cell activity in correlation to human chorionic gonadotrophin release of trophoblast tissue of tubal pregnancy. , 1997, Human reproduction.