Expectancy modulates a late positive ERP in an artificial grammar task

A wide range of studies have found late positive ERP components in response to anomalies during processing of structured sequences. In language studies, this component is named Syntactic Positive Shift (SPS) or P600. It is characterized by an increase in potential peaking around 600 ms after the appearance of the syntactic anomaly and has a centroparietal topography. Similar late positive components were found more recently in non-linguistic contexts. These results have led to the hypothesis that these components index the detection of anomalies in rule-governed sequences, or the access to abstract rule representations, regardless of the nature of the stimuli. Additionally, there is evidence showing that the SPS/P600 is sensitive to probability manipulations, which affect the subjects' expectancy of the stimuli. Our aim in the present work was to address the hypothesis that the late positive component is modulated by the subject's expectancy of the stimuli. To do so, we employed an artificial grammar learning task, and controlled the frequency of presentation to different kind of sequences during training. Results showed that certain sequence types elicited a late positive component which was modulated by different factors in two distinct time windows. In an earlier window, the component was higher for sequences which had a low or null probability of occurrence during training, while in a later window, the component was higher for incorrect than correct sequences. Furthermore, this late window effect was absent in those subjects whose performance was not significantly above chance. Two possible explanations for this effect are suggested.

[1]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  F Rösler,et al.  Processing of incongruous mental calculation problems: evidence for an arithmetic N400 effect. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[3]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Processing Syntactic Relations in Language and Music: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  Definition, Identification, and Reliability of Measurement of the P300 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential , 1987 .

[6]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  R. Haase Classical and Partial Eta Square in Multifactor ANOVA Designs , 1983 .

[8]  Sönke Johannes,et al.  Human brain potentials to reading syntactic errors in sentences of different complexity , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  Jacob Cohen Measurement Educational and Psychological Educational and Psychological Measurement Eta-squared and Partial Eta-squared in Fixed Factor Anova Designs Educational and Psychological Measurement Additional Services and Information For , 2022 .

[10]  H. J. Eysenck,et al.  Advances in psychophysiology: J.R. Jennings, P.K. Ackles & M.G.H. Coles (Eds) Vol.5 (1993).320 pp. £42.50 (hardback). ISBN 185302 191 1 , 1994 .

[11]  A. Friederici,et al.  Syntactic Gender and Semantic Expectancy: ERPs Reveal Early Autonomy and Late Interaction , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  F. Macar,et al.  An event-related potential analysis of incongruity in music and other non-linguistic contexts. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[13]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[15]  M. Besson,et al.  AN EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL (ERP) STUDY OF MUSICAL EXPECTANCY : COMPARISON OF MUSICIANS WITH NONMUSICIANS , 1995 .

[16]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  A. Friederici The Time Course of Syntactic Activation During Language Processing: A Model Based on Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Data , 1995, Brain and Language.

[18]  J. Polich Updating P 300 : An Integrative Theory of P 3 a and P 3 b , 2009 .

[19]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[20]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The linguistic processes underlying the P600 , 2010 .

[21]  Jutta L. Mueller,et al.  Morphological Processing in a Second Language: Behavioral and Event-related Brain Potential Evidence for Storage and Decomposition , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  Kim Ainsworth-Darnell,et al.  Dissociating Brain Responses to Syntactic and Semantic Anomalies: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials , 1998 .

[24]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[25]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Morphological analysis in sentence processing: An ERP study , 2003 .

[26]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.

[27]  G. Mulder,et al.  When syntax meets semantics. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Hierarchical and Linear Sequence Processing: An Electrophysiological Exploration of Two Different Grammar Types , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  A. Friederici,et al.  Syntactic learning by mere exposure - An ERP study in adult learners , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[30]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The impact of semantic-free second-language training on ERPs during case processing , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  C. Phillips,et al.  The role of feature-number and feature-type in processing Hindi verb agreement violations , 2007, Brain Research.

[32]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[33]  A. Friederici,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE: Dissociable ERP profiles for processing rules vs instances in a cognitive sequencing task , 2000 .

[35]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Human brain potentials reveal similar processing of non-linguistic abstract structure and linguistic syntactic structure , 2002, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  M. I. Núñez-Peña,et al.  P600 related to rule violation in an arithmetic task. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[37]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  The P300 component of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing , 1982, Biological Psychology.