How Big Data Affect Urban Low-Carbon Transformation—A Quasi-Natural Experiment from China

As a new factor of production, data play a key role in driving low-carbon and sustainable development relying on the digital economy. However, previous studies have ignored this point. Based on the panel data of 283 cities in China from 2007 to 2019, we investigated the construction of national big data comprehensive pilot zones (NBDCPZs) in China as a quasi-natural experiment, using the difference-in-differences (DID) model to empirically test the impact of NBDCPZ policies on urban low-carbon transformation. The following conclusions can be drawn: NBDCPZ construction significantly promotes urban low-carbon transformation, and a series of robustness analysis supports this conclusion. NBDCPZ constructions mainly promotes urban low-carbon transformation by stimulating urban green innovation and optimizing the allocation of urban resource elements. Compared with eastern cities, small and medium-sized cities, and resource-based cities, the construction of NBDCPZs can promote the low-carbon transformation of cities in central and western China, large cities, and non-resource-based cities. Further analysis shows that the construction of NBDCPZs can only improve the low-carbon transformation of local cities, with negative spatial spillover effects on the low-carbon transformation of surrounding cities. Therefore, in the future, it is vital to consider the promotion effect of the construction of NBDCPZs on the low-carbon transformation of local cities and prevent its negative impact on the low-carbon transformation of surrounding cities.

[1]  Xiaoguang Xu,et al.  Does internet infrastructure improve or reduce carbon emission performance? -A dual perspective based on local government intervention and market segmentation , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[2]  N. Xu,et al.  Innovation-Driven Development and Urban Land Low-Carbon Use Efficiency: A Policy Assessment from China , 2022, Land.

[3]  Zhichuan Zhu,et al.  Has the Digital Economy Reduced Carbon Emissions?: Analysis Based on Panel Data of 278 Cities in China , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[4]  Shan He,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Agricultural Carbon Emission Performance in China , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[5]  M. Kartal,et al.  The impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on carbon emission intensity in China: Fresh evidence from novel dynamic ARDL simulations. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Zheng Ji,et al.  Do Artificial Intelligence Applications Affect Carbon Emission Performance?—Evidence from Panel Data Analysis of Chinese Cities , 2022, Energies.

[7]  Jiayang Kong,et al.  The Effect of Innovation City Construction on Carbon Emissions in China , 2022, Land.

[8]  Mingqi Li,et al.  Does the construction of innovative cities promote urban green innovation? , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  Yuting Zhu,et al.  Carbon emission efficiency network formation mechanism and spatial correlation complexity analysis: Taking the Yangtze River Economic Belt as an example. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Digital economy and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China's city level , 2022, Energy Policy.

[11]  Danni Ma,et al.  Innovation in emerging economies: Research on the digital economy driving high-quality green development , 2022, Journal of Business Research.

[12]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Does the development of China's high-speed rail improve the total-factor carbon productivity of cities? , 2022, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[13]  Guochang Fang,et al.  What drives urban carbon emission efficiency? – Spatial analysis based on nighttime light data , 2022, Applied Energy.

[14]  Xiumei Sun,et al.  Digital Economy Development and Urban Green Innovation CA-Pability: Based on Panel Data of 274 Prefecture-Level Cities in China , 2022, Sustainability.

[15]  R. Feng,et al.  Does trade in services improve carbon efficiency? —Analysis based on international panel data , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[16]  Y. Hao,et al.  How does internet development affect energy-saving and emission reduction? Evidence from China , 2021, Energy Economics.

[17]  Y. Hao,et al.  What is the role of telecommunications infrastructure construction in green technology innovation? A firm-level analysis for China , 2021, Energy Economics.

[18]  Cheng-bo Zhao,et al.  Haze Pollution Levels, Spatial Spillover Influence, and Impacts of the Digital Economy: Empirical Evidence from China , 2021, Sustainability.

[19]  Lei Wang,et al.  Will researching digital technology really empower green development? , 2021, Technology in Society.

[20]  Qiu Zixun,et al.  Development of Digital Economy and Regional Total Factor Productivity: An Analysis Based on National Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Zone , 2021 .

[21]  Shuai Shao,et al.  Heterogeneous green innovations and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China's city level , 2021, Energy Economics.

[22]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Low-carbon city pilot and carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China , 2021 .

[23]  Laura L. Veldkamp,et al.  A Growth Model of the Data Economy , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[24]  Lei Shen,et al.  Spatial effect of informatization on China’s energy intensity：Based on spatial Durbin error model , 2021, 资源科学.

[25]  Guoxing Zhang,et al.  Carbon emission performance in logistics in the Yellow River basin , 2021 .

[26]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Does the Internet development affect energy and carbon emission performance , 2021 .

[27]  Haitao Wu,et al.  Does the Development of the Internet Contribute to Air Pollution Control in China? Mechanism Discussion and Empirical Test , 2020, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.

[28]  Yingdong Wang,et al.  Spatial effects of carbon emission intensity and regional development in China , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[29]  Wei Sun,et al.  How does urbanization affect carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from China , 2020 .

[30]  R. Molarius,et al.  Open government data policy and value added - Evidence on transport safety agency case , 2020, Technology in Society.

[31]  Christopher Tonetti,et al.  Nonrivalry and the Economics of Data , 2019, American Economic Review.

[32]  Maryam Ghasemaghaei,et al.  Assessing the impact of big data on firm innovation performance: Big data is not always better data , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[33]  Jinhua Cheng,et al.  Can low-carbon city construction facilitate green growth? Evidence from China's pilot low-carbon city initiative , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[34]  B. Lahouel,et al.  ICT, total factor productivity, and carbon dioxide emissions in Tunisia , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[35]  Huiming Zhang,et al.  Total-factor carbon emission efficiency of China's provincial industrial sector and its dynamic evolution , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[36]  Dequn Zhou,et al.  Measuring China’s regional energy and carbon emission efficiency with DEA models: A survey , 2016 .

[37]  Chu Wei,et al.  Economic development and carbon dioxide emissions in China: Provincial panel data analysis , 2012 .

[38]  M. D. Ugarte,et al.  Introduction to Spatial Econometrics , 2011 .

[39]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA - A third pole of technical efficiency , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Ross Levine,et al.  Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States , 2009 .

[41]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  The Greenness of Cities: Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Urban Development , 2008 .

[42]  J. LeSage,et al.  Spatial Econometric Modeling of Origin-Destination Flows , 2008 .

[43]  L. Anselin,et al.  Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models , 1988 .

[44]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.