State and federal compliance with the Synar Amendment: federal fiscal year 1998.

BACKGROUND The Synar Amendment requires states and territories to enact a law prohibiting the sale of tobacco to minors and to enforce that law in a manner that could reasonably be expected to decrease the availability of tobacco to minors. OBJECTIVE To determine if the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and applicant states and territories are complying with the Synar Amendment. DATA SOURCES Block grant applications from 59 states and territories describing activities during the federal fiscal year 1998. MEASURES Whether applicants had enacted a tobacco sales law without loopholes, conducted enforcement inspections, penalized violators, and conducted a valid statewide survey with violation rates below the permissible threshold, and whether DHHS actions were consistent with the statutory requirements of the Synar Amendment. RESULTS Three applicants had laws containing loopholes, 6 failed to conduct enforcement inspections, 7 failed to prosecute violators, 2 failed to conduct a valid survey, and 10 failed to demonstrate compliance with violation rate goals. Fifteen applicants failed 1 or more criteria and 8 were ultimately penalized by DHHS. No measurable progress in reducing violation rates was reported by 30 states, with 16 reporting an increase during the previous year. Twenty-four applicants were granted delays. CONCLUSIONS States that demonstrated remarkable progress were balanced by states with worsening performance; as a whole there was no significant national progress toward reducing the availability of tobacco to youths. This failure can be attributed to inadequate resources devoted to enforcement and reliance on merchant education in lieu of bona fide law enforcement.

[1]  J. Difranza State and federal compliance with the Synar amendment: federal fiscal year 1997. , 2000, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[2]  R. Iachan,et al.  Factors associated with tobacco sales to minors: lessons learned from the FDA compliance checks. , 2000, JAMA.

[3]  J. Difranza Youth access: the baby and the bath water , 2000, Tobacco control.

[4]  J. Difranza Are the federal and state governments complying with the Synar Amendment? , 1999, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[5]  J. Difranza,et al.  State and federal revenues from tobacco consumed by minors. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[6]  A C Wagenaar,et al.  The effects of community policies to reduce youth access to tobacco. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[7]  M. Schofield,et al.  Interventions with retailers to reduce cigarette sales to minors: a randomised controlled trial , 1977, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[8]  J. Difranza,et al.  Youth access to tobacco: the effects of age, gender, vending machine locks, and "it's the law" programs. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[9]  Kathleen Franklin,et al.  THE FINAL RULE , 1995 .

[10]  S. Chapman,et al.  Effects of publicity and a warning letter on illegal cigarette sales to minors. , 2010, Australian journal of public health.

[11]  T. Abernathy Compliance for Kids: a community-based tobacco prevention project. , 1994, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[12]  S. Woodruff,et al.  Effect of a retailer intervention on cigarette sales to minors in San Diego County, California , 1993 .

[13]  J. Difranza,et al.  The Tobacco Institute's "It's the Law" campaign: has it halted illegal sales of tobacco to children? , 1992, American journal of public health.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  Sustained effects of an educational program to reduce sales of cigarettes to minors. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[15]  K. Cummings,et al.  An intervention to reduce the sale of cigarettes to minors. , 1990, New York state journal of medicine.

[16]  D. Altman,et al.  Reducing the illegal sale of cigarettes to minors. , 1989, JAMA.