Thingiverse: review and analysis of available files

This paper aims to present an overviewof the Thingiverse digital model repository and provides an analysis of a subset of randomly selected models of this site. To carry out this study, literature research was conducted to identify relevant works. Based on existing research, a subset of available models is acquired and analysed utilising existing open source software. Focusing on the geometrical details of the acquired models, an analysis is performed. Furthermore, statistical data such as download, view counters, and utilised licences of these models, is collected. For the literature review on this platform, 25 existing works were identified. From the 10,000 randomly selected ThingIDs, 3528 were existent and were acquired. Most metrics calculated are dominated by less than 20% of all the analysed models. Online repositories are a source for user-generated digital models. This paper suggests that the licence of choice is a creative commons – attribution – share alike licence.

[1]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Networks of Innovation in 3D Printing , 2013, ArXiv.

[2]  Olivier Barais,et al.  Customization and 3D printing: a challenging playground for software product lines , 2014, SPLC.

[3]  Alec Jacobson,et al.  Thingi10K: A Dataset of 10, 000 3D-Printing Models , 2016, ArXiv.

[4]  Angela Daly,et al.  Cultures of Sharing in 3D Printing: What Can We Learn from the Licence Choices of Thingiverse Users? , 2014 .

[5]  F. Giannini,et al.  Mapping aesthetic properties to 3D free form shapes through the use of a machine learning based framework , 2016 .

[6]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Collective Innovation in Open Source Hardware , 2014, ArXiv.

[7]  Thierry Rayna,et al.  A Taxonomy of Online 3D Printing Platforms , 2016 .

[8]  George Kuk,et al.  The complementarity of openness: How MakerBot leveraged Thingiverse in 3D printing , 2016 .

[9]  Kate Sellen,et al.  Exploring Downloadable Assistive Technologies Through the Co-fabrication of a 3D Printed Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Dog Wheelchair , 2016, HCI.

[10]  Spiros Papadimitriou,et al.  Towards laws of the 3d-printable design web , 2014, WebSci '14.

[11]  Hui Xiong,et al.  Remix in 3D Printing: What your Sources say About You , 2015, WWW.

[12]  Guha Manogharan,et al.  Making sense of 3-D printing: Creating a map of additive manufacturing products and services , 2014 .

[13]  Jie-Eun Hwang,et al.  How to Measure Quality of Affordable 3D Printing: Cultivating Quantitative Index in the User Community , 2016, HCI.

[14]  Lynn R. Kahle,et al.  The Empowered Customer: User-Generated Content and the Future of Marketing , 2013 .

[15]  C. S. Porter,et al.  Product personalisation using personally meaningful data and the creation of new product attributes , 2017 .

[16]  Amy Hurst,et al.  Sharing is Caring: Assistive Technology Designs on Thingiverse , 2015, CHI.

[17]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Patterns of Physical Design Remixing in Online Maker Communities , 2015, CHI.

[18]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson.  Collective Design: Remixing and Visibility , 2014 .

[19]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Idea Inheritance, Originality, and Collective Innovation , 2013, ArXiv.

[20]  Michael Groenendyk.  Cataloging the 3D web: the availability of educational 3D models on the internet , 2016, Libr. Hi Tech.

[21]  John Darlington,et al.  Open Innovation, Co-Creation and Mass Customisation: What Role for 3D Printing Platforms? , 2014 .

[22]  Nathaniel Hudson,et al.  Barriers to Using, Customizing, and Printing 3D Designs on Thingiverse , 2016, GROUP.

[23]  Jason Griffey.  Absolutely Fab-Ulous , 2012 .

[24]  Melissa Mallon.  Maker Mania , 2014 .

[25]  Miguel Fernandez-Vicente,et al.  Identifying limitations for design for manufacturing with desktop FFF 3D printers , 2015 .

[26]  Emily J. Hurst,et al.  3D Printing in Healthcare: Emerging Applications , 2016 .