To use or not to use? an ethical analysis of access to data and samples of a deceased patient for genetic diagnostic and research purposes

Using genetic tests on deceased patients’ samples for diagnostic purposes affects the family members' health and lives but raises some ethical issues in today’s practice of medicine and research. In this paper, we address a common ethical dilemma of clinicians regarding whether to perform genetic tests on a deceased patient’s sample upon a request from first-degree relatives against the patient's wishes in the last days of life. In this paper, a real case scenario is presented that echoes the above-mentioned ethical challenge. Reviewing the genetic basis of the case, the ethical arguments for and against the reuse of genetic material in a clinical context are discussed. An ethico-legal analysis of the case is proposed based on Islamic medical ethics resources. As reusing stored samples of expired patients without their consent also challenges the researchers in the field of genetics, a debate is included on the post-mortem use of genetic data and samples for research. Finally, defining the special features of the presented case and positive benefit-risk ratio, it is concluded that reusing the patient's sample may be justified if the first-degree family members insist on genetic testing and are comprehensively informed about the benefits and harms.

[1]  D. R. Gordon,et al.  “If relatives inherited the gene, they should inherit the data.” Bringing the family into the room where bioethics happens , 2021, New genetics and society.

[2]  E. Frixione,et al.  Genetic/genomic testing: defining the parameters for ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI) , 2021, BMC medical ethics.

[3]  S. Duan,et al.  Somatically acquired mutations in primary myelofibrosis: A case report and meta-analysis. , 2021, Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.

[4]  A. Lucassen,et al.  From Beyond the Grave: Use of Medical Information from the Deceased to Guide Care of Living Relatives , 2020, Current Genetic Medicine Reports.

[5]  E. Idani,et al.  Developing "Code of Ethics for Medical Professionals, Medical Council of Islamic Republic of Iran". , 2020, Archives of Iranian medicine.

[6]  J. Pugh,et al.  Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics , 2020 .

[7]  C. Patch,et al.  ESHG PPPC Comments on postmortem use of genetic data for research purposes , 2019, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[8]  M. C. Ploem,et al.  Stakeholders’ perspectives on the post-mortem use of genetic and health-related data for research: a systematic review , 2019, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[9]  M. Fay,et al.  Familial genetic risks: how can we better navigate patient confidentiality and appropriate risk disclosure to relatives? , 2019, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[10]  E. Clayton,et al.  The law of genetic privacy: applications, implications, and limitations , 2019, Journal of law and the biosciences.

[11]  G. Petersen,et al.  Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences , 2018, AJOB empirical bioethics.

[12]  G. Petersen,et al.  Attitudes Toward Return of Genetic Research Results to Relatives, Including After Death: Comparison of Cancer Probands, Blood Relatives, and Spouse/Partners , 2018, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[13]  M. Rothstein Reconsidering the duty to warn genetically at-risk relatives , 2018, Genetics in Medicine.

[14]  B. Prainsack,et al.  Beyond individualism: Is there a place for relational autonomy in clinical practice and research? , 2017, Clinical ethics.

[15]  Elaheh Saghi,et al.  A Review of Legal Vacuums in the Issue of Transplanting Organs Taken from Brain Dead Patients , 2017 .

[16]  A. Emadi,et al.  Molecular Pathogenesis and Clinical Significance of Driver Mutations in Primary Myelofibrosis: A Review , 2016, Medical Principles and Practice.

[17]  J. V. van Delden,et al.  Postmortem disclosure of genetic information to family members: active or passive? , 2015, Trends in molecular medicine.

[18]  Lainie Friedman Ross,et al.  Relational Autonomy: Moving Beyond the Limits of Isolated Individualism , 2014, Pediatrics.

[19]  J. McLaughlin,et al.  Questions of kinship and inheritance in pediatric genetics: substance and responsibility , 2011 .

[20]  A. Tassé Biobanking and deceased persons , 2011, Human Genetics.

[21]  F. Passamonti,et al.  DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  C. Rehmann-Sutter,et al.  Disclosure Dilemmas: Ethics of Genetic Prognosis after the 'Right to Know/Not to Know' Debate , 2009 .

[23]  A. Ho Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family's role in medical decision-making. , 2008, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[24]  M. Konrad Narrating the New Predictive Genetics: Ethics, Ethnography and Science , 2005 .

[25]  Wolzt,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[26]  A. Mohammad,et al.  Place the patient in medical decisions , 2014 .

[27]  A. Sachedina Islamic biomedical ethics : principles and application , 2009 .