On the perceived usefulness of risk descriptions for decision-making in disaster risk management

Managing risk using an “all-hazards” and “whole of society”-approach involves extensive communication of risk descriptions among many stakeholders. In the present study we investigate how professionals working with disaster risk management in such contexts perceive the usefulness of different descriptions of risk. Empirical data from the Swedish disaster risk management system were used in an attempt to investigate the aspects of a risk description that affect its usefulness (as perceived by professionals). Thirty-three local municipal risk and vulnerability assessments (RVA documents) produced in the region of Scania in 2012 were analyzed in terms of six variables. The documents were then ranked by professionals based on their perceived usefulness for decision-making. Statistical analysis was conducted to identify any possible correlations between the overall ranking of the usefulness of the municipal RVA:s and each of the variables. We conclude that the way the likelihood and consequences of scenarios are described influence the perceived usefulness of a risk description. Furthermore, whether descriptions of scenarios are included in a risk description or not, and whether background information concerning the likelihood of scenarios are included also influence perceived usefulness of risk descriptions. (Less)

[1]  Henry H. Willis.  Guiding Resource Allocations Based on Terrorism Risk , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  T. Aven,et al.  On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain , 2009 .

[3]  Louis Anthony Cox,et al.  Confronting Deep Uncertainties in Risk Analysis , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Jonathan I Levy,et al.  Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Robert Goble,et al.  Risk Assessment Can Be a Game‐Changing Information Technology—But Too Often It Isn't , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2009, Psychological science.

[7]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling , 2000 .

[8]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Henrik Tehler,et al.  Designing societal safety: A study of the Swedish crisis management system , 2012 .

[10]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  A Failure to Communicate: 9/11 and the Tragedy of the Informational Commons , 2005 .

[11]  M. V. Eeten,et al.  Systems that Should Have Failed: Critical Infrastructure Protection in an Institutionally Fragmented Environment , 2007 .

[12]  Terje Aven,et al.  On how to define, understand and describe risk , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Bjørn Ivar Kruke,et al.  Societal Safety: Concept, Borders and Dilemmas , 2007 .

[14]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[15]  D. Weiss,et al.  Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments , 1975 .

[16]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the link between risk and exposure , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. , 1945 .

[18]  Kimberly M. Thompson,et al.  Communication of risk assessment information to risk managers , 2000 .

[19]  Henrik Hassel,et al.  Approaches and challenges for Swedish public agencies in the performance of Risk and Vulnerability Analyses , 2012 .

[20]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Evaluating deep uncertainties in strategic priority‐setting with an application to facility energy investments , 2012, Syst. Eng..

[21]  K. Krippendorff.  Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations , 2004 .

[22]  Terje Aven,et al.  Selective critique of risk assessments with recommendations for improving methodology and practise , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Petter Grytten Almklov,et al.  The Commoditization of Societal Safety , 2010 .

[24]  Yacov Y Haimes,et al.  On the Complex Definition of Risk: A Systems‐Based Approach , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  T. Aven,et al.  How to define and interpret a probability in a risk and safety setting , 2013 .

[26]  John Hood.  Emerging Risks in the 21st Century: An Agenda for Action , 2005 .

[27]  S. Cutter,et al.  Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Disaster Resilience Indicators for Benchmarking Baseline Conditions , 2011 .

[28]  Thomas D. Gautheir.  Detecting Trends Using Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient , 2001 .

[29]  Rafaela Hillerbrand,et al.  Handbook of risk theory : epistemology, decision theory, ethics, and social implications of risk , 2012 .

[30]  Alexander Cedergren,et al.  Studying risk governance using a design perspective , 2014 .

[31]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. , 1945 .

[32]  V. M. Bier,et al.  On the state of the art: risk communication to decision-makers , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[33]  Sharon L Caudle,et al.  A New Generation of National Security Strategies: Early Findings from the Netherlands and the United Kingdom , 2010 .

[34]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[35]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the ontological status of the concept of risk , 2011 .

[36]  S S Stevens,et al.  On the Theory of Scales of Measurement. , 1946, Science.

[37]  T. Kean,et al.  The 9/11 Commission Report , 2008 .

[38]  B.J.M Ale,et al.  Risk assessment practices in The Netherlands , 2002 .

[39]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk communication in the light of different risk perspectives , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[40]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[41]  W. Fisher,et al.  Narrative rationality and the logic of scientific discourse , 1994 .

[42]  Terje Aven,et al.  On How to Deal with Deep Uncertainties in a Risk Assessment and Management Context , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[43]  E. Gaygısız,et al.  The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) , 2022 .

[44]  Regeringen och Regeringskansliet.  Krishantering och civilt försvar i kommuner och landsting , 2005 .

[45]  Henrik Hassel,et al.  On common terms with shared risks – Studying the communication of risk between local, regional and national authorities in Sweden , 2015 .

[46]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  Foundations and choice of risk metrics , 2014 .

[47]  Ruth Beyth-Marom,et al.  How probable is probable? A numerical translation of verbal probability expressions , 1982 .

[48]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Developing Design Propositions through Research Synthesis , 2008 .

[49]  Henrik Tehler,et al.  Evaluating risk and vulnerability assessments: a study of the regional level in Sweden , 2013 .

[50]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[51]  J. Schreiber.  Foundations Of Statistics , 2016 .

[52]  D. Budescu,et al.  Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases , 1985 .

[53]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Four questions for risk communication: a response to Roger Kasperson , 2014 .