Care Delivery, Quality Measurement, and Quality Improvement in Nursing Homes: Issues and Recommendations from the National Academies' Report on the Quality of Care in Nursing Homes

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) Committee on the Quality of Care in Nursing Homes had a broad mandate: to examine how the United States “delivers, finances, measures, and regulates the quality of nursing home care” (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2022, p. xvii). The resultant goals and associated recommendations encompass a broad array of strategies and actors needed to improve the quality of care. At their core are a vision and guiding principles that, if enacted, the Committee asserts will transform the day-to-day delivery of care: “nursing home residents receive care in a safe environment that honors their values and preferences, addresses goals of care, promotes equity, and assesses benefits and risks of care and treatments” (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2022, p. 498i). Care delivery must be person centered: that is, care that meets the unique needs, goals, values, and preferences of residents. Despite the long-standing expectation that the care provided to nursing home residents is holistic and focused on individual needs and preferences, the Committee found that, even prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) pandemic, the quality of care in nursing homes was neither consistently comprehensive nor of high quality. Furthermore, the regulations that have been in place for 35 years have not been fully enforced. Failures in care delivery involve many aspects of care and have myriad causes. Some of these causes include inadequately prepared and compensated staff, high administrative and staff turnovers, a lack of health information technology to support care coordination, the complex psychosocial and medical needs of residents, and regulations that incentivize care that is not aligned with patients' or residents' goals and preferences. Based on these findings, the Committee articulated seven overarching goals to improve the quality of nursing home care. This paper focuses on selected issues in care delivery, quality measurement, and quality improvement. We provide an overview of the goals and recommendations associated with these three areas. Then, we then suggest action steps for those working to improve and provide care and services to nursing home residents or other services to the nursing home industry. We conclude with implications for gerontological leaders, clinicians, and policy-makers. Received: 26 January 2023 Accepted: 26 January 2023

[1]  J. Hanlon,et al.  Effect of Deintensifying Diabetes Medications on Negative Events in Older Veteran Nursing Home Residents , 2022, Diabetes care.

[2]  Engineering Medicine National Academies of Sciences The National Imperative to Improve Nursing Home Quality , 2022 .

[3]  Brian T. Maurer Care in the time of COVID. , 2021, JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants.

[4]  D. Gifford,et al.  Nursing home leaders’ perceptions of a research partnership , 2021, Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.

[5]  M. Ersek,et al.  End-Of-Life Care in the Time of COVID-19: Communication Matters More Than Ever , 2021, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.

[6]  J. Kirchner,et al.  Implementation science: What is it and why should I care? , 2020, Psychiatry Research.

[7]  P. Bartels,et al.  Can quality improvement improve the quality of care? A systematic review of reported effects and methodological rigor in plan-do-study-act projects , 2019, BMC Health Services Research.

[8]  Andrew Lazris,et al.  Geriatric Palliative Care. , 2019, Primary care.

[9]  N. Herrmann,et al.  Challenges of conducting research in long-term care facilities: a systematic review , 2018, BMC Geriatrics.

[10]  K. Van Haitsma,et al.  Negotiating Risky Preferences in Nursing Homes: A Case Study of the Rothschild Person-Centered Care Planning Approach. , 2018, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[11]  M. Calkins,et al.  Honoring Individual Choice in Long-Term Residential Communities When It Involves Risk: A Person-Centered Approach. , 2016, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[12]  J. Dibert,et al.  Ohio Nursing Home and Residential Care Facility Satisfaction: Survey Development and Testing for Residents and Families , 2016 .

[13]  J. Banaszak-Holl,et al.  Do Nursing Home Chain Size and Proprietary Status Affect Experiences With Care? , 2016, Medical care.

[14]  Edward J. Miech,et al.  Communication and effectiveness in a US nursing home quality-improvement collaborative. , 2014, Nursing & health sciences.

[15]  Y. Shaw-Taylor Making quality improvement programs more effective. , 2014, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[16]  M. Ersek,et al.  Geriatric palliative care in long-term care settings with a focus on nursing homes. , 2013, Journal of palliative medicine.

[17]  D. Grabowski,et al.  Minnesota's provider-initiated approach yields care quality gains at participating nursing homes. , 2013, Health affairs.

[18]  D. Mehr,et al.  The influence of teams to sustain quality improvement in nursing homes that "need improvement". , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[19]  Serena Koh Siew Lin,et al.  The effectiveness of physical restraints in reducing falls among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes: a systematic review , 2012, JBI library of systematic reviews.

[20]  Mary Jane Koren,et al.  Person-centered care for nursing home residents: the culture-change movement. , 2010, Health affairs.

[21]  M. Rantz,et al.  Helping nursing homes "at risk" for quality problems: a statewide evaluation. , 2009, Geriatric nursing.

[22]  D. Mehr,et al.  Statewide strategy to improve quality of care in nursing facilities. , 2003, The Gerontologist.