Microfluidic chemostat for measuring single cell dynamics in bacteria.

We designed a microfluidic chemostat consisting of 600 sub-micron trapping/growth channels connected to two feeding channels. The microchemostat traps E. coli cells and forces them to grow in lines for over 50 generations. Excess cells, including the mother cells captured at the start of the process, are removed from both ends of the growth channels by the media flow. With the aid of time-lapse microscopy, we have monitored dynamic properties such as growth rate and GFP expression at the single-cell level for many generations while maintaining a population of bacteria of similar age. We also use the microchemostat to show how the population responds to dynamic changes in the environment. Since more than 100 individual bacterial cells are aligned and immobilized in a single field of view, the microchemostat is an ideal platform for high-throughput intracellular measurements. We demonstrate this capability by tracking with sub-diffraction resolution the movements of fluorescently tagged loci in more than one thousand cells on a single device. The device yields results comparable to conventional agar microscopy experiments with substantial increases in throughput and ease of analysis.

[1]  O. Espéli,et al.  DNA dynamics vary according to macrodomain topography in the E. coli chromosome , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[2]  T. Hwa,et al.  Growth Rate-Dependent Global Effects on Gene Expression in Bacteria , 2009, Cell.

[3]  Mark N. Joswiak,et al.  Plasma thinned nanopost arrays for DNA electrophoresis , 2011 .

[4]  N. Allbritton,et al.  Micro total analysis systems for cell biology and biochemical assays. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  M. Burns,et al.  Microdroplet-Enabled Highly Parallel Co-Cultivation of Microbial Communities , 2011, PloS one.

[6]  J. Theriot,et al.  Chromosomal Loci Move Subdiffusively through a Viscoelastic Cytoplasm , 2010 .

[7]  Wolfgang Wiechert,et al.  A disposable picolitre bioreactor for cultivation and investigation of industrially relevant bacteria on the single cell level. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[8]  Kevin D Dorfman,et al.  Physical descriptions of the bacterial nucleoid at large scales, and their biological implications , 2012, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[9]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  Dynamic single cell culture array. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[10]  D. Weitz,et al.  Tracking lineages of single cells in lines using a microfluidic device , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Microfabrication meets microbiology , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[12]  R. Zare,et al.  Microfluidic platforms for single-cell analysis. , 2010, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[13]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes , 2006, Genome Biology.

[14]  Jeff Hasty,et al.  Streaming instability in growing cell populations. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[15]  Cees Dekker,et al.  Bacterial growth and motility in sub-micron constrictions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  R. Ismagilov,et al.  Microfluidic confinement of single cells of bacteria in small volumes initiates high-density behavior of quorum sensing and growth and reveals its variability. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[17]  R K Jain,et al.  Diffusion of macromolecules in agarose gels: comparison of linear and globular configurations. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Alex Groisman,et al.  A microfluidic chemostat for experiments with bacterial and yeast cells , 2005, Nature Methods.

[19]  N. Grover,et al.  On microbial states of growth † , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[20]  Edo Kussell,et al.  OPTIMAL LINEAGE PRINCIPLE FOR AGE‐STRUCTURED POPULATIONS , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  P. Cluzel,et al.  The single-cell chemostat: an agarose-based, microfluidic device for high-throughput, single-cell studies of bacteria and bacterial communities. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[22]  F. Blattner,et al.  Global Transcriptional Programs Reveal a Carbon Source Foraging Strategy by Escherichia coli*♦ , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  P. Lundberg,et al.  Diffusion of solutes in agarose and alginate gels: 1H and 23Na PFGSE and 23Na TQF NMR studies , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Andrew Wright,et al.  Robust Growth of Escherichia coli , 2010, Current Biology.

[25]  T. Laurell,et al.  Review of cell and particle trapping in microfluidic systems. , 2009, Analytica chimica acta.

[26]  B. Sclavi,et al.  Temperature-dependence of the DnaA-DNA interaction and its effect on the autoregulation of dnaA expression. , 2013, The Biochemical journal.

[27]  Andreas Manz,et al.  Latest developments in microfluidic cell biology and analysis systems. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  M. Bennett,et al.  Microfluidic devices for measuring gene network dynamics in single cells , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.