Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance

This research investigates the roles of supply chain information technologies (SCIT) and supply chain organisational initiatives (SCOI) in engendering agility and business performance in manufacturing firms. We examine two competing models, both of which incorporate agility as a mediator between the use of SCIT or SCOI and firm performance; the models differ in how the impacts of SCIT and SCOI are manifest. In one model, SCIT and SCOI are hypothesised to have separate effects on agility, which then impacts firm performance; in the second model, complementarities, or the interaction of SCIT and SCOI, impacts agility directly. Structural equation modelling results show that agility is full mediator, related to firm performance in both models. Further, the model with complementary interactions fits better. These results have implications for how manufacturing firms can position their investments in SCIT and SCOI to enhance agility and overall performance.

[1]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  N. Carr.  IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[3]  Eric Overby,et al.  Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[5]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies , 2001 .

[6]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1994 .

[8]  Shu Lin,et al.  Plant Information Systems, Manufacturing Capabilities, and Plant Performance , 2006, MIS Q..

[9]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[10]  Larry J. LeBlanc,et al.  EDI performance in the automotive supply chain , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[11]  Suzanne K. Bishop.  Cross-Functional Project Teams in Functionally Aligned Organizations , 1999 .

[12]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[13]  Roger Calantone,et al.  A Structural Analysis of the Effectiveness of Buying Firms' Strategies to Improve Supplier Performance , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[14]  Nagesh N. Murthy,et al.  Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility , 2008 .

[15]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Supplier evaluations: communication strategies to improve supplier performance , 2004 .

[16]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  Information Technology Impact on Process Output and Quality , 1997 .

[17]  G. Hancock,et al.  Performance of Bootstrapping Approaches to Model Test Statistics and Parameter Standard Error Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling , 2001 .

[18]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design , 2005 .

[19]  Blake Ives,et al.  Review: IT-Dependent Strategic Initiatives and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2005, MIS Q..

[20]  Walter J. Ferrier,et al.  The Role of Competitive Action in Market Share Erosion and Industry Dethronement: A Study of Industry Leaders and Challengers , 1999 .

[21]  K. Hitomi,et al.  GT cell formation for minimizing the intercell parts flow , 1992 .

[22]  D. Denison,et al.  From Chimneys to Cross-Functional Teams: Developing and Validating a Diagnostic Model , 1996 .

[23]  R. Pollak,et al.  The likelihood dominance criterion: A new approach to model selection , 1991 .

[24]  Gary D. Scudder,et al.  The use of electronic data interchange for supply chain coordination in the food industry , 2002 .

[25]  E. McDonough.  Investigation of Factors Contributing to the Success of Cross-Functional Teams , 2000 .

[26]  Bruce A. Pasternack,et al.  The CENTERLESS CORPORATION: A NEW MODEL FOR TRANSFORMING YOUR ORGANIZATION FOR GROWTH AND PROSPERITY , 1998 .

[27]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[28]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on the Organization of Economic Activity: The "Move to the Middle" Hypothesis , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Vasa syndrome: insights from a 17th-century new-product disaster , 2001, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[30]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Contribution of Strategic Sourcing to Manufacturing Flexibilities and Performance , 1999 .

[31]  R. Handfield,et al.  Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: The buying company perspective , 1998 .

[32]  L. Z. Stec,et al.  Supply chain agility: the influence of industry culture on asset capabilities within capital intensive industries , 2005 .

[33]  P. Bentler,et al.  Bootstrapping Techniques in Analysis of Mean and Covariance Structures , 1996 .

[34]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[35]  Rosemary R. Fullerton,et al.  The production performance benefits from JIT implementation , 2001 .

[36]  R. Solow.  We’d better watch out , 1987 .

[37]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  An Information Company in Mexico: Extending the Resource-Based View of the Firm to a Developing Country Context , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  e-Commerce Metrics for Net-Enhanced Organizations: Assessing the Value of e-Commerce to Firm Performance in the Manufacturing Sector , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  Hale Kaynak.  Implementing JIT Purchasing: Does the Level of Technical Complexity in the Production Process Make a Difference? * , 2005 .

[40]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Information technology, transaction costs and the decision to 'make or buy' , 1992 .

[41]  Jan H. M. Stroeken.  Information technology, innovation and supply chain structure , 2001, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[42]  A. Gogh.  The impact of information technology. , 1997, Caring : National Association for Home Care magazine.

[43]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Impact of Electronic Data Interchange Technology on JIT Shipments , 1994 .

[44]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[45]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  Effect of just-in-time purchasing relationships on organizational design, purchasing department configuration, and firm performance , 1997 .

[46]  Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan,et al.  Development and validation of a measurement instrument for studying supply chain management practices , 2005 .

[47]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  Building Collaborative New Product Processes: Why Instituting Teams Is Not Enough , 2003 .

[48]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[49]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[50]  Nagesh N. Murthy,et al.  The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing , 2006 .

[51]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[52]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Generating Premium Returns on Your it Investments , 2006 .

[53]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Avoid the Pitfalls in Supplier Development , 2000 .

[54]  Daniel Roos,et al.  The machine that changed the world : the story of lean production , 1991 .

[55]  IvesBlake,et al.  Review: it-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage , 2005 .

[56]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[57]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Becoming lean : inside stories of U.S. manufacturers , 1997 .

[58]  Arun Rai,et al.  Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities , 2006 .

[59]  Donald Gerwin,et al.  An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[60]  K. Goffin,et al.  An exploratory study of ‘close’ supplier–manufacturer relationships , 2006 .

[61]  Y Kano,et al.  Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[62]  R. Veliyath.  Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1996 .

[63]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Agile supply chain capabilities: Determinants of competitive objectives , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[64]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[65]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[66]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[67]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[68]  Gautam Ray,et al.  Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A Resource-Based Analysis , 2005, MIS Q..

[69]  I. Lewis,et al.  LOGISTICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: A COORDINATION PERSPECTIVE. , 1997 .

[70]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[71]  D. Wilemon,et al.  A Survey of Major Approaches for Accelerating New Product Development , 1992 .

[72]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[73]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Strategic and Operational Benefits of Electronic Integration in B2B Procurement Processes , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[74]  Bryan Hattingh,et al.  The competitive advantage , 2007 .

[75]  P. Weill,et al.  Building IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility , 2002 .

[76]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[77]  Ram Narasimhan,et al.  Manufacturing agility and supply chain management practices , 1999 .

[78]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Decision support for managing organizational design dynamics , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[79]  Harry Boer,et al.  Best manufacturing practices : what do the best-performing companies do? , 2005 .

[80]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[81]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[82]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Performance Effects of Information Technology Synergies in Multibusiness Firms , 2006, MIS Q..

[83]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[84]  Richard Makadok,et al.  Doing the right thing and knowing the right thing to do: why the whole is greater than the sum of the parts , 2003 .

[85]  N. Sanders,et al.  IT APPLICATIONS IN SUPPLY CHAIN ORGANIZATIONS: A LINK BETWEEN COMPETITIVE PRIORITIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL BENEFITS , 2002 .