Researching Situated Learning

Situated learning theory has emerged as a radical alternative to conventional cognitivist theories of knowledge and learning, emphasizing the relational and structural aspects of learning as well as the dynamics of identity construction. However, although many researchers have embraced the theoretical strengths of this perspective, methodological and operational issues remain undeveloped in the literature. This article seeks to address these deficiencies by developing a conceptual framework informed by situated learning theory and by investigating the methodological implications. The framework is applied in the context of an empirical study of how management consultants learn the practices and identities appropriate to client—consultant projects. By presenting two vignettes and interpreting them using the conceptual framework, we show how learning is regulated by the consulting firm as well as individuals themselves, and that, paradoxically, `failure to learn' may be an outcome of consultants' efforts to construct a coherent sense of self.

[1]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual , 2002 .

[2]  S. Clegg,et al.  Noise, Parasites and Translation , 2004 .

[3]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Emotional Labor in Service Roles: The Influence of Identity , 1993 .

[4]  H. Ibarra.  Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation , 1999 .

[5]  Andrew Sturdy,et al.  Management as a (Self) Confidence Trick: Management Ideas, Education and Identity Work , 2006 .

[6]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[7]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[8]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[9]  Robin Fincham,et al.  The Consultant–Client Relationship: Critical Perspectives on the Management of Organizational Change , 1999 .

[10]  A. Giddens.  Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , 1992, The New Social Theory Reader.

[11]  John S. Lochrie.  Perry revisited—A fresh look at Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years , 1989 .

[12]  ANIT M. THOMAS,et al.  Factors Influencing Analgesic Use for Skatepark-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries , 2003, The California journal of emergency medicine.

[13]  Matthias Kipping,et al.  Introduction: the dissemination of management knowledge , 2004 .

[14]  Carmelo Mazza,et al.  Consulting as a Liminal Space , 2003 .

[15]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[16]  Alistair Mutch,et al.  Communities of Practice and Habitus: A Critique , 2003 .

[17]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[18]  R. Whittington.  PUTTING GIDDENS INTO ACTION: SOCIAL SYSTEMS AND MANAGERIAL AGENCY , 1992 .

[19]  S. Clegg,et al.  Parasites and Translation : Theory and Practice in Management Consulting , 2004 .

[20]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Inter-Firm Collaboration, Learning and Networks , 2004 .

[22]  L. Lindkvist.  Knowledge Communities and Knowledge Collectivities: A Typology of Knowledge Work in Groups , 2005 .

[23]  Jennifer Robertson,et al.  Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace , 1990 .

[24]  Tony Huzzard,et al.  Communities of domination? Reconceptualising organisational learning and power , 2004 .

[25]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[26]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[27]  J. Orr,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .