Digital Representation and the Text Model

ID oes the digital representation of the text demand the definition of a model? In and of itself, every representation and, consequently, every form of text representation entails the implicit or explicit assumption of a model, at least if we accept the postulate that the “map is not the territory.” 1 So, the conventional image of a text, handwritten or typed, is itself a text model. The same thing can be said, then, of its digital representation or, to be more precise, of every form of its digital representation, regardless of its specific kind. The problem of the model presents itself, therefore, as a problem of adequacy with respect to the conventional model and representation. With respect to the conventional representation, an adequate digital representation should in no way impoverish the informative content of the text. If the digital text representation is not original, that is, if we consider a reproduction as opposed to a text produced directly in digital form, the first fundamental criterion for adequacy is constituted by the exhaustivity of the representation. In order to obtain the exhaustivity of the representation, markup is usually resorted to. In fact, textual information in machine-readable form is represented primarily by way of the binary coding of the characters: in this way, the “text” is conceived, from a computational point of view, as a type of data and the treatment of the text, that is, the “storage and processing of textual material,” comes to consist in the treatment of “information coded as characters or sequences of characters.” 2 It is evident, however, that the computational notion of the text as a type of data does not coincide with the notion of the text as a product of literary activity. The pure and simple character sequence is not adequate enough to represent all of the information contained in the “literary material as originally written by an author” (TP 1). Hence the need to furnish additional information by way of embedding markers defined by a given markup language.

[1]  Jerome J. McGann The Rationale of Hypertext , 2001 .

[2]  C. M. Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  GODDAG: A Data Structure for Overlapping Hierarchies , 2000, DDEP/PODDP.

[3]  G. Bateson,et al.  STEPS TO AN ECOLOGY OF MIND COLLECTED ESSAYS IN ANTHROPOLOGY, PSYCHIATRY, EVOLUTION, AND EPISTEMOLOGY , 2006 .

[4]  F. William Lawvere,et al.  Conceptual Mathematics: A First Introduction to Categories , 1997 .

[5]  Theodor Holm Nelson,et al.  Embedded Markup Considered Harmful , 1997, World Wide Web J..

[6]  J. Coulter The Literary Microcosm: Theories of Interpretation of the Later Neoplatonists , 1997 .

[7]  David G. Durand,et al.  What is text, really? , 1990, ASTR.

[8]  Kathryn Sutherland,et al.  Electronic text : investigations in method and theory , 1997 .

[9]  Dan Connolly,et al.  XML : principles, tools, and techniques , 1997 .

[10]  Malte Rehbein,et al.  TEXTUAL FLUIDITY AND DIGITAL EDITIONS , 1996 .

[11]  Derick Wood,et al.  From data representation to data model: Meta-semantic issues in the evolution of SGML , 1996, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[12]  Jean Véronis,et al.  Text Encoding Initiative: Background and Contexts , 1995 .

[13]  Dino Buzzetti,et al.  Image Processing and the Study of Manuscript Textual Traditions , 1995 .

[14]  C. M. Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  Guidelines for electronic text encoding and interchange , 1994 .

[15]  David G. Durand,et al.  Refining our Notion of What Text Really Is: The Problem of Overlapping Hierarchies , 1993 .

[16]  P. Lévy,et al.  Les technologies de l'intelligence : l'avenir de la pensée à l'ère informatique , 1993 .

[17]  Joan M. Smith,et al.  SGML and related standards: document description and processing languages , 1992 .

[18]  David T. Barnard,et al.  The Progress of SGML (Standard Generalized Markup Language): Extracts from a Comprehensive Bibliography , 1991 .

[19]  J. Whittaker,et al.  Prolégomènes À la Philosophie de Platon , 1990 .

[20]  Vincent Quint,et al.  Structured documents , 1989 .

[21]  David T. Barnard,et al.  SGML-based markup for literary texts: Two problems and some solutions , 1988, Comput. Humanit..

[22]  Cesare Segre,et al.  Introduction to the analysis of the literary text , 1988 .

[23]  Steven J. DeRose,et al.  Markup systems and the future of scholarly text processing , 1987, CACM.

[24]  M. Costantini Le texte et ses représentations , 1987 .

[25]  A. Colin Day,et al.  Text processing , 1984 .

[26]  Andrew M. Lister,et al.  Computer science : a modern introduction , 1982 .

[27]  Gianni Zucchino e Bianca Ghiron,et al.  Princípi di informatica , 1973 .

[28]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Image processing , 1971 .

[29]  I. Herstein,et al.  Topics in algebra , 1964 .

[30]  Westerink,et al.  Anonymous prolegomena to Platonic philosophy , 1962 .

[31]  Arne Naess,et al.  Interpretation and preciseness : a contribution to the theory of communication , 1953 .

[32]  P. Garvin,et al.  Prolegomena to a Theory of Language , 1953 .

[33]  W. Dilthey,et al.  Briefwechsel zwischen Wilhelm Dilthey und dem Grafen Paul Yorck von Wartenburg, 1877-1897 , 1923 .