Virtual Organization of Hospital Medical Imaging: A User Satisfaction Survey

A virtual medical imaging department is an innovative and demanding organizational model, to the extent that the underlying goal is to achieve a continuous and advanced organizational integration of human and physical resources, clinical data, and clienteles. To better understand the kind of benefits offered, we conducted a survey of three groups of users—radiologists, radiological technologists, and medical specialists—working in a five-site virtual organization. We received 127 valid questionnaires, for an overall response rate of 66%. The assessments vary according to the use made of the system. The scores for system quality and the quality of the data produced were markedly higher for intra-hospital use (respectively 7.9 and 8.7 out of 10) than for inter-hospital use (5.4 and 7.0). Despite the negative assessments they made of inter-hospital use, users maintained a positive attitude toward some type of virtual organization of medical imaging. Indeed, the score for Overall satisfaction with the system was very high, 8.9 out of 10. Moreover, the scores for Intended future use of the system were very high for both intra-hospital use (8.9) and inter-hospital use (8.7). We also found significant differences in perceptions among user groups.

[1]  E Nishihara,et al.  Preliminary time-flow study: comparison of interpretation times between PACS workstations and films. , 1995, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[2]  Arra Suresh Reddy,et al.  Budget Variance Analysis of a Departmentwide Implementation of a PACS at a Major Academic Medical Center , 2006, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[3]  Bruce I. Reiner,et al.  Changes in Technologist Productivity with Implementation of an Enterprisewide PACS , 2002, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[4]  Ping Yu,et al.  Work practice changes caused by the introduction of a picture archiving and communication system , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[5]  M. Buxton,et al.  The benefits of hospital-wide picture archiving and communication systems: a survey of clinical users of radiology services. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[7]  Rogier van de Wetering,et al.  A Balanced Evaluation Perspective: Picture Archiving and Communication System Impacts on Hospital Workflow , 2006, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  Ming-Chin Yang,et al.  Financial Assessment of a Picture Archiving and Communication System Implemented all at Once , 2006, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  J. Watkins,et al.  A hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system (PACS): the views of users and providers of the radiology service at Hammersmith Hospital. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[10]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  S Charvet-Protat,et al.  [Economic and organizational evaluation of an imaging network (PACS)]. , 1998, Journal de radiologie.

[12]  Eliot L Siegel,et al.  Accuracy of interpretation of CT scans: comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  I. Aas Organizational cooperation in teleradiology. , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  Andrea Botti,et al.  A Filmless Radiology Department in a Full Digital Regional Hospital: Quantitative Evaluation of the Increased Quality and Efficiency , 2007, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[15]  Guy Paré,et al.  Impact of PACS on Dictation Turnaround Time and Productivity , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[16]  Arie Hasman,et al.  Review Paper: Determinants of Success of Inpatient Clinical Information Systems: A Literature Review , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  Mythreyi Bhargavan,et al.  Radiologists' reading times using PACS and using films: one practice's experience. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[18]  Bernard Crowe,et al.  Implementation of a radiology information system/picture archiving and communication system and an image transfer system at a large public teaching hospital — assessment of success of adoption by clinicians , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[19]  Eliot L Siegel,et al.  Technologists' productivity when using PACS: comparison of film-based versus filmless radiography. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Bruce I. Reiner,et al.  SCAR Radiologic Technologist Survey: Analysis of the Impact of Digital Technologies on Productivity , 2002, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[21]  J R Pilling,et al.  Picture archiving and communication systems: the users' view. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  Peter Tually,et al.  User acceptance of the Web-based distribution of radiology services in regional and remote centres of Western Australia , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[23]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Bruce I. Reiner,et al.  Evolution of the Digital Revolution: A Radiologist Perspective , 2003, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[25]  G. Paré,et al.  Toward a multidimensional assessment of picture archiving and communication system success , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[26]  Guy Paré,et al.  Linking IT implementation and acceptance via the construct of psychological ownership of information technology , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[27]  Roberto Murri,et al.  Analysis of the X-ray Work Flow in Two Diagnostic Imaging Departments With and Without a RIS/PACS System , 2006, Journal of Digital Imaging.