Friendship Satisfaction and Gender: An Examination of Sex Differences in Contributors to Friendship Satisfaction

The purpose of this research was to examine sex differences in characteristics associated with the core provisions of friendship, namely, intimacy, mutual assistance and companionship. Although sex differences in the magnitude of these provisions were expected, it was hypothesized that the characteristics would function in a similar manner to promote friendship satisfaction. An additional goal was to provide an empirical evaluation of the relative contribution of the three types of provisions to friendship satisfaction. In Study 1, trust in male and female friends (intimacy), orientation to assistance (communal and exchange) and companionship attributes of friends were examined as elements of the individual's cognitive conceptions of friendships. The females (n = 94) reported greater trust in males, a more communal orientation to assistance and greater friendship satisfaction. Regression analyses revealed that for both males (n = 80) and females, trust in male friends contributed to friendship satisfaction while an exchange orientation detracted from it. In Study 2, Seventy-eight males and sixty females indicated the levels of self-disclosure, reciprocal exchange of assistance, enjoyment and negativity in their established friendships. Sex differences were evident in the magnitude of self-disclosure and friendship satisfaction reported by males and females. For both males and females, self-disclosure and friendship enjoyment were the significant predictors of friendship satisfaction. Overall, this research demonstrates that the characteristics associated with intimacy, namely self-disclosure and trust, and the affective tone associated with companionship are the most important contributors to friendship satisfaction for both males and females.

[1]  Jude Cassidy,et al.  Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. , 1985 .

[2]  Joseph P. Stokes,et al.  The relation of social network and individual difference variables to loneliness. , 1985 .

[3]  R. L. Archer,et al.  Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. , 1983 .

[4]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[5]  Manuel Barrera,et al.  Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students , 1981 .

[6]  B. I. Murstein,et al.  The Revised Exchange-Orientation Scale , 1987 .

[7]  Jorge L. Mendoza,et al.  A Step-Down Hierarchical Multiple Regression Analysis for Examining Hypotheses About Test Bias in Prediction , 1986 .

[8]  B. Winstead,et al.  Sex Differences in Same-Sex Friendships , 1986 .

[9]  E. Waters,et al.  Growing points of attachment theory and research , 1985 .

[10]  H. S. Sullivan The interpersonal theory of psychiatry , 1953 .

[11]  C. Johnson-George,et al.  Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. , 1982 .

[12]  Stephanie A. Tesch,et al.  Review of Friendship Development Across the Life Span. , 1983 .

[13]  Benjamin H. Gottlieb,et al.  Social Support and the Study of Personal Relationships , 1985 .

[14]  L. A. Peplau,et al.  Sex differences in same-sex friendship , 1982 .

[15]  P. Wright,et al.  Interpreting Research on Gender Differences in Friendship: A Case for Moderation and a Plea for Caution , 1988 .

[16]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Loneliness, social interaction, and sex roles. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[18]  R. Hays,et al.  A longitudinal study of friendship development. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Suzanna M. Rose,et al.  How Friendships End: Patterns among Young Adults , 1984 .

[20]  I. Levin,et al.  Gender differences in predicting loneliness from social network characteristics. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Joseph P. Stokes,et al.  Predicting satisfaction with social support from social network structure , 1983 .

[22]  R. Hays,et al.  The Day-to-Day Functioning of Close versus Casual Friendships , 1989 .

[23]  K. Rook,et al.  The negative side of social interaction: impact on psychological well-being. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Lynne R. Davidson,et al.  Friendship: Communication and interactional patterns in same-sex dyads , 1982 .

[25]  M. Greenberg,et al.  The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence , 1987, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[26]  J. Berg,et al.  Development of friendship between roommates. , 1984 .

[27]  P. Wright,et al.  Men's friendships, women's friendships and the alleged inferiority of the latter , 1982 .

[28]  J. Traupmann,et al.  Equity: Theory and Research , 1978 .

[29]  R. Larson,et al.  Daily well-being of older adults with friends and family. , 1986, Psychology and aging.

[30]  D. Buhrmester,et al.  The Changing Functions of Friends in Childhood: A Neo-Sullivanian Perspective , 1986 .